Accurate estimation of prediction models for operator-induced defects in assembly manufacturing processes

References

• Aft, L. S. 2000. Work measurement and methods improvement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Antani, K. R. 2014. A study of the effects of manufacturing complexity on product quality in mixed-model automotive assembly. PhD. diss., Mechanical Engineering Department, Clemson University. http://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1540.
   Google Scholar
• Báez, Y. A., M. A. Rodriguez, J. Limon, and D. A. Tlapa. 2014. Model of human reliability for manual workers in assembly lines. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 1448–1452, Bandar Sunway, Malaysia, December 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., and D. G. Watts. 1988. Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Caputo, A. C., P. M. Pelagagge, and P. Salini. 2017. Modelling human errors and quality issues in kitting processes for assembly lines feeding. Computers & Industrial Engineering 111:492–506. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, T.-L., and C.-T. Su. 2003. Optimization of TQFP molding process using neuro-fuzzy-GA approach. European Journal of Operational Research 147 (1):156–64. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00258-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devore, J. L. 2011. Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Draper, N. R., and H. Smith. 1998. Applied regression analysis. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. W., J. Y. Evans, and B. Kil Yu. 1997. Designing and building-in reliability in advanced microelectronic assemblies and structures. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology: Part A 20 (1):38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Falck, A.-C., R. Örtengren, M. Rosenqvist, and R. Söderberg. 2017. Proactive assessment of basic complexity in manual assembly: Development of a tool to predict and control operator-induced quality errors. International Journal of Production Research 55 (15):4248–60. doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1227103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, A. 2007. Multivariate statistical process control based on principal component analysis (MSPC-PCA): Some reflections and a case study in an autobody assembly process. Quality Engineering 19 (4):311–25. doi:10.1080/08982110701621304.
   Google Scholar
• Gearbox, R. M., G. J. Pawar, and S. J. Mukhopadhyay. 2015. Application of design failure modes and effect analysis (DFMEA) to vertical. International Journal of Engineering Research 4 (12):663–7.
   Google Scholar
• Genta, G., M. Galetto, and F. Franceschini. 2018. Product complexity and design of inspection strategies for assembly manufacturing processes. International Journal of Production Research 56 (11):4056–66. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1430907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, D. W., and A. Kusiak. 1997. Design of assembly systems for modular products. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 13 (5):646–55. doi:10.1109/70.631226.
   Google Scholar
• Hinckley, C. M. 1994. A global conformance quality model. A new strategic tool for minimizing defects caused by variation, error, and complexity. Livermore, CA: Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA).
   Google Scholar
• Hinckley, C. M., and P. Barkan. 1995. A conceptual design methodology for enhanced conformance quality. Livermore, CA: Sandia National Labs.
   Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, K. 1976. Guide to quality control: Industrial engineering and technology. Tokyo, Japan: Asian Productivity Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, C. W., M. B. Ramzan, B. Sarkar, and M. Imran. 2018. Effect of inspection performance in smart manufacturing system based on human quality control system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 94 (9-12):4351–64. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-1069-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolus, A., R. Wells, and P. Neumann. 2018. Production quality and human factors engineering: A systematic review and theoretical framework. Applied Ergonomics 73:55–89. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugh, M., K. Antani, L. Mears, and J. Schulte. 2016a. Statistical modeling of defect propensity in manual assembly as applied to automotive electrical connectors. Procedia CIRP 44:441–6. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.335.
   Google Scholar
• Krugh, M., K. Antani, L. Mears, and J. Schulte. 2016b. Prediction of defect propensity for the manual assembly of automotive electrical connectors. Procedia Manufacturing 5:144–57. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.014.
