Solving Multiresponse Optimization Problems Using Quality Function–Based Robust Design

REFERENCES

• Akao , Y. ( 1972 ). New product development and quality assurance–quality development system . Standardization and Quality Control , 25 ( 4 ): 7 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Ansari , A. , Modarress , B. (1994). Quality function deployment: The role of suppliers. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management , 30(4):28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cauchick-Miguel , P. A. ( 2005 ). Evidence of QFD best practices for product development: A multiple case study . The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management , 22 ( 1 ): 72 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Chan , L.-K. , Wu , M.-L. ( 2002a ). Quality function deployment: A comprehensive review of its concepts and methods . Quality Engineering , 15 ( 1 ): 23 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Chan , L.-K. , Wu , M.-L. ( 2002b ). Quality function deployment: A literature review . European Journal of Operational Research , 143 ( 3 ): 463 – 497 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho , B. R. ( 1994 ). Optimization Issues in Quality Engineering . Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation , University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , L. ( 1995 ). Quality Function Deployment: How to Make QFD Work for You . Reading , MA : Addison-Wesley .
   Google Scholar
• Devadasan , S. R. , Kathiravan , N. , Thirunavukkarasu , V. ( 2006 ). Theory and practice of total quality function deployment: A perspective from a traditional pump-manufacturing environment . The TQM Magazine , 18 ( 2 ): 143 .
   Google Scholar
• Franceschini , F. , Rossetto , S. ( 1997 ). Design for quality: Selecting a product's technical features . Quality Engineering , 9 ( 4 ): 681 – 688 .
   Google Scholar
• Franceschini , F. , Zappulli , M. ( 1998 ). Product's technical quality profile design based on competition analysis and customer requirements: An application to a real case . International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management , 15 ( 4 ): 431 – 442 .
   Google Scholar
• Fung , R. Y. K. , Poppelwell , K. , Xie , J. ( 1998 ). An intelligent hybrid system for customer requirements analysis and product attribute targets determination . International Journal of Production Research , 36 ( 1 ): 13 – 34 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung , R. Y. K. , Tang , J. , Tu , Y. , Wang , D. ( 2002 ). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model . International Journal of Production Research , 40 ( 3 ): 585 – 599 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin , A. , Hauser , J. R. ( 1993 ). The voice of the customer . Marketing Science , 12 ( 1 ): 1 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser , J. R. , Clausing , D. ( 1988 ). The house of quality . Harvard Business Review , 66 ( 3 ): 63 – 73 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier , F. S. , Lieberman , G. J. ( 2001 ). Introduction to Operations Research . New York : McGraw-Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Karsak , E. E. ( 2004 ). Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment . International Journal of Production Research , 42 ( 18 ): 3957 – 3974 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak , E. E. , Sozer , S. , Alptekin , S. E. ( 2003 ). Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach . Computers & Industrial Engineering , 44 ( 1 ): 171 – 190 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim , K. J. ( 1997 ). Determining optimal design characteristic levels in quality function deployment . Quality Engineering , 10 ( 2 ): 295 – 307 .
   Google Scholar
• Kim , Y. J. , Cho , B. R. ( 2002 ). Development of priority-based robust design . Quality Engineering , 14 ( 3 ): 355 – 363 .
   Google Scholar
• Kovach , J. ( 2007 ). Designing efficient six sigma experiments for service process improvement projects . International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage , 3 ( 1 ): 72 – 90 .
   Google Scholar
• Kovach , J. , Fredendall , L. D. , Cho , B. R. ( 2007 ). The interconnectedness among auxiliary benefits and supporting practices within the quality function deployment process . International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage , 3 ( 2 ): 137 – 155 .
   Google Scholar
• Lin , D. K. J. , Tu , W. ( 1995 ). Dual response surface optimization . Journal of Quality Technology , 27 ( 1 ): 34 – 39 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locascio , A. , Thurston , D. L. ( 1998 ). Transforming the house of quality to a multiobjective optimization formulation . Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , 16 ( 2 ): 136 – 146 .
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz , H. , Kim , K. J. ( 1997 ). QFD optimizer: A novice friendly quality function deployment decision support system for optimizing product designs . Computers and Industrial Engineering , 32 ( 3 ): 641 – 655 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park , T. , Kim , K. J. ( 1998 ). Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality . Journal of Operations Management , 16 ( 5 ): 569 – 581 .
   Google Scholar
• Ross , P. J. ( 1988 ). The role of Taguchi methods and design of experiments in QFD . Quality Progress , 21 ( 6 ): 41 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi , G. ( 1986 ). Introduction to Quality Engineering: Designing Quality into Products and Processes . New York : Krauss International Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Taguchi , G. ( 1987 ). System of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods to Optimize Quality and Minimize Costs . Dearborn , MI : American Supplier Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Terninko , J. ( 1997 ). The QFD, TRIZ, and Taguchi connection: Customer-driven robust innovation . The Ninth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment , QFD Institute , June 1997, Nori, MI .
   Google Scholar
• Vining , G. C. , Myers , R. H. ( 1990 ). Combining taguchi and response surface philosophies—A dual response approach . Journal of Quality Technology , 22 ( 1 ): 38 – 45 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , H. , Xie , M. , Goh , T. N. ( 1998 ). A comparative study of the prioritization matrix method and the analytic hierarchy process technique in quality function deployment . Total Quality Management , 9 ( 6 ): 421 – 430 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , J. ( 1999 ). Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment . International Journal of Production Research , 37 ( 4 ): 899 – 916 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman , G. S. ( 1993 ). On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process . IIE Transactions , 25 ( 3 ): 59 – 65 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie , M. , Goh , T. N. , Tan , K. C. ( 2003 ). Advanced QFD Applications . Milwaukee , WI : ASQ Quality Press .
   Google Scholar
• Zultner , R. E. ( 2005 ). The essential role of QFD in design for Six Sigma: Modern QFD for modern TQM . The Seventeenth Symposium on Quality Function Deployment , Portland , OR , QFD Institute .
   Google Scholar