Academic entrepreneuring as a long-term commitment to regional development

References

• Becattini, G., M. Bellandi, and L. De Propris, eds. 2009. Handbook of Industrial Districts. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, K., A. Alexandersson, M. Jogmark, and M. Tillmar. 2021. “An Alternative Entrepreneurial University?” In A Research Agenda for the Entrepreneurial University. Elgar Research Agendas, edited by U. Hytti, 7–28. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, K., B. Johannisson, and B. Schwartz, eds. 2012. Societal Entrepreneurship – Positioning, Penetrating, Promoting. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, Ma, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bispo, M.D.S., and A. Gherardi. 2019. “Flesh.and-blood Knowing. Interpreting Qualitative Data through Embodied Practice-based Research.” RAUSP Management Journal 54 (4): 371–383. doi:10.1108/RAUSP-04-2019-0066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2007. Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies. Malmö, Sweden: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges, B., and R Wolff. 1991. “Leaders, Managers, Entrepreneurs on and off the Organizational Stage“”. Organization Studies 12 (4): 529–546. doi:10.1177/017084069101200404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., T.E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnographay: An Overview.” Historical Social Research 36 (4): 273–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., and A. Bochner. 2000. “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, 733–768. Second ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P., U. Hytti, K. Komulainen, T. Montonen, and P. Siivonen, eds. 2021. New Movements in Academic Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA. USA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fayolle, A., and D. Redford, eds. 2014. Handbook on the Entrepreneurial University. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., and P. Desrochers. 2003. “Research Universities and Local Economic Development: Lessons from the History of the Johns Hopkins University.” Industry and Innovation 10 (1): 5–24. doi:10.1080/1366271032000068078.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., and W. Orlikowski. 2011. “Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory.” Organization Science 22 (5): 1240–1253. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, L., and D. Gibson, edited by. 2015. “The Entrepreneurial University.” In Context and Institutional Change. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, J., G. Hägg, H. Landström, and D. Politis. 2020. “Connecting the past with the Present: The Development of Research on Pedagogy in Entrepreneurial Education.” Education + Training 62 (9): 1061–1086. published online ahead-of-print 10.1108/ET-11-2019-0265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodheart, S. 2020. Head, Hand, Heart. Why Intelligence Is Over-Rewarded, Manual Workers Matter, and Caregivers Deserve More Respect. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hägg, G. 2017. “Experiential Entrepreneurship Education. Reflective Thinking as a Counterbalance to Action for Developing Entrepreneurial Knowledge.” Dissertation. Lund: Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Hayano, D. M. 1979. “”Auto-Ethnography: Paradigms. Problems and Prospects.” Human Society: Journal of the Society for Applied Anthropology 38 (1): 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorth, D. 2011. “On Provocation, Education and Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 23 (1–2): 49–63. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.540411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J., R. Thomson, and S. Henderson. 2006. “Qualitative Longitudinal Research: A Discussion Paper.” London, UK: South Bank University.
   Google Scholar
• Hytti, U., ed. 2021. A Research Agenda for the Entrepreneurial University. Elgar Research Agendas. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffrey, B., and G. Troman. 2004. “Time for Ethnography.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (4): 535–548. doi:10.1080/0141192042000237220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joas, H. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA, USA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B. 1991. “University Training for Entrepreneurship: Swedish Approaches.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 3 (1): 67–82. doi:10.1080/08985629100000005.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B. 2011. “Towards a Practice Theory of Entrepreneuring.” Small Business Economics 36 (2): 135–150. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9212-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B. 2018. Disclosing Entrepreneurhip as Practice. The Enactive Approach. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., O. Alexanderson, K. Nowicki, and K. Senneseth. 1994. “Beyond Anarchy and Organization: Entrepreneurs in Contextual Networks.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 6 (4): 329–356. doi:10.1080/08985629400000020.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., L. C. Caffarena, F. D. Cruz, M. Epure, E. M. Pérez, M. Kapelko, K. Murdock, et al. 2007. “Interstanding the Industrial District - Contrasting Conceptual Images as a Road to Insight.” Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 19 (6): 527–554. doi:10.1080/08985620701671882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., and A. Nilsson. 1989. “Community Entrepreneurship – Networking for Local Development.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 1 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/08985628900000002.
   Google Scholar
• Johannisson, B., M. Ramirez-Pasillas, and G. Karlsson. 2002. “Institutional Embeddedness of Inter-Firm Networks: A Leverage for Business Creation.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 14 (4): 297–315. doi:10.1080/08985620210142020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisafalvi, V. 2002. “The Entrepreneur’s Character,Life Issues and Strategy Making: A Field Study.” Journal of Business Venturing 17 (5): 489–518. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00075-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. 2014. “University Rankings and Social Science.” European Journal of Education 49 (1): 45–59. doi:10.1111/ejed.12061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mars, M., J. L. Bronstein, and R.F. Lusch. 2012. “The Value of Metaphor: Organizations and Metaphors.” Organizational Dynamics 41 (4): 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. 2020. The Uncontrollability of the World. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. 2015. “Wallas’ Four-Stage Model of the Creative Process: More than Meets the Eye?” Creativity Research Journal 27 (4): 342–352. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1087277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam, C., and P. van der Sijde. 2014. “Understanding the Concept of the Entrepreneurial University from the Perspective of Higher Education Models.” Higher Education 68 (6): 891–908. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9750-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., K. Knorr Cetina, and E. von Savigny, eds. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1943l987. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Sixth ed. London, UK: Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Seim, J. 2021. “Participant Observation, Observant Participation and Hybrid Ethnography.” Sociological Methods & Research 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C. 1997. “A Qualitative Methodology for Process Studies of Entrepreneurship.” International Studies of Management and Organization 27 (3): 13–33. doi:10.1080/00208825.1997.11656711.
   Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C. 2007. “Entrepreneuring as A Conceptual Attractor? A Review of Process Theories in 20 Years of Entrepreneurship Studies.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 19 (6): 453–477. doi:10.1080/08985620701671759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyaert, C. 2011. “Entrepreneurship as In(ter)vention: Reconsidering the Conceptual Politics of Method in Entrepreneurship Studies.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 23 (1–2): 77–88. doi:10.1080/08985626.2011.540416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanem, T., and D. Knights. 2019. Embodied Research Methods. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Maanen, J. 2011. Tales of the Field. On Writing Ethnography. Second ed. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verduijn, K., and I. Sabelis. 2021. “The Societally Entrepreneurial University.” In A Research Agenda for the Entrepreneurial University. Elgar Research Agendas, edited by U. Hytti, 29–42. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2015. “For a Sociology of Flesh and Blood.” Qualitative Sociology 38 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11133-014-9291-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. 1926. The Art of Thought. London, UK: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Welter, F. 2019. Entrepreneurship and Context. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Wigren, C. 2003. The Spirit of Gnosjö. The Grand Narrative and Beyond. Dissertation. Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.
   Google Scholar