   Google Scholar
• Kvålseth, T. O. 1983. Note on the R2 measure of goodness of fit for nonlinear models. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21 (I):79–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kvålseth, T. O. 1985. Cautionary note about R 2. The American Statistician 39 (4):279–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land, C. E. 1974. Confidence interval estimation for means after data transformations to normality. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69 (347):795–802. doi:10.2307/2286020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, Y., S. Qiang, and S. Liangfa. 2012. A novel method of analyzing quality defects due to human errors in engine assembly line. Paper presented at the 2012 International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), Vol. 3, 154–157, Sanya, China, October 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Liengme, B. 2008. A guide to Microsoft Excel 2007 for scientists and engineers. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., and J. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. London, UK: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. M. 1984. Reducing transformation bias in curve fitting. The American Statistician 38 (2):124–6. doi:10.2307/2683247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W. 2010. Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 15 (12):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, M. B. 2018a. Approximate prediction intervals in the original units when fitting models using data transformations. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 34 (1):53–65. doi:10.1002/qre.2235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. B. 2018b. Prediction intervals for the original response when using Manly’s exponential transformations. Quality Engineering 30 (2):195–211. doi:10.1080/08982112.2017.1357827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M. B., and M. L. Walker. 2015. A prediction interval estimator for the original response when using Box–Cox transformations. Journal of Quality Technology 47 (3):278–97. doi:10.1080/00224065.2015.11918133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ping, Z., W. Hua, and C. Guanlong. 2008. Application of wavelet analysis to BIW assembly quality evaluation. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management 14 (1/2):189–200. doi:10.1504/IJMTM.2008.017494.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, R., E. A. Cudney, and Z. Hamzic. 2015. An Optimal plan of zero-defect single-sampling by attributes for incoming inspections in assembly lines. European Journal of Operational Research 246 (3):907–15. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakia, R. M. 1988. Application of the Box-Cox transformation technique to linear balanced mixed analysis of variance models mixed with a multi-error structure. PhD. diss., Universität Hohenheim, FRG.
   Google Scholar
• Sakia, R. M. 1990. Retransformation bias: A look at the Box-Cox transformation to linear balanced mixed ANOVA models. Metrika 37 (1):345–51. doi:10.1007/BF02613542.
   Google Scholar
• Saptari, A., J. X. Leau, and N. A. Mohamad. 2015. The effect of time pressure, working position, component bin position and gender on human error in manual assembly line. Paper presented at the 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), 1–6, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, March 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Seber, G. A. F., and C. J. Wild. 1989. Nonlinear regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata, H. 2002. Global assembly quality methodology: A new methodology for evaluating assembly complexities in globally distributed manufacturing. PhD. diss., Mechanical Engineering Department, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata, H., B. Cheldelin, and K. Ishii. 2003. Assembly quality methodology: A new method for evaluating assembly complexity in globally distributed manufacturing. Paper presented at the ASME 2003 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 335–344. PhD. diss., American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D., R. A. Wysk, and L. Rothrock. 2006. An investigation of a human material handler on part flow in automated manufacturing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 36 (1):123–35. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2005.859175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiess, A. N., and N. Neumeyer. 2010. An evaluation of R2 as an inadequate measure for nonlinear models in pharmacological and biochemical research: A Monte Carlo approach. BMC Pharmacology 10 (1):1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2210-10-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SPSS Inc. 2004. SPSS 13.0 Base user’s guide ®. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Su, Q., L. Liu, and D. E. Whitney. 2010. A systematic study of the prediction model for operator-induced assembly defects based on assembly complexity factors. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 40 (1):107–20. doi:10.1109/TSMCA.2009.2033030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. M. G. 1986. The retransformed mean after a fitted power transformation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (393):114–8. doi:10.2307/2287976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandebroek, M., L. Lan, and K. Knapen. 2016. An experimental diagnostic procedure to identify the source of defects in multi-stage and multi-component production processes. Journal of Quality Technology 48 (3):213–26. doi:10.1080/00224065.2016.11918162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevelde, B., A. Griffoni, F. Zanon, and G. Willems. 2018. Methodology for solder-joint lifetime prediction of LED-based PCB assemblies. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability 18 (3):377–82. doi:10.1109/TDMR.2018.2849083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoqing, T., W. Bo, and W. Shuchun. 2010. Quality assurance model in mechanical assembly. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 51 (9-12):1121–38. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2679-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagiwa, Y. 1988. An assembly ease evaluation method for product designers: DAC. Techno Japan 21 (12):26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., and T. Luk. 2007. A data mining algorithm for monitoring PCB assembly quality. IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing 30 (4):299–305. doi:10.5772/711.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, S. 2000. Dynamic quality control in assembly systems. Iie Transactions 32 (9):797–806. doi:10.1080/07408170008967439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, J., J. Liu, and J. Shi. 2010. Predictive control considering model uncertainty for variation reduction in multistage assembly processes. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering 7 (4):724–35. doi:10.1109/TASE.2009.2038714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar