A Qualitative Study of Non-Affiliated, Non-Scientist Institutional Review Board Members

References

• 45 C.F.R. 46 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Annas , G. 1996 . Questing for grails: Duplicity, betrayal, and self-deception in postmodern medical research . Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy , 12 ( 2 ) : 297 – 324 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer , P. E. 2001 . A few simple truths about your community IRB members . IRB: Ethics & Human Subjects Research , 23 ( 1 ) : 7 – 8 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell , J. , Whiton , J. and Connelly , S. 1998 . Final report: Evaluation of NIH implementation of section 491 of the Public Health Service Act, mandating a program of protection for research subjects , Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services . Report prepared under a National Institutes of Health Contract, NDI-OD-2-2109
   Google Scholar
• Cho , M. and Billings , P. 1997 . Conflict of interest and institutional review boards . Journal of Investigative Medicine , 45 ( 4 ) : 154 – 159 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (DHHS) . 1998a . Institutional Review Boards: A Time for Reform , Washington, DC : Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (DHHS) . 1998b . Institutional Review Boards: Promising Approaches , Washington, DC : Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (DHHS) . 1998c . Institutional Review Boards: Their Role in Reviewing Approved Research , Washington, DC : Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General .
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (DHHS) . 2000 . Protecting Human Research Subjects: Status of Recommendations , Washington, DC : Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General .
   Google Scholar
• DeVries , R. and Forsberg , C. P. 2002a . What do IRBs look like? What kind of support do they receive? . Accountability in Research , 9 ( 3–4 ) : 199 – 216 . [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeVries , R. and Forsberg , C. P. 2002b . Who decides? A look at ethics committee membership . HEC Forum , 14 ( 3 ) : 252 – 258 . [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dresser , R. 2001 . When Science Offers Salvation: Patient Advocacy and Research Ethics , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hayes , G. , Hayes , S. and Dykstra , T. 1995 . A survey of university institutional review boards: Characteristics, policies, and procedures . IRB: Ethics & Human Subjects Research , 17 ( 3 ) : 1 – 6 . [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karlawish , J. 1998 . Building right reason in the republic of science: Why we must include community values in the design and conduct of clinical research . PennBioethics , 5 ( 2 ) : 1 – 2 . 7[CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Knafl , K. and Webster , D. 1998 . Managing and analyzing qualitative data . Western Journal of Nursing Research , 10 ( 2 ) : 195 – 218 . [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Lombardo , P. 1999 . New faces on the IRB: Who speaks for subjects? . BioLaw 1999 Suppl , : 428 – 431 . [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen , K. , McLellan , E. , Metzger , D. , Kegeles , S. , Strauss , R. , Scotti , R. , Blanchard , L. and Trotter , R. T. 2001 . What is community? An evidence-based definition for public health . American Journal of Public Health , 91 ( 12 ) : 1929 – 1938 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill , P. M. 1993 . The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation , New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Morse , J. 1995 . The significance of saturation [editorial] . Qualitative Health Research , 5 ( 2 ) : 147 – 149 . [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) . 1999 . Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity , Bethesda, MD : National Bioethics Advisory Commission .
   Google Scholar
• National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC) . 2001 . Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants , Bethesda, MD : National Bioethics Advisory Commission .
   Google Scholar
• National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (National Commission) . 1978 . Report and Recommendations, Institutional Review Boards , Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare .
   Google Scholar
• Peckman , S. 2001 . “ Local institutional review boards ” . In National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants , Bethesda, MD : National Bioethics Research Commission . Appendix K. Commissioned Papers and Staff Analysis
   Google Scholar
• Penslar, R. L. (1993). Institutional Review Board Guidebook. Office for Human Research Protections http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/irb/irb_guidebook.htm (Accessed: 20 January 2006 ).
   Google Scholar
• Porter , J. 1986 . What are the ideal characteristics of unaffiliated/nonscientist IRB members . IRB: Ethics & Human Subjects Research , 8 ( 3 ) : 1 – 6 . [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porter , J. 1987 . How unaffiliated/non-scientist members of Institutional Review Boards see their roles, IRB . Ethics & Human Subjects Research , 9 ( 6 ) : 1 – 6 . [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (President’s Commission). (1983). Implementing Human Research Regulations: Second biennial report on the adequacy and uniformity of federal rules and policies, and of their implementation for the protection of human subjects
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta , S. and Lo , B. 2003 . The roles and experiences of nonaffiliated and non-scientist members of institutional review boards . Academic Medicine , 78 ( 2 ) : 212 – 218 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA] [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veatch , R. 1975 . Human experimentation committees: Professional or representative? . Hastings Center Report , 5 ( 5 ) : 31 – 40 . [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar