Performing competitive analysis in QFD studies using state multipole moments and bootstrap sampling

References

• Allen, I. E., and C. A. Seaman. 2007. Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress 40 (7):64.
   Google Scholar
• Andronikidis, A., A. C. Georgiou, K. Gotzamani, and K. Kamvysi. 2009. The application of quality function deployment in service quality management. The TQM Journal 21 (4):319–333.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, H., and C. Kwong. 2003. Inexact genetic algorithm approach to target values setting of engineering requirements in QFD. International Journal of Production Research 41 (16):3861–3881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchereau, V., and H. Rowlands. 2000. Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment (QFD). Benchmarking: An International Journal 7 (1):8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Buttle, F. 1996. SERVQUAL: Review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing 30 (1):8--32.
   Google Scholar
• Camparo, J., and L. B. Camparo. 2013. The analysis of likert scales using state multipoles an application of quantum methods to behavioral sciences data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 38 (1):81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., and M. L. Wu. 2005. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega 33 (2):119–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., H. P. Kao, and M. L. Wu. 1999. Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research 37 (11):2499–2518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudha, A., R. Jain, A. Singh, and P. Mishra. 2011. Integration of Kano's Model into quality function deployment (QFD). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 53 (5–8):689–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.-H., and C.-N. Chen. 2014. Normalisation models for prioritising design requirements for quality function deployment processes. International Journal of Production Research 52 (2):299–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, K. S., K. F. Pun, W. Leung, and H. Lau. 2001. A quality function deployment approach for improving technical library and information services: a case study. Library Management 22 (4/5):195–204.
   Google Scholar
• Deros, B. M., N. Rahman, M. N. A. Rahman, A. R. Ismail, and A. H. Said. 2009. Application of quality function deployment to study critical service quality characteristics and performance measures. European Journal of Scientific Research, 33 (3), 398–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dikmen, I., M. T. Birgonul, and S. Kiziltas. 2005. Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry. Building and Environment 40 (2):245–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffuaa, S. O., U. M. Al-Turki, and F. M. Hawsawi. 2003. Quality function deployment for designing a basic statistics course. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 20 (6):740–750.
   Google Scholar
• Esteban-Ferrer, M. J., and J. Tricás. 2012. Applying QFD to strategic quality management in law firms. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 23 (11–12):1433–1451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., and D. Maisano. 2015. Prioritization of QFD customer requirements based on the law of comparative judgments. Quality Engineering 27 (4):437–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franceschini, F., M. Galetto, D. Maisano, and L. Mastrogiacomo. 2015. Prioritisation of engineering characteristics in QFD in the case of customer requirements orderings. International Journal of Production Research 53 (13):3975–3988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibay, C., H. Gutiérrez, and A. Figueroa. 2010. Evaluation of a digital library by means of quality function deployment (QFD) and the Kano model. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 36 (2):125–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göb, R., C. McCollin, and M. F. Ramalhoto. 2007. Ordinal methodology in the analysis of likert scales, quality & quantity 41 (5):601–626.
   Google Scholar
• González, M. E., G. Quesada, F. Picado, and C. A. Eckelman. 2004. Customer satisfaction using QFD: An e-banking case. Managing Service Quality 14 (4):317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, Z., N. P. Grigg, K. Govindaraju, and N. Campbell-Allen. 2014. Statistical comparison of final weight scores in quality function deployment (QFD) studies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 31 (2):184–204.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal, Z., N. P. Grigg, K. Govindaraju, and N. Campbell-Allen. 2016. A distance-based methodology for increased extraction of information from the roof matrices in QFD studies. International Journal of Production Research 54 (11):3277–3293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, M., and H. Oh. 1998. Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management 17 (4):375–390.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, P., J. Jin, T. Wang, and Y. Chen. (2014). Quantification and integration of Kano's model into QFD for optimising product design. International Journal of Production Research 52 (21):6335–6348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., J. Antony, and T. S. Dhakar. 2006. Integrating quality function deployment and benchmarking to achieve greater profitability. Benchmarking: An International Journal 13 (3):290–310.
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R., S. Roslow, and G. Murphy. 1934. A simple and reliable method of scoring the Thurstone attitude scales. The Journal of Social Psychology 5 (2):228–238.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-T. 2009. The extension of fuzzy QFD: From product planning to part deployment. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (8):11131–11144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahm, Y.-E., H. Ishikawa, and M. Inoue. 2013. New rating methods to prioritize customer requirements in QFD with incomplete customer preferences. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 65 (9–12):1587–1604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manly, B. F. 2007. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, W. E. 1949. Numerical calculus. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthen, B., and D. Kaplan, 1992. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 45 (1):19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, A., J. Harding, and K. Popplewell. 1999. Design for customer satisfaction: an information modelling approach. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 10 (4):199–209.
   Google Scholar
• Pakdil, F., F. B. Işın, and H. Genç. 2012. A quality function deployment application using qualitative and quantitative analysis in after sales services. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 23 (11–12):1397–1411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Y. Geum, and Y. Park. 2015. A dual quality function deployment approach for benchmarking service quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 26 (5–6):569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partovi, F. Y. 1999. A quality function deployment approach to strategic capital budgeting. The Engineering Economist 44 (3):239–260.
   Google Scholar
• Partovi, F. Y., and R. A. Corredoira. 2002. Quality function deployment for the good of soccer. European Journal of Operational Research 137 (3):642–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paryani, K., A. Masoudi, and E. Cudney. 2010. QFD application in the hospitality industry: A hotel case study. Quality Management Journal 17 (1):7–28
   Google Scholar
• Pramod, V., S. Devadasan, S. Muthu, V. Jagathyraj, and G. D. Moorthy. (2006). Integrating TPM and QFD for improving quality in maintenance engineering. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 12 (2):150–171.
   Google Scholar
• Pun, K., K. Chin, and H. Lau. 2000. A QFD/approach for service quality deployment: a case study. Managing Service Quality 10 (3):156–170.
   Google Scholar
• Ralston, A. 1965. A first course in numerical analysis. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Y. 2000. Improving the rationale capture capability of QFD. Engineering with Computers 16 (3–4):236–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sant'Anna, A. P. 2012. Probabilistic priority numbers for failure modes and effects analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 29 (3):349–362
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. S. 1946. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103 (2864):677–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, F. I., and S. S. Tax. 1996. Planning for service quality: an integrative approach. International Journal of Service Industry Management 7 (4):58–77.
   Google Scholar
• Talebi, D., H. Farsijani, F. Sedighi, and M. Shafiei Nikabadi. 2014. The role of quality benchmarking deployment to world-class manufacturing. Quality Engineering 26 (2):206–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanik, M. 2010. Improving “order handling” process by using QFD and FMEA methodologies: a case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 27 (4):404–423.
   Google Scholar
• Utne, I. B. 2009. Improving the environmental performance of the fishing fleet by use of Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Journal of Cleaner Production 17 (8):724–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viaene, J., and R. Januszewska. 1999. Quality function deployment in the chocolate industry. Food Quality and Preference 10 (4):377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, G. S. 1993. On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process. IIE Transactions 25 (3):59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund, P. S., and H. Wiklund. 1999. Student focused design and improvement of university courses. Managing Service Quality 9 (6):434–443.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. Y., and H. Y. Lin. 2012. A hybrid approach to develop an analytical model for enhancing the service quality of e-learning. Computers & Education 58 (4):1318–1338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar