Implementation of Quality 4.0, a systematic review of approaches, root causes, and challenges

References

• Ahsan, M., K. Ahmad, J. Ahamed, M. Omar, and K. A. B. Ahmad. 2023. PAPQ: Predictive analytics of product quality in industry 4.0. Sustainable Operations and Computers 4:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2023.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Al, E., and A. Abran. 2011. A maturity model of software product quality. Journal of Research and Practice in IT 43 (4):307–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldag, M., and B. Eker. 2018. What is Quality 4.0 in the Era of Industry 4.0? In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Quality of Life, 28–30. Kopaonik, Serbia: Center for Quality, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac.
   Google Scholar
• Antonino, P. O., R. Capilla, P. Pelliccione, F. Schnicke, D. Espen, T. Kuhn, and K. Schmid. 2022. A Quality 4.0 Model for architecting industry 4.0 systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics 54:101801. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2022.101801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony, J., M. Sony, O. McDermott, R. Jayaraman, and D. Flynn. 2021. An exploration of organizational readiness factors for Quality 4.0: An intercontinental study and future research directions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 40 (2):582–606. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-10-2021-0357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, M., and D. Iorga. 2023. Data analysis for Quality 4.0. FAIMA Business & Management Journal 11 (2):15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, M., E. Bottani, F. E. Ciarapica, F. Costantino, L. Di Donato, A. Ferraro, G. Mazzuto, A. Monteriù, G. Nardini, M. Ortenzi, et al. 2020. Digital twin reference model development to prevent operators’ risk in process plants. Sustainability 12 (3):1088. doi: 10.3390/su12031088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousdekis, A., K. Lepenioti, D. Apostolou, and G. Mentzas. 2023. Data analytics in quality 4.0: Literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 36 (5):678–701. doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2022.2128219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAi, L., and Y. Zhu. 2015. The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Science Journal 14 (0):2. doi: 10.5334/dsj-2015-002.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A. V., and T. M. Lima. 2022. Quality 4.0 and cognitive engineering applied to quality management systems: A framework. Applied System Innovation 5 (6):115. doi: 10.3390/asi5060115.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarini, A. 2020. Industry 4.0, quality management and TQM world. A systematic literature review and a proposed agenda for further research. The TQM Journal 32 (4):603–616. doi: 10.1108/TQM-04-2020-0082.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J., T. Edgar, J. Porter, J. Bernaden, and M. Sarli. 2012. Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance. Computers & Chemical Engineering 47:145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, A., A. M. Carvalho, and P. Sampaio. 2021. Quality 4.0: Literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 39 (6):1312–1335. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovleac, R. 2021. Knowledge management systems in Quality 4.0. In. MATEC Web of Conferences 342:09003. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/202134209003.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, S. 2022. QFD for selecting key success factors in the implementation of quality 4.0. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 38 (6):3216–3232. doi: 10.1002/qre.3138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. D., J. Faria, A. Azevedo, and A. L. Marques. 2016. Product Lifecycle Management Enabled by Industry 4.0 Technology. http://repositorio.inesctec.pt/handle/123456789/6854
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, L., A. Amaral, and J. Oliveira. 2021. Quality 4.0: The EFQM 2020 model and Industry 4.0 relationships and implications. Sustainability 13 (6):3107. doi: 10.3390/su13063107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glogovac, M., J. Ruso, and M. Maricic. 2022. ISO 9004 maturity model for quality in industry 4.0. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 33 (5-6):529–547. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2020.1865793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanafiah, M. H., M. Soomro, and N. Abdullah. 2020. Industry 4.0 readiness models: A systematic literature review of model dimensions. Information 11 (7):364. doi: 10.3390/info11070364.
   Google Scholar
• Hasić, F., B. Beirens, and E. Serral. 2022. Maturity model for IoT adoption in hospitals. Computing and Informatics 41 (1): 213–232. doi: 10.31577/cai_2022_1_213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.bcg.com/about/people/experts/daniel-kuepper, & https://www.bcg.com/about/people/experts/dave-ryeson. October 26. Quality 4.0 Takes More Than Technology. BCG Global. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/quality-4.0-takes-more-than-technology
   Google Scholar
• https://www.facebook.com/JuranInstitute. June 15. Quality 4.0: The Future of Quality? Juran. https://www.juran.com/blog/quality-4-0-the-future-of-quality/
   Google Scholar
• Illés, B., P. Tamás, P. Dobos, and R. Skapinyecz. 2017. New challenges for quality assurance of manufacturing processes in Industry 4.0. Solid State Phenomena 261:481–486. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.261.481.
   Google Scholar
• Ingaldi, M., and R. Ulewicz. 2019. How to make E-commerce more successful by use of Kano’s model to assess customer satisfaction in terms of sustainable development. Sustainability 11 (18):4830. doi: 10.3390/su11184830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javaid, M., A. Haleem, R. Pratap Singh, and R. Suman. 2021. Significance of Quality 4.0 towards comprehensive enhancement in manufacturing sector. Sensors International 2:100109. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100109.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., R. Jin, X. Deng, and R. S. Kenett. 2023. Challenges of modeling and analysis in cybermanufacturing: A review from a machine learning and computation perspective. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 34 (2):415–428. doi: 10.1007/s10845-021-01817-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, K., and N. Arunachalam. 2018. A digital twin for grinding wheel: An information sharing platform for sustainable grinding process. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 141 (2):021015. doi: 10.1115/1.4042076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenett, R. S., and G. Shmueli. 2016. Information Quality: The Potential of Data and Analytics to Generate Knowledge. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Küpper, D., C. Knizek D. Ryeson, and J. Noecker. 2019. Quality 4.0 Takes More Than Technology. https://www.bcg.com/publications/2019/quality-4.0-takes-more-than-technology (accessed July 30, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Laskurain-Iturbe, I., G. Arana-Landin, B. Landeta-Manzano, and R. Jimenez-Redal. 2023. Assessing the uptake of Industry 4.0 technologies: Barriers to their adoption and impact on quality management aspects. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 40 (10):2420–2442. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-10-2022-0292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. Y. H., P. Zheng, and C.-H. Chen. 2020. A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: Techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31 (6):1313–1337. doi: 10.1007/s10845-019-01512-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., F. Tao, M. Zhang, T. Wang, and Y. Zuo. 2019. Digital twin enhanced human-machine interaction in product lifecycle. Procedia CIRP 83:789–793. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.330.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, C., B. Dion, and M. Davoudabad. 2017. Creating a Digital Twin for a Pump. ANSYS Advantage (1):8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C. 2019. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nenadál, J. 2020. The New EFQM model: What is really new and could be considered as a suitable tool with respect to Quality 4.0 concept? Quality Innovation Prosperity 24 (1):17. doi: 10.12776/qip.v24i1.1415.
   Google Scholar
• Nenadál, J., D. Vykydal, P. Halfarová, and E. Tylečková. 2022. Quality 4.0 maturity assessment in light of the current situation in the Czech Republic. Sustainability 14 (12):7519. doi: 10.3390/su14127519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraschivescu, A. O. 2021. Quality 4.0. Economy Transdisciplinarity Cognition 24 (2):5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Quality 4.0 Impact and Strategy Handbook. n.d. [eBook]. Accessed July 28, 2023. https://members.lnsresearch.com/research-library/research-articles/-ebook-quality-4.0-impact-and-strategy-handbook
   Google Scholar
• Quality Resources | ASQ. n.d. Accessed July 28, 2023 https://asq.org/quality-resources
   Google Scholar
• Radziwill, N. M. 2018. Quality 4.0: Let’s get digital - The many ways the fourth industrial revolution is reshaping the way we think about quality. Quality Progress, ASQ 24–29. (arXiv:1810.07829). arXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.07829.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjith Kumar, R., L. S. Ganesh, and C. Rajendran. 2022. Quality 4.0 – A review of and framework for quality management in the digital era. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 39 (6):1385–1411. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-05-2021-0150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüßmann, M., M. Lorenz, P. Gerbert, M. Waldner, J. Justus, and M. Harnisch. 2015. Industry 4.0: The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. Boston consulting group 9 (1):54–89.
   Google Scholar
• Sader, S., I. Husti, and M. Daroczi. 2022. A review of quality 4.0: Definitions, features, technologies, applications, and challenges. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 33 (9–10):1164–1182. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2021.1944082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saihi, A., M. Awad, and M. Ben-Daya. 2021. Quality 4.0: Leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies to improve quality management practices – A systematic review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 40 (2):628–650. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2021-0305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAnchez-Marquez, R., J. M. Albarracín Guillem, E. Vicens-Salort, and J. Jabaloyes Vivas. 2020. Diagnosis of quality management systems using data analytics – A case study in the manufacturing sector. Computers in Industry 115:103183. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.103183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, G., J. C. Sá, M. J. Félix, L. Barreto, F. Carvalho, M. Doiro, K. Zgodavová, and M. Stefanović. 2021. New needed quality management skills for quality managers 4.0. Sustainability 13 (11):6149. doi: 10.3390/su13116149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivam, and M. Gupta. 2023. Quality process reengineering in industry 4.0: A BPR perspective. Quality Engineering 35 (1):110–129. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2022.2098044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderberg, R., K. Wärmefjord, J. S. Carlson, and L. Lindkvist. 2017. Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production. CIRP Annals 66 (1):137–140. doi: 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sony, M., J. Antony, J. A. Douglas, and O. McDermott. 2021. Motivations, barriers and readiness factors for Quality 4.0 implementation: An exploratory study. The TQM Journal 33 (6):1502–1515. doi: 10.1108/TQM-11-2020-0272.
   Google Scholar
• Stasiak-Betlejewska, R., L. Parv, and W. Gliń. 2018. The influence of Industry 4.0 on the enterprise competitiveness. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering 1 (1):641–648. doi: 10.2478/mape-2018-0081.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, T., and G. Seliger. 2016. Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40:536–541. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.129.
   Google Scholar
• Thekkoote, R. 2022. Enabler toward successful implementation of Quality 4.0 in digital transformation era: A comprehensive review and future research agenda. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 39 (6):1368–1384. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vial, G. 2019. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28 (2):118–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., G. Zhang, and Q. Yan. 2019. Digital twin-driven cyber-physical production system towards smart shop-floor. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 10 (11):4439–4453. doi: 10.1007/s12652-018-1125-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, P., T.-J. Lin, C.-H. Chen, and X. Xu. 2018. A systematic design approach for service innovation of smart product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 201:657–667. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonnenshain, A., and R. S. Kenett. 2020. Quality 4.0—The challenging future of quality engineering. Quality Engineering 32 (4):614–626. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2019.1706744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulfiqar, M., J. Antony, V. Swarnakar, M. Sony, R. Jayaraman, and O. McDermott. 2023. A readiness assessment of Quality 4.0 in packaging companies: An empirical investigation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 34 (11-12):1334–1352. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2023.2170223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar