498
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Advanced FMEA method based on interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and TOPSIS

, , , , &

References

  • Bian, T., H.-Y. Zheng, L.-K. Yin, and Y. Deng. 2018. Failure mode and effects analysis based on D numbers and TOPSIS. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 34 (4):501–15. doi: 10.1002/qre.2268.
  • Geum, Y., Y. Cho, and Y. Park. 2011. A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: Service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 54 (11–12):3126–42. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.042.
  • Guimaraes, A.-C.-F., and C.-M.-F. Lapa. 2007. Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems. Applied Soft Computing 7 (1):17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2005.06.002.
  • Hu, J., Y. Du, H. Mo, D. Wei, and Y. Deng. 2016. A Modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 444:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.028.
  • Ju, Y.-B., D.-W. Ju, A.-H. Wang, and M.-Y. Ju. 2017. GRP method for multiple attribute group decision making under trapezoidal interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 33 (6):3469–82. doi: 10.3233/JIFS-16608.
  • Kumar, K., and H. Garg. 2018. TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Computational and Applied Mathematics 37 (2):1319–29. doi: 10.1007/s40314-016-0402-0.
  • Kutlu, A. C., and M. Ekmekçioğlu. 2012. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (1):61–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.06.044.
  • Liu, H.-C., P. Li, J.-X. You, and Y.-Z. Chen. 2015. A novel approach for FMEA combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and gray relational analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (5):761–72. doi: 10.1002/qre.1633.
  • Liu, H.-C., L. Liu, and J. Wu. 2013. Material selection using an interval 2-tuple linguistic VIKOR method considering subjective and objective weights. Materials & Design (1980-2015) 52:158–67. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.054.
  • Liu, H.-C., M.-L. Ren, J. Wu, and Q.-L. Lin. 2014. An interval 2-tuple linguistic MCDM method for robot evaluation and selection. International Journal of Production Research 52 (10):2867–80. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2013.854939.
  • Liu, H.-C., X.-Y. You, F. Tsung, and P. Ji. 2018. An improved approach for failure mode and effect analysis involving large group of experts: An application to the healthcare field. Quality Engineering 30 (4):762–75. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2018.1448089.
  • Liu, H.-C., J.-X. You, X.-Y. You, and M.-M. Shan. 2015. A novel approach for failure mode and effects analysis using combination weighting and fuzzy VIKOR method. Applied Soft Computing 28:579–88. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.11.036.
  • Mo, H.-M., and Y. Deng. 2018. A new MADA methodology based on D numbers. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 20 (8):2458–69. doi: 10.1007/s40815-018-0514-3.
  • Peng, Z., J. Liu, F. Hao, and B. Zhou. 2019. FLM-TOPSIS: The fuzzy linguistic multiset TOPSIS method and its application in linguistic decision making. Information Fusion 45:266–81. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.01.013.
  • Rahimi, S.-A., A. Jamshidi, D. Ait-Kadi, and A. Ruiz. 2015. Using fuzzy cost-based FMEA, GRA and profitability theory for minimizing failures at a healthcare diagnosis service. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 31 (4):601–15. doi: 10.1002/qre.1619.
  • Schneider, H. 1996. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. Technometrics 38 (1):80. doi: 10.1080/00401706.1996.10484424.
  • Selim, H., M.-G. Yunusoglu, and S.-Y. Balaman. 2016. A dynamic maintenance planning framework based on fuzzy TOPSIS and FMEA: Application in an international food company. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (3):795–804. doi: 10.1002/qre.1791.
  • Wang, W.-Z., X.-W. Liu, Y. Qin, and Y. Fu. 2018. A risk evaluation and prioritization method for FMEA with prospect theory and Choquet integral. Safety Science 110:152–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.009.
  • Wang, Y.-M., K.-S. Chin, G.-K.-K. Poon, and J.-B. Yang. 2009. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2):1195–207. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028.
  • Wei, G.-W. 2015. Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems 17 (3):484–9. doi: 10.1007/s40815-015-0060-1.
  • Xiao, F.-Y. 2018. A novel multi-criteria decision making method for assessing health-care waste treatment technologies based on D numbers. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 71:216–25. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2018.03.002.
  • Xing, Y.-J., and C. Xing. 2016. Model for evaluating the virtual enterprise's risk with 2-tuple linguistic information. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 31 (1):193–200. doi: 10.3233/IFS-162132.
  • Yang, J., H.-Z. Huang, L.-P. He, S.-P. Zhu, and D.-W. Wen. 2011. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster-Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty. Engineering Failure Analysis 18 (8):2084–92. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2011.06.014.
  • Zhang, H.-M. 2012. The multiattribute group decision making method based on aggregation operators with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic information. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 56 (1–2):27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2012.01.001.
  • Zhou, Y.-Q., J.-W. Xia, Y.-T. Zhong, and J.-H. Pang. 2016. An improved FMEA method based on the linguistic weighted geometric operator and fuzzy priority. Quality Engineering 28 (4):491–89. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2015.1132320.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.