42
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Integrating Explicit Political Costs into a World Trade Organization Negotiation Simulation

, Ph.DORCID Icon & , Ph.DORCID Icon

References

  • Akcetin, E., and N. C. Akcetin. 2012. “Learning International Trade by Game in Maritime Business Schools.” Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences 62:514–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.084.
  • Baldwin, R. 2016. “The World Trade Organization and the Future of Multilateralism.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 30 (1): 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.1.95.
  • Boyer, M. A., P. Trumbore, and D. O. Fricke. 2006. “Teaching Theories of International Political Economy from the Pit: A Simple In-Class Simulation.” International Studies Perspectives 7 (1): 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-3577.2006.00231.x.
  • Bratt, D., G. Anderson, C. Kukucha, and D. Sabiston. 2022. “Teaching Trade During COVID: Conducting a WTO Simulation Through Remote Delivery.” International Studies Perspectives 24 (3): 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekac011.
  • Caporaso, James. 2022. “Commerce, Jobs and Politics: The Impact of USA-China Trade on USA Domestic Politics.” International Trade, Politics and Development 6 (1): 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITPD-10-2021-0013.
  • Cezar, Rodrigo Fagundes. 2020. “Food Certification, Domestic Politics and International Trade: The US Compliance Response in Three WTO Disputes.” Environmental Politics 29 (2): 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1565462.
  • Chaisse, J., and D. Chakraborty. 2021. “The Future of International Trade Governance in a Protectionist World: Theorizing WTO Negotiating Perspectives.” Washington International Law Journal 31 (1): 1–57.
  • Chen, X., and J. Yur-Austin. 2013. “Exploring International Investment Through a Classroom Portfolio Simulation Project.” Journal of Teaching in International Business 24 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2013.810054.
  • Cook, N. P. S., and A. Pantuosco. 2022. “International Trade with Heterogeneous Firms: An Interactive Classroom Simulation.” The Journal of Economic Education 53 (1): 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2021.2004275.
  • Farashahi, M., and M. Tajeddin. 2018. “Effectiveness of Teaching Methods in Business Education: A Comparison Study on the Learning Outcomes of Lectures, Case Studies and Simulations.” The International Journal of Management Education 16 (1): 131–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2018.01.003.
  • Gao, H. 2022. “China’s Changing Perspective on the WTO: From Aspiration, Assimilation to Alienation.” World Trade Review; World Trade Review 21 (3): 342–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000088.
  • Garnjost, P., and L. Lawter. 2019. “Undergraduates’ Satisfaction and Perceptions of Learning Outcomes Across Teacher- and Learner-Focused Pedagogies.” The International Journal of Management Education 17 (2): 267–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.03.004.
  • Gunter, Lewell F., and Glenn C.W. Ames 1997. “The U.S. Mexican Winter Market Trade Dispute.” https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16682/.
  • Haupert, M. J. 1996. “An experiment in comparative advantage.” The Journal of Economic Education 27 (1): 37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1996.10844892.
  • Ho, Kevin K. 2003. “Trading Rights and Wrongs: The 2002 Bush Steel Tariffs.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 21 (3): 825.
  • Hoekman, B., and P. C. Mavroidis. 2021. “WTO Reform: Back to the Past to Build for the Future.” Global Policy 12 (S3): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12924.
  • Hoekman, B., and R. Wolfe. 2021. “Reforming the World Trade Organization: Practitioner Perspectives from China, the EU, and the US.” China & World Economy 29 (4): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12378.
  • Ismail, F. 2009. “An Assessment of the WTO Doha Round July–December 2008 Collapse.” World Trade Review 8 (4): 579–605. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745609990073.
  • Johnson, P. 2010. “Targeting Teaching: An International Economics Classroom Experiment.” Southern Economic Journal 77 (2): 501–13. https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.77.2.501.
  • Jones, Kent. 2023. “Populism, Globalization, and the Prospects for Restoring the WTO.” Politics & Governance 11 (1): 181–92. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.6086.
  • Kerevel, Y. P., P. Hultquist, and M. E. Edwards. 2017. “Multilevel Bargaining and the Negotiation of a Regional Trade Agreement: A Classroom Simulation.” PS, Political Science & Politics; APSC 50 (2): 576–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651600322X.
  • Kim, Wongi, and Yeo Joon Yoon. 2021. “Trump Tariffs and Firm Relief: Winners and Losers from the Steel Tariff Exclusion Request.” Applied Economics Letters 28 (16): 1357–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1817301.
  • Koopman, Robert B., and Mary Lisa Madell. 2022. “A Fairer and More Resilient Multilateral Trading System Will Require a Reinvigorated WTO.” Global Policy 14 (suppl. S2): 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13167.
  • Mason, P. M. 2001. “Representative Templates and Methodology for Stodder’s Comparative Advantage Experiments.” Classroom Experonomics 10 (1): 9–12.
  • Mohsen, K., S. Abdollahi, and S. Omar. 2019. “Evaluating the Educational Value of Simulation Games: Learners’ Perspective.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 56 (4): 517–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2018.1515646.
  • Nayar, B., and S. Koul. 2020. “Blended Learning in Higher Education: A Transition to Experiential Classrooms.” International Journal of Educational Management 34 (9): 1357–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2019-0295.
  • Peritz, Lauren. 2020. “When are International Institutions Effective? The Impact of Domestic Veto Players on Compliance with WTO Rulings.” International Studies Quarterly 64 (1): 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqz094.
  • Prado, A. M., R. Arce, L. E. Lopez, J. García, and A. A. Pearson. 2020. “Simulations versus Case Studies: Effectively Teaching the Premises of Sustainable Development in the Classroom.” Journal of Business Ethics 161 (2): 303–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04217-5.
  • Pritchard, B. 2009. “The Long Hangover from the Second Food Regime: A World-Historical Interpretation of the Collapse of the WTO Doha Round.” Agriculture and Human Values 26 (4): 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9216-7.
  • Reuters Staff. 2018. “Trump Tweets: “Trade Wars are Good, and Easy to win”.” https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-trump/trump-tweets-trade-wars-are-good-and-easy-to-win-idUSKCN1GE1E9.
  • Rickard, S. J. 2022. “Economic Geography, Politics, and the World Trade Regime.” World Trade Review; World Trade Review 21 (3): 367–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745622000040.
  • Rosendorff, B. Peter, and Alastair Smith. 2018. “Domestic Political Determinants of the Onset of WTO Disputes.” The Review of International Organizations 13 (2): 243–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-017-9296-x.
  • Sierra, J. 2020. “The Potential of Simulations for Developing Multiple Learning Outcomes: The Student Perspective.” The International Journal of Management Education 18 (1): 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100361.
  • Steagall, J. W., T. E. Jares, and A. Gallo. 2012. “Teaching Real-World Political Economy: Simulating a WTO Negotiation.” Journal of Teaching in International Business 23 (1): 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2012.687999.
  • Stodder, J. 1994. “A simple experiment of comparative advantage.” Classroom Experonomics 3 (1): 8–10.
  • Winchester, N. 2006. “A Classroom Tariff-Setting Game.” The Journal of Economic Education 37 (4): 431–41. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.4.431-441.
  • World Trade Organization 2023a. https://rtais.wto.org/UI/PublicAllRTAList.aspxWorld.
  • World Trade Organization 2023b. “DDG Paugam: Trade is Becoming More Political, More Sustainable, More Traceable.” October 3. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news23_e/ddgjp_03oct23_e.htm.
  • World Trade Organization 2023c. “International Trade Statistics.” https://stats.wto.org/.
  • Yin, H. 2020. “Effectiveness of a Negotiation Simulation Game in IB Learning.” Journal of Teaching in International Business 31 (1): 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2020.1729291.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.