A Graphical Method to Assist Quality Decisions throughout the Product Development Process

REFERENCES

• Augustine, M., Yadav, O. P., Jain, R., Rathore, A. P. S. (2010). Concept convergence process: A framework for improving product concepts. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59:367–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani, M., Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17):13051–13069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhamare, S. S., Yadav, O. P., Rathore, A. (2009). A hybrid quality loss function–based multi-objective design optimization approach. Quality Engineering, 21(3):277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausing, D. (1994). Total Quality Development. New York: ASME Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2000). Engineering Design Methods. Strategies for Product Design Methods. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ebadian, M., Rabbani, M., Jolai, F., Torabi, S. A., Moghaddam, R. A. (2008). A new decision-making structure for the order entry stage in make-to-order environments. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2):351–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, D., Herder, P., Wijnia, Y., Subrahmanian, E., Katsikopoulos, K., Clausing, D. (2009). The Pugh controlled convergence method: Model-based evaluation and implications for design theory. Research in Engineering Design, 20:41–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurumurthy, A., Kodali, R. (2012). An application of analytic hierarchy process for the selection of a methodology to improve the product development process. Journal of Modelling in Management, 7(1):97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Harr, S., Clausing, D. P., Eppinger, S. D. (1993). Integration of quality function deployment and the design structure matrix. Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Harte, J. M., Koele, P., Van Engelenburge, G. (1996). Estimation of attribute weights in a multiattribute choices situation. Acta Psychologica, 93(1):37–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. M., Sivaloganathan, S. (1999). Development of a methodology for concept selection in flexible design strategies. Journal of Engineering Design, 10(4):329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Mesa, B., Bylund, N. (2011). A study of the use of concept selection methods from inside a company. Research in Engineering Design, 22(1):7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharis, C., Turcksin, L., Lebeau, K. (2012). Multi actor multi criteria analysis (MAMCA) as a tool to support sustainable decisions: State of use. Decision Support Systems, 54(1):610–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, E. R., Slocum, A. H., Otto, K. N. (1993). Hierarchical decision making in machine design. Technical Report. Cambridge, MA: MIT Precision Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, T. E., Lin, Y., Tsui, K.-L., Chen, V. C. P., Allen, J. K. (2011). Identifying feasible design concepts for products with competing performance requirements by metamodeling of loss-scaled principal components. Quality Engineering, 23(2):167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevins, J. L., Whitney, D. E. (1989). Concurrent Design of Products and Processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Okudan, G. E., Tauhid, S. (2008). Concept selection methods—A literature review from 1980 to 2008. International Journal of Design Engineering, 1(3):243–277.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering Design. London: The Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S. (1981). Concept selection—A method that works. In: Hubka, V., Ed. Review of Design Methodology. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, 9–13 March 1981, Rome. Zürich: Heurista, 497–506.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, S. (1991). Total Design. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, R., Mistree, F. (1992). Modeling uncertainty in selection using exact interval arithmetic. In: Stauffer, L. A., Taylor, D. L. Eds. ASME DE: Vol. 42. Design Theory and Methodology 92. New York: ASME, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1):9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salonen, M., Perttula, M. (2005). Utilization of concept selection methods—A survey of Finnish industry. Paper read at ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, September 24–28, Long Beach, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sopadang, A., Cho, B. R., Leonard, M. (2002). Development of the hybrid weight assessment system for multiple quality attributes. Quality Engineering, 15(1):75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. (1990). The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, D. L. (1990). Subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes. Paper read at ASME DTM 90, Chicago, IL, September 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Thurston, D. L., Carnahan, J. V., Liu, T. (1991). Optimization of design utility. Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology, 31:173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Ullman, D. G. (1992). The Mechanical Design Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., Mulanjur, G., Thiagarajan, A. (2013). Sustainable concept selection using modified fuzzy TOPSIS: A case study. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 6(2): 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2002). Improved engineering design concept selection using fuzzy sets. International Journal of Computer Integrated manufa-cturing, 15(1):18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S. R., Buede, D. M. (1987). Decision Synthesis: The Principles and Practice of Decision Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M. C. (2010). Consensus and single leader decision-making in teams using structured design methods. Design Studies, 31(4):345–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. P., Hwang, C. L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar