How open innovation processes vary between urban and remote environments: slow innovators, market-sourced information and frequency of interaction

References

• Abramovsky, L., and H. Simpson. 2011. “Geographic Proximity and Firm-university Innovation Linkages: Evidence from Great Britain.” Journal of Economic Geography 11: 949–977.10.1093/jeg/lbq052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almirall, E., and R. Casadesus-Masanell. 2010. “Open Versus Closed Innovation: A Model of Discovery and Divergence.” Academy of Management Review 35 (1): 27–47.10.5465/AMR.2010.45577790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., and L. Coenen. 2006. “Contextualising Regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 163–173.10.1007/s10961-005-5028-0
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D., and M. Feldman. 1996. “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Association 86 (3): 630–640.
   Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., and P. Turi. 2011. “Local, Global and Virtual Buzz: The Importance of Face-to-face Contact in Economic Interaction and Possibilities to Go beyond.” Geoforum 42: 520–529.10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell. 2004. “Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 31–56.10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74.10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewin, D., D. Monchuk, and M. Partridge. 2009. “Examining the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in the Canadian Food Processing Industry.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (1): 75–97.10.1111/cjag.2009.57.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E., and A. Kleinecht. 1999. “Innovative Output, and a Firm’s Propensity to Patent.” An Exploration of CIS Micro Data, Research Policy 28: 615–624.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, S. 2012. Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can’t Stop Talking. New York: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Camagni, R. 2011. “Creativity, Culture and Urban Milieux.” In Sustainable City and Creativity, edited by L. Girard, T. Baycan, and P. Nijkamp, 183–198. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Capello, R. 2001. “Urban Innovation and Collective Learning: Theory and Evidence from Five Metropolitan Cities in Europe.” In Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems, edited by M. Fischer and J. Fröhlich, 181–208. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carrincazeaux, C. 2001. “Une évaluation du rôle de la proximité dans la coordination des activités de R&D des firmes [Evaluating the Role of Proximity for the Coordination of R&D Activity in Firms].” Revue d’Économie Régionale et Urbaine 1: 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., K. Frenken, and B. Los. 2014. “Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An Analysis of U.S. State-level Patenting.” Regional Studies 49 (5): 767–781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesborough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. 1985. “The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and Market Concepts in Technological Evolution.” Research Policy 14: 235–251.10.1016/0048-7333(85)90007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W., R. Nelson, and J. Walsh. 2000. Protecting Their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or Not). Working Paper 7552. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2011. “Food Geography and the Organic Empire: Modern Quests for Cultural-Creative Related Variety.” In Beyond Territory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation, Diffusion and Innovation, edited by H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, and D. Kogler, 149–167. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., M. Heidenreich, and H.-J. Braczyk, eds. 2004. Regional Systems of Innovation: The Role of Governance in a Globalized World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Currid, E. 2007. The Warhol Economy: How Fashion and Music Drive New York City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowska, J., I. Fiegenbaum, and A. Kutoven. 2013. “Mapping the Perception and Reality of Open Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management 17 (6): 1–25. doi:10.1142/S1363919613400161.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., and D. Gann. 2010. “How Open is Innovation?” Research Policy 39: 699–709.10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P., and P. Lloyd. 1990. Location in Space: Theoretical Perspectives in Economic Geography. London: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Duranton, G., and D. Puga. 2001. “Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation, and the Life-cycle of Products.” The American Economic Review 91 (5): 1454–1477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitjar, R., and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2011. “Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Southwest Norway.” European Planning Studies 19 (4): 555–574.10.1080/09654313.2011.548467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 1995. “Toward the Learning Region.” Futures 27 (5): 527–536.10.1016/0016-3287(95)00021-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M. 2003. “Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity.” Research Policy 32: 751–770.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00084-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, X. 2008. “Foreign Direct Investment.” Absorptive Capacity and Regional Innovation Capabilities: Evidence from China, Oxford Development Studies 36 (1): 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M. 2009. “Dynamics of Innovation Fields with Endogenous Heterogeneity of People.” In New Directions in Regional Economic Development, edited by C. Karlsson, A. Andersson, P. Cheshire and R. Stough, 59–78. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-01017-0
   Google Scholar
• Giuliani, E. 2007. “Towards an Understanding of Knowledge Spillovers in Industrial Clusters.” Applied Economics Letters 14: 87–90.10.1080/13504850500425907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. 2011. The Triumph of the City: How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier and Happier. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., and O. Ibert. 2014. “Distance as Asset?” Knowledge Collaboration in Hybrid Virtual Communities, Journal of Economic Geography 14: 97–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and M. Nilsson. 2015. “Innovation in Peripheral Regions: Do Collaborations Compensate for Lack of Local Knowledge Spillovers?” Annals of Regional Science. 54.:1 299–321. doi:10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., F. Tödtling, and C. Höglinger. 2015. “Variety in Knowledge Sourcing, Geography and Innovation: Evidence from the ICT Sector in Austria.” Papers in Regional Science 94 (1): 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, F. 2012. “Do Clusters Really Matter for Innovation Practices in Information Technology? Questioning the Significance of Technological Knowledge Spillovers” Journal of Economic Geography 12 (1): 107–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizingh, E. 2011. “Open Innovation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.” Technovation 31: 2–9.10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., and P. McCann. 2006. “The Structure and Evolution of Industrial Clusters: Transactions, Technology and Knowledge Spillovers.” Research Policy 35: 1018–1036.10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, J. A. Isaksen, and O. Spilling. 2011. “The Challenges of Constructing Regional Advantages in Peripheral Areas: The Case of Marine Biotechnology in Tromso, Norway.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 23 (3–4): 235–257.10.1080/08985620903233945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., T. Reichstein, and A. Salter. 2011. “Exploring the Effect of Geographical Proximity and University Quality on University-industry Collaboration in the United Kingdom.” Regional Studies 45 (4): 507–523.10.1080/00343400903401618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., and A. Rodriguez-Pose. 2013. “Original Innovation, Learnt Innovation and Cities: Evidence From UK SMEs.” Urban Studies 50 (9): 1742–1759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, B. 2014. Me, Myself and Us. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B.-Å. 1985. Product Innovation and User–Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, A. 1997. “The Role of Producer Service Outsourcing in the Innovation Performance of New York State Manufacturing Firms.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87 (1): 52–71.10.1111/0004-5608.00041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPherson, A. 2008. “Producer Service Linkages and Industrial Innovation: Results of a Twelve-year Tracking Study of New York State Manufacturers.” Growth and Change 39 (1): 1–23.10.1111/grow.2008.39.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillat, D., M. Quévit, and L. Senn, eds. 1993. Réseaux d’innovation et milieux innovateurs: un pari pour le dévloppement régional [Innovation networks and innovative Milieux: A wager for regional development]. Neuchâtel: Groupe de Recherche Européen sur les Milieux Innovateurs (GREMI).
   Google Scholar
• Malecki, E., and R. Poehling. 1999. “Extroverts and Introverts: Small Manufacturers and Their Information Sources.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 11: 247–268.10.1080/089856299283191
   Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. 2002. “Sectoral Systems of Innovation and Production.” Research Policy 31: 247–264.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F., and L. Orsenigo. 2010. “User–Producer Relations, Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structures under Alternative Contractual Regimes.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 21: 26–40.10.1016/j.strueco.2009.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., and J. Moodysson. 2011. “Comparing Knowledge Bases: On the Geography and Organization of Knowledge Sourcing in the Regional Innovation System of Scania, Sweden.” European Urban and Regional Studies 20 (2): 170–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, P. 2007. “Sketching out a Model of Innovation, Face-to-face Interaction and Economic Geography.” Spatial Economic Analysis 2: 117–134.10.1080/17421770701346622
   Google Scholar
• Moriset, B., and E. Malecki. 2009. “Organization Versus Space: The Paradoxical Geographies of the Digital Economy.” Geography Compass 3 (1): 256–274.10.1111/geco.2009.3.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., and R. Rabellotti. 2009. “Knowledge and Information Networks in an Italian Wine Cluster.” European Planning Studies 17 (7): 983–1006.10.1080/09654310902949265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mors, M. 2010. “Innovation in a Global Consulting Firm: When the Problem is Too Much Diversity.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (8): 841–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and F. Sekia. 2003. “Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey.” Regional Studies 37: 289–302.10.1080/0034340032000065442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula, R. 2002. “Innovation Systems and ‘Inertia’ in R&D Location: Norwegian Firms and the Role of Systemic Lock-in.” Research Policy 31: 795–816.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00148-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2000. Learning and Innovation in Organizations and Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D., and D. Smallbone. 2000. “The Innovativeness and Growth of Rural SMEs during the 1990s.” Regional Studies 34 (2): 145–157.10.1080/00343400050006069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2005. Oslo Manual: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Onsager, K., A. Isaksen, M. Fraas, and T. Johnstad. 2007. “Technology Cities in Norway: Innovating in Glocal Networks.” European Planning Studies 15 (4): 549–566.10.1080/09654310601134896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oort, F., and J. Lambooy. 2014. “Cities, Knowledge, and Innovation.” In Handbook of Regional Science, edited by M. Fischer and P. Nijkamp, 475–488. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. 1984. “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory.” Research Policy 13: 343–373.10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrov, A. 2011. “Beyond Spillovers: Interrogating Innovation and Creativity in the Peripheries.” In Beyond Territory, edited by H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, and D. Kogler, 168–190. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pina, K., and B. Tether. 2016. “Towards Understanding Variety in Knowledge Intensive Business Services by Distinguishing Their Knowledge Bases.” Research Policy 45: 401–413.10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. 2003. “The Economic Performance of Regions.” Regional Studies 37: 549–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallet, A. 2002. “L’école de proximités: propos d’étape [The proximity school: Where it is at] .” Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement 33: 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2011. “Innovation.” Regions and Proximity: From Neo-regionalism to Spatial Analysis, Regional Studies 45 (9): 1225–1244.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2012. “Are Cities the Font of Innovation? A Critical Review of the Literature on Cities and Innovation” Cities 29 (2): S2–S18.
   Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2015. “Far from the Madding Crowd: Slow Innovators, Information Value and the Geography of Innovation.” Growth & Change 46 (3): 424–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R., and D. Doloreux. 2015. “KIBS Use and User Innovation: High-Order Services, Geographic Hierarchies and Internet Use in Quebec’s Manufacturing Sector.” Regional Studies 49 (10): 1654–1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storper, M., and A. Venables. 2004. “Buzz: Face-to-face Contact and the Urban Economy.” Journal of Economic Geography 4: 351–370.10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teirlinck, P., and A. Spithoven. 2008. “The Spatial Organization of Innovation: Open Innovation.” External Knowledge Relations and Urban Structure, Regional Studies 42 (5): 689–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2005. “One Size Fits All? Towards a Differential Regional Innovation Policy Approach” Research Policy 34: 1203–1219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, A. 2008. “On the Role Played by Temporary Geographical Proximity in Knowledge Transmission.” Regional Studies 42 (6): 869–889.10.1080/00343400801922814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wójcik, D. 2011. The Global Stock Market: Issuers, Investors and Intermediaries in an Uneven World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199592180.001.0001
   Google Scholar