References
- Berni, R. (2010). Split-plot for robust design: Weighting and optimization in the multiple response case. In: Giovagnoli A., Atkinson A. C., Torsney B., May C. Eds. mODa9- Advances in Model-Oriented Design and Analysis, pp. 25–32, Series Contribution to Statistics. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
- Berni, R., Gonnelli, C. (2006). Planning and optimization of a numerical control machine in a multiple response case. Quality Reliability Engineering International. 22:517–526.
- Berni, R., Scarano, V. L., Bertocci, F., Catelani, M. (2013). Mixed response surface models and Bayesian analysis of variance components for electrically conductive adhesives. Applied Stochastic Models and Business in Industry. 29:387–398.
- Brosheer, B. C. (1948). How smooth is smooth? Part-I, specification and evaluation of machined finishes. American Machinist, 92:97–119.
- Cox, D. R., Reid, N. (2000). The Theory of the Design of Experiments. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall.
- Dehlendorff, C., Kulahci, M., Andersen, K. K. (2010). Analysis of computer experiments with multiple noise sources. Quality Reliability Engineering International, 26(2):137–146.
- Del Castillo, E. (2007). Process Optimization. New York, Springer-Verlag.
- Jain, V. K. (2002). Advanced Machining Processes. New Delhi: Allied Publishers Private Limited.
- Khuri, A. I. (1996). Response surface models with mixed effects. Journal of Quality Technology, 28:177–186.
- Khuri, A. I. (2006). Mixed response surface models with heterogeneous within-block error variances. Technometrics, 48:206–218.
- Khuri, A. I., Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010). Response surface methodology. WIREs Computational Statistics, 2:128–149.
- Lin, D. K. J., Tu, W. (1995). Dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 27:34–39.
- Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments. 5th ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
- Myers, R. H., Khuri, A. I., Vining, G. (1992). Response surface alternatives to the Taguchi robust parameter design approach. The American Statistician, 46:131–139.
- Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C., Vining, G. G., Borror, C. M., Kowalski, S. M. (2004). Response surface methodology: A retrospective and literature survey. Journal of Quality Technology, 36:53–77.
- Rajagopal, R., Del Castillo, E., Peterson, J. J. (2005). Model and distribution-robust process optimization with noise factorsJournal of Quality Technology, 37:210–222.
- Rhodes, J. (1991). Abrasive flow machining: A case study. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 28:107–116.
- Robinson, T. J., Brenneman, W. A., Myers, W. R. (2006). Process optimization via robust parameter design when categorical noise factors are present. Quality & Reliability Engineering International, 22:307–320.
- Robinson, T. J., Wulff, S. S., Montgomery, D. C., Khuri, A. I. (2006) Robust parameter design using generalized linear mixed models. Journal of Quality Technology, 38:65–75.
- Searle, S. R., Casella, G., McCulloch, C. E. (1992). Variance Components. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Tang, L. C., Xu, K. (2002). A unified approach for dual response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 34:437–447.
- Vining, G. G., Myers, R. H. (1990). Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach. Journal of Quality Technology, 22:38–45.
- Walia, R. S., Shan, H. S., Kumar, P. (2007). Dynamically active abrasive particles in the media used in centrifugal force assisted abrasive flow machining. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38:1157–1165.