Does Gender Matter in the Production of Judges? Evidence From the Brazilian Judiciary

REFERENCES

• Ashenfelter, O., Eisenberg, T., & Schwab, S. (1995). Politics and the judiciary: The influence of judicial background on case outcomes. Journal of Legal Studies, 24(2), 257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backes-Gellner, U., Schneider, M., & Veen, S. (2011). Effect of workforce age on quantitative and qualitative organizational performance: Conceptual framework and case study evidence. Organization Studies, 32(8), 1103–1121. doi:10.1177/0170840611416746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio, M. C. (2017). About the relation between transgender people and the organizations: New subjects for studies on organizational diversity. REGE - Revista de Gestão, 24(4), 360–370. doi:10.1016/j.rege.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldez, L., Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2006). Does the U.S. Constitution need an ERA? The Journal of Legal Studies, 35(1), 243–283. doi:10.1086/498836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessière, C., & Mille, M. (2014). Judge is often a woman. Professional perceptions and practices of male and female family court judges in France. Sociologie du Travail, 56, e43–68. doi:10.1016/j.soctra.2014.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, M., & Smyth, R. (2001). Ageing and productivity among judges: Some empirical evidence from the High Court of Australia. Australian Economic Papers, 40(2), 199–212. doi:10.1111/1467-8454.00122
   Google Scholar
• Bogoch, B., & Don-Yechiya, R. (1999). Gender in justice: Bias against women in Israeli courts. Jerusalem, Israel: Jerusalem Institute for Israel Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bonelli, M. D G. (2015). Brazilian judges’ in-between professionalism, gender and difference. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 22(2), 134–150. doi:10.1080/09695958.2015.1029488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, C., Epstein, L., & Martin, A. (2010). Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 389–411. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, C. (2006). The effect of judge sex on case disposition method in federal district courts. Paper presented at the 2006 annual Conference for Empirical Legal Studies, Austin TX.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., & Cummings, C. (2003). Diversity and judicial decision making: Evidence from affirmative action cases in the federal courts of appeals, 1971–1999. Paper presented at the Crafting and Operating Institutions conference, Yale University.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, A. (2011). Indicadores básicos e desempenho da justiça estadual de primeiro grau no Brasil. Brasília: IPEA.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Gulati, M., Holman, M., & Posner, E. (2011). Judging woman. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(3), 504–532. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01218.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. M., Manning, L. K., & Carp, R. (2010). Gender, critical mass, and judicial decision making. Law & Policy, 32(2), 24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2010.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, T., & Moyer, L. (2007). Evaluating race and gender on the federal appellate bench. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago IL.
   Google Scholar
• Conselho Nacional de Justiça - CNJ. (2010). Resolução n.106: Dispõe sobre os critérios objetivos para aferição do merecimento para promoção de magistrados e acesso aos tribunais de segundo grau grau [Resolution n.106: Provides the criteria for merit appraisal for judges’ promotion and access to appeal courts]. Brasília: CNJ.
   Google Scholar
• Conselho Nacional de Justiça - CNJ. (2015). Trabalhar na magistratura, construção da subjetividade, saúde e desenvolvimento profissional. Série Justiça e Pesquisa [Working in the Judiciary, Construction of Subjectivity, Health and Professional Development. Series Justice and Research]. Brasília: CNJ.
   Google Scholar
• Conselho Nacional de Justiça – CNJ. (2016). Justiça em Números (dados de 2015). Indicadores do Poder Judiciário: panorama do Judiciário Brasileiro. Brasília: CNJ.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, N. (1999). The Effects of Judges’ Sex and Race on Judicial Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals 1981–1996 (Ph.D. Thesis). University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S., Haire, H., and., & Songer, D. (1993). Voting behavior and gender on the U.S. courts of appeals. Judicature, 77, 129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, L., Knight, J., & Martin, A. (2003). The norm of prior judicial experience and its consequences for career diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court. California Law Review, 91(4), 903–966. doi:10.2307/3481406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenan, D. (2008). Women judges: Gendering judging, justifying diversity. Journal of Law and Society, 35(4), 490–519. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00448.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, M. (1995). How do judges decide divorce cases? An empirical analysis of discretionary decision making. North Carolina Law Review, 74, 401–552.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, A., & Guimaraes, T. (2013). Desempenho no Judiciário: Conceituação, estado da arte e agenda de pesquisa. Revista de Administração Pública, 47(2), 379–401. doi:10.1590/S0034-76122013000200005
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, A., Guimaraes, T., & Akutsu, L. (2017). Court caseload management: The Role of judges and administrative assistants. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 21(5), 648–665. doi:10.1590/1982-7849rac2017160179
   Google Scholar
• Gomes, A., Guimaraes, T., & Souza, E. C. (2016). Judicial work and judges’ motivation: The perceptions of Brazilian State Judges. Law & Policy, 38(2), 162–176. doi:10.1111/lapo.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, A. F. (2005). O outro no trabalho: Mulher e gestão. Revista de Gestão USP, São Paulo, 12(3), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gryski, G., Main, E., & Dixon, W. (1986). Models of state high court decision making in sex discrimination cases. The Journal of Politics, 48(1), 143–155. doi:10.2307/2130930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judicial Appointment Commission. (2009). Barriers to application research report. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, F., Alarie, S., & Adjei, J. (2016). Undermining gender equality: Female attrition from private law practice. Law & Society Review, 50(3), 766–800. doi:10.1111/lasr.12214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K., & Greening, M. (2007). Gender justice or just gender? The role of gender in sexual assault decisions at the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Social Science Quarterly, 88(5), 1049–1071. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00491.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, C., Perry, E., & Pepper, M. (2003). Here comes the judge: The influence of judge personal characteristics on federal sexual harassment court decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 27(1), 69–86. doi:10.1023/A:1021678912133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louro, A., Santos, W., & Filho, H. (2017). Productivity antecedents of Brazilian Courts of Justice: Evidence from Justiça em Números. BAR - Brazilian Administration Review, 14(4), 1–18. doi:10.1590/1807-7692bar2017170032
   Google Scholar
• Mack, K., & Anleu, R. (2012). Entering the Australian judiciary: Gender and court hierarchy. Law & Policy, 34(3), 12–26. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2012.00365.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, K. L. (2004). ¿Como Decide? Decision-Making by Latino Judges in the Federal Courts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago IL. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p83393_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E., & Pyle, B. (2000). Gender, race and partisanship on the Michigan Supreme Court. Albany Law Review, 63, 1205–1236.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, E., & Pyle, B. (2005). State High Courts and divorce: The impact of judicial gender. University of Toledo Law Review, 36, 923–947.
   Google Scholar
• Massie, T., Johnson, S., & Green, S. (2002). The impact of gender and race in the decisions of judges on the United States courts of appeals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago IL.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, M. (2005). Court decision making in police brutality cases, 1990–2000. American Politics Research, 33(1), 56–80. doi:10.1177/1532673X04264986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogueira, J., Oliveira, K., Vasconcelos, A., & Oliveira, L. (2012). Estudo exploratório da eficiência dos Tribunais de Justiça estaduais brasileiros usando a análise envoltória de dados (DEA). Revista de Administração Pública, 46(5), 1317–1340. doi:10.1590/S0034-76122012000500007
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, É. C., Lucas, A. C., & Casado, T. (2017). Work-family conflict antecedents: Differences between men’s and women’s perceptions in the best companies for you to work. REGE–Revista de Gestão, 24(4), 293–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, M. A., & Nuno, G. (2011). Choosing judges in Brazil: Reassessing legal transplants from the United States. American Journal of Comparative Law, 59(2), 529–561. doi:10.5131/AJCL.2010.0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostberg, C., & Wetstein, M. (2007). Attitudinal decision making in the supreme court of Canada. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peresie, J. (2005). Female judges matter: Gender and collegial decision making in the federal appellate courts. Yale Law Journal, 114, 1759–1790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanzenbach, M., & Tiller, E. (2006). Strategic judging under the U.S. sentencing guidelines. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 23, 24–56. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewm002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2005). Judicial career incentives and court performance: An empirical study of the German Labor Courts of Appeal. European Journal of Law and Economics, 20(2), 127–144. doi:10.1007/s10657-005-1733-2
   Google Scholar
• Segal, J., Spaeth, H., & Benesh, S. (2005). The Supreme Court in the American legal system. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, S. M. C., & Lucas, A. (2018). The issue of gender and race in career progress and labor market. Revista de Gestão, 25(1), 2–8. doi:10.1108/REGE-11-2017-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira, N. S. (2006). A diversidade de gênero e as diferenças e semelhanças na hierarquia de valores do trabalho de homens e mulheres no chão de fábrica. Revista de Gestão USP, São Paulo, 13, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sisk, G., Heise, M., and., & Morris, A. (1998). Charting the inflences on the judicial mind: An empirical study of judicial reasoning. NYU Law Review, 73, 1377–1500.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R., & Bhattacharya, M. (2003). How fast do old judges slow down? A life cycle study of aging and productivity in the Federal Court of Australia. International Review of Law and Economics, 23(2), 141–164. doi:10.1016/S0144-8188(03)00029-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C. (1991). Decision making in sexual assault cases. Women & Criminal Justice, 2(1), 83–105. doi:10.1300/J012v02n01_06
   Google Scholar
• Taha, A. (2004). Publish or Paris? Evidence of how judges allocate their time. American Law and Economics Association, 6(1), 1–135. doi:10.1093/aler/ahg009
   Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum, J. (2006). Age and tenure of the justices and productivity of the U.S. Supreme Court: Are term limits necessary? Florida State University Law Review, 34, 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, L., & Azevedo, P. (2012). Além dos “achismos” e das evidências anedóticas: Medindo a eficiência dos tribunais brasileiros. Economia Aplicada, 16(4), 643–663. doi:10.1590/S1413-80502012000400005
   Google Scholar