Classroom Response Systems and Student Performance Improvement: Local Versus International Students

References

• Aggarwal, Raj, and John W. Goodell, (2015), “Encouraging short-term study abroad by understanding its value to IB Education”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 26 (1), 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaum, Gerald, (2011), “Being an educator in a foreign environment: One road to becoming internationalized”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 22 (3), 217–228.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, Ian, William Gerace, William Leonard, and Robert Dufresne, (2006). “Designing effective questions for classroom response system teaching”, American Journal of Physics 74 (1), 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bista, Krishna, (2015), “Asian international students’ college experience: Relationship between quality of personal contact and gains in learning”, Journal of International & Global Studies 6 (2), 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, JT, and David J. Nicol, (2003), “Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings”, Association for Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J) 11 (3), 43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bramorski, Tom, (2002), “The use of cases in teaching business courses in Central and Eastern Europe and the United States”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 13 (3–4), 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bruff, Derek, (2009), “Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments”, (Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, CA).
   Google Scholar
• Burnstein, Ray, and Leon Lederman, (2001), “Using wireless keypads in lecture classes”, The Physics Teacher 39, 8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, Jane, (2007), “Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips”, CBE-Life Sciences Education 6 (1), 9–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan, Kevin, Ian Brown, Bun Chung, Indie Chor, Lu Hui-Jing, and Green Wai-To Luk, (2013), “Using students response system via mobile devices in large introductory psychology classes”, retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/88431499/using-students-response-system-via-mobile-devices-large-introductory-psychology-classes
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Li-Rong Lilly, (1987), “Assessing Asian Language Performance: Guidelines for Evaluating Limited English Proficient Students”, (Aspen; Rockville, MD).
   Google Scholar
• Crossgrove, Kirsten, and Kristen Curran, (2008), “Using clickers in non-majors and majors-level biology courses: Student opinion, learning and long-term retention of course material”, CBE-Life Sciences Education 7, 146–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, Catherine, and Eric Mazur, (2001), “Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results”, American Journal of Physics 69 (9), 970–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cue, Nelson, (1998, December), “A universal tool for classrooms?”, paper presented at the First Quality in Teaching and Learning Conference, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
   Google Scholar
• DeLoach, Stephen B., Mark R. Kurt, and Neal H. Olitsky, (2015), “Does content matter? Analyzing the change in global awareness between business- and nonbusiness-focused short-term study abroad courses”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 26 (1), 4–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, Stephen W., and Margaret I. Brown, (2004), “Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, Stephen W., Julie Cargill, and Quintin Cutts, (2002), “Electronically enhanced classroom interaction”, Australian Journal of Educational Technology 18, 13–23.
   Google Scholar
• Dufresne Robert, William Gerace, William Leonard, Jose Mestre, and Laura Wenk, (1996), Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning”, Journal of Computing in Higher Education 7, 3–47.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Caroline, (2003), “Using a personal response system in economics teaching”, International Review of Economics Education 1 (1), 80–86, retrieved from http://www.economics.ltsn.ac.uk/iree/i1/elliott.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fies, Carmen, (2005), “Classroom response systems: What do they add to an active learning environment?”, unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Fies, Carmen, and Jill Marshall, (2006), “Classroom response systems: A review of the literature”, Journal of Science Education and Technology 15, 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, John H., (1979), “Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry”, American Psychologist 34, 906–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Allison B., (2012), “Development of an online, postclass question method and its integration with teaching strategies”, Journal of Chemical Education 89, 456–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Scott, Eileen O’Connor, John W. Parks, Matthew Cunningham, David Hurley, David Haak,… Mary Pat Wenderoth, (2007), “Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology”, CBE-Life Sciences Education 6, 132–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghatala, Elizabeth S., (1981), “The effect of internal generation of information on memory performance”, American Journal of Psychology 94, 443–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Jae Hoon, and Adam Finkelstein, (2013), “Understanding the effects of professors’ pedagogical development with clicker assessment and feedback technologies and the impact on students’ engagement and learning in higher education”, Computers & Education 65, 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshman, Elliot, and Robert A. Bjork, (1988), “The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 14, 484–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Angel, (2008), “Vibrant student voices: Exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses”, Learning, Media and Technology 33, 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, Geert, (1986), “Cultural differences in teaching and learning”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10, 301–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judson, Eugene, and Daiyo Sawada, (2002), “Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls”, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21, 167–181.
   Google Scholar
• Kaleta, Robert, and Tanya Joosten, (2007), “Student response systems: A University of Wisconsin system study of clickers”, retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erb0710.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Karaman, Selcuk, (2011), “Effects of audience response systems on student achievement and long-term rentention”, Social Behavior and Personality 39, 1431–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, Michael E., (2010), “The use of ‘clickers’ in the classroom: Teaching innovation or merely an amusing novelty?”, Computers in Human Behavior 26, 556–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz, Michael E., and Angela Stawiski, (2014), “Effectiveness of clickers: Effect of feedback and the timing of questions on learning”, Computers in Human Behavior 31, 280–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Jiaying, (2011), “English learning styles of students from East Asian countries: A focus on reading strategies”, International Education Studies 4 (2), 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Xiaojing, Shijuan Liu, Seunghee Lee, and Richard J. Magjuka, (2010), “Culture difference in online learning: International student perceptions”, Education Technology and Society 13 (3), 177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masikunas, George, Andreas Panayiotidis, and Linda Burke, (2007), “The use of electronic voting systems in lectures within business and marketing: A case study of their impact on student learning”, ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology 15 (1), 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Richard E., Andrew Stull, Krista DeLeeuw, Kevin Almeroth, Bruce Bimber, Dorothy Chun,… Hangjin Zhang, (2009), “Clickers in college classrooms: Fostering learning with questioning methods in large lecture classes”, Contemporary Educational Psychology 34 (1), 51–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazur, Eric, (1997), “Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual”, (Prentice Hall; Upper Saddle River, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, Simon K., Praveen Parboteeah, and Yushan Zhao, (2004), “On-line course design and delivery: Cross-national considerations”, Strategic Change 13 (4), 183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Morling, Beth, Meghan McAuliffe, Lawrence Cohen, and Thomas M. DiLorenzo, (2008), “Efficacy of personal response systems (“clickers”) in large, introductory psychology classes”, Teaching of Psychology 35, 45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, Michael, and Billy O’Steen, (2007), “Clicking on or off? Lecturers’ rationale for using student response systems”, paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Poirier, Christopher R., and Robert S. Feldman, (2007), “Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes”, Teaching of Psychology 34, 194–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribbens, Eric, (2007), “Why I like clicker personal response systems”, Journal of College Science Teaching 37 (2), 60–62.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Ronald, and Ulla Bunz, (2006), “Evaluating a wireless course feedback system: The role of demographics, expertise, fluency, competency, and usage”, Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education 6 (3), Article 80.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Dennis M., and Michael J. Collura, (2009), “Evaluating the effectiveness of a personal response system in the classroom”, Teaching of Psychology 36, 273–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shon, Herb, and Laurie Smith, (2011), “A review of Poll Everywhere audience response system”, Journal of Technology in Human Services 29, 236–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2011.616475
   Google Scholar
• Taconnat, Laurence, Charlotte Foger, Mathilde Sacher, and Michael Isingrini, (2008), “Generation and associative encoding in young and old adults: The effect of the strength of association between cues and targets on a cued recall task”, Experimental Psychology 55, 23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrion, Jennifer Lennox, (2012), “Student peer-mentors as a navigational resource in higher education”, in Fletcher, Sarah, and Mullen, Carol, (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, (pp. 383–395; SAGE; Thousand Oaks, CA).
   Google Scholar
• Tregonning, Alexandra M., Dorota A. Doherty, Janet Hornbuckle, and Jan E. Dickinson, (2012), “The audience response system and knowledge gain: A prospective study”, Medical Teacher 34 (4), 269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Auken, Stuart, Ludmilla G. Wells, and Daniel Borgia, (2009), “A comparison of Western business instruction in China with U.S. instructors: A case study of perceived program emphases and satisfaction level”, Journal of Teaching in International Business 20 (3), 208–229.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Minjuan, (2007), “Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds”, British Journal of Educational Technology 38 (2), 294–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit, Ernst, (2003), “Who wants to be… The use of a personal response system in statistics teaching”, MSOR Connections 3, 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Monstrose M., (1978), “Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart”, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 11 (2), 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar