REFERENCES
- Amerasia Journal. (2011). Peer Review Guidelines. http://www.amerasiajournal.org/blog/?page_id=37 (http://www.amerasiajournal.org/blog/?page_id=37) (Accessed: 4 January 2011 ).
- Ashcroft , R. 2003 . Ethical issues in biomedical publications . Bioethics , 17 : 371 – 374 .
- Barber , B. 1961 . Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery . Science , 134 : 596 – 602 .
- Bennett , D. M. and Taylor , D. 2003 . Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers . Emergency Medicine , 15 : 263 – 270 .
- British Medical Journal (BMJ). (2011). Qualitative Research. http://resou-rces.bmj.com/authors/checklists-forms/qualitative-research (http://resou-rces.bmj.com/authors/checklists-forms/qualitative-research) (Accessed: 3 January 2011 ).
- Borry , P. , Schotsman , P. and Dierickx , K. 2006 . Author, contributor or just a signer? A quantitative analysis of authorship trends in the field of bioethics . Bioethics , 20 : 213 – 220 .
- Bower , B. 1991 . Peer review under fire: Science's gatekeeping system may need an overhaul . Science News , 139 : 394 – 395 .
- Ceci , S. J. and Peters , D. P. 1982 . Peer review: A study of reliability . Change , 14 : 44 – 48 .
- Chubin , D. E. and Hackett , E. J. 1990 . Peerless Science: Peer Review and the U.S. Science Policy , New York : State University of New York Press .
- Clark , J. P. 2003 . “ How to peer review a qualitative manuscript ” . In Peer Review in Health Sciences , Second , Edited by: Godlee , F and Jefferson , T. London : BMJ Publishing Group .
- Cole , S. , Cole , J. R. and Simon , G. A. 1981 . Chance and consensus in peer review . Science , 214 : 881 – 886 .
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (1999). Guidelines on Good Publication Practice. http://publicationethics.org/static/1999/1999pdf13.pdf (http://publicationethics.org/static/1999/1999pdf13.pdf) (Accessed: 31 October 2010 ).
- Creswell , J. W. and Miller , D. L. 2000 . Determining validity in qualitative inquiry . Theory into Practice , 39 : 124 – 130 .
- Center for Scientific Review. (2007). What Happens to Your Grant Application: A Primer for New Applicants. http://cms.csr.nih.gov/nr/rdonlyres/ed6fc446-a716-4f21-b25b-dafa238e5707/16443/whathappenstoyourgrantapplicationflyer101209.pdf (http://cms.csr.nih.gov/nr/rdonlyres/ed6fc446-a716-4f21-b25b-dafa238e5707/16443/whathappenstoyourgrantapplicationflyer101209.pdf) (Accessed: 6 January 2011 ).
- Center for Scientific Review. (2011). Roster Index for Regular Standing Study Sections and Continuing SEPs http://www.csr.nih.gov/Roster_proto/sectionI.asp (http://www.csr.nih.gov/Roster_proto/sectionI.asp) (Accessed: 2 January 2011 ).
- Dhaliwal , U. , Singh , N. and Bhatia , A. 2006 . Awareness of authorship criteria and conflict: Survey in a medical institution in India . Medscape General Medicine , 8 : 52
- Drenth , J. P. H. 1996 . Proliferation of authors on research reports in medicine . Science and Engineering Ethics , 2 : 469 – 480 .
- Elliott , C. 2004 . Six problems with pharma-funded bioethics . Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Science , 35 : 125 – 129 .
- Elliott , C. 2007 . “ The tyranny of expertise ” . In Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape , Edited by: Eckenwiler , L. A. and Cohn , F. G. Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press .
- Emanuel , E. J. , Wendler , D. and Grady , C. 2000 . What makes clinical research ethical? . Journal of the American Medical Association , 283 : 2701 – 2711 .
- EMBO Molecular Medicine . 2010 . Instructions to reviewers . EMBO Molecular Medicine , 2 : A1 – A5 .
- Endersby , J. W. 1996 . Collaborative research in the social sciences: multiple authorship and publication credit . Social Science Quarterly , 77 : 375 – 392 .
- Erlen , J. A. , Siminoff , L. A. , Sereika , S. M. and Sutton , L. B. 1997 . Multiple authorship: Issues and recommendations . Journal of Professional Nursing , 13 : 262 – 270 .
- Fisher , B. S. , Cobane , C. T. , Vander Ven , T. M. and Cullen , F. T. 1998 . How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science . Political Science and Politics , 31 : 847 – 856 .
- Flanagin , A. , Carey , L. A. , Fontanarosa , P. B. , Phillips , S. G. , Pace , B. P. , Lundberg , G. D. and Rennie , D. 1998 . Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals . Journal of the American Medical Association , 280 : 222 – 224 .
- Freedman , B. 1987 . Scientific value and validity as ethical requirements for Research: A proposed explication . IRB , 9 : 7 – 10 .
- Guetzkow , J. , Samont , M. and Mallard , G. 2004 . What is originality in the humanities and the social sciences? . American Sociological Review , 69 : 190 – 212 .
- Hudson , J. 1996 . Trends in multi-authored papers in economics . The Journal of Economic Perspectives , 10 : 153 – 158 .
- Ilakovac , V. , Fister , K. , Marusic , M. and Marusic , A. 2007 . Reliability of disclosure forms of authors’ contributions . Canadian Medical Association Journal , 176 : 41 – 46 .
- Institute of Medicine and National Research Council . 2002 . Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct , Washington, D.C : The National Academies Press .
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2010). Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf (http://www.icmje.org/urm_full.pdf) (Accessed: 31 October 2010 ).
- Jones , A. H. 2000 . “ Changing traditions of authorship ” . In Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication , Edited by: Jones , A. H. and McLellan , F. Baltimore : The Johns Hopkins University Press .
- Johnson , R. H. and Blair , J. A. 1993 . Logical Self-Defense , Third , Toronto : McGraw-Hill Ryerson .
- King , J. T. Jr. 2000 . How many neurosurgeons does it take to write a research article? Authorship proliferation in neurosurgical research . Neurosurgery , 47 : 435 – 440 .
- Kuhn , T. S. 1996 . The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , Third , Chicago : The University of Chicago Press .
- LaFollette , M. C. 1992 . Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing , Los Angeles : University of California Press .
- Langfeldt , L. 2006 . The policy challenges of peer review: managing bias, conflicts of interests, and interdisciplinary assessments . Research Evaluation , 15 : 31 – 41 .
- Langfeldt, L. and Brofoss, K. E. (2005). Evaluation of the European Young Investigator Award Scheme. NIFU STEP. Norwegian Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education. http://www.nifustep.no/Norway/Publications/2005/Arbeidsnotat_10-2005.pdf (http://www.nifustep.no/Norway/Publications/2005/Arbeidsnotat_10-2005.pdf) (Accessed: 31 October 2010 ).
- Laudel , G. 2006 . Conclave in the tower of Babel: How peers review interdisciplinary research proposals . Research Evaluation , 15 : 57 – 68 .
- Lee , C. J. and Schunn , C. D. 2010 . Philosophy journal practices and opportunities for bias . American Philosophical Association Newsletters , 10 : 5 – 10 .
- Mansilla, V. B. and Gardner, H. (2003). Assessing Interdisciplinary Work at the Frontier: An Empirical Exploration of “Symptoms of Quality.” http://pzweb.harvard.edu/interdisciplinary/pdf/VBM-Gardner_AssessingSymptoms_2003.pdf (http://pzweb.harvard.edu/interdisciplinary/pdf/VBM-Gardner_AssessingSymptoms_2003.pdf) (Accessed: 11 January 2011 ).
- Manton , E. J. and English , D. E. 2007 . The trend toward multiple authorship in business journals . Journal of Education for Business , 82 : 164 – 168 .
- Martinson , B. C. , Anderson , M. S. and de Vries , R. 2005 . Scientists behaving badly . Nature , 435 : 237 – 238 .
- McDonald , R. J. , Neff , K. L. , Rethlefsen , M. L. and Kallmes , D. F. 2010 . Effects of author contribution disclosures and numeric limitations on authorship trends . Mayo Clinical Proceedings , 85 : 920 – 927 .
- Morse , J. M. 2003 . A review committee's guide for evaluating qualitative proposals . Qualitative Health Research , 13 : 833 – 851 .
- Nature . 2009 . No ethics, no grant . Nature , 461 : 433
- National Academy of Sciences (NAS), National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2004). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153.html (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11153.html) (Accessed: 11 January 2011 ).
- National Institutes of Health (NIH). (2009). Update on the Requirement for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html) (Accessed: 31 October 2010 ).
- National Institutes of Health (NIH).(2010). Peer Review Process. August 30, 2010 http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer_review_process.htm (http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer_review_process.htm) (Accessed: 31 December 2010 ).
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. (2011). Guide for Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine Reviewers. http://www.peh-med/about/reviewers (http://www.peh-med/about/reviewers) (Accessed: 4 January 2011 ).
- Porter , A. L. and Rossini , F. A. 1985 . Peer review of interdisciplinary research proposals . Science, Technology, and Human Values , 10 : 33 – 38 .
- Regalado , A. 1995 . Multiauthor papers on the rise . Science , 268 : 25
- Rennie , D. , Yank , V. and Emanuel , L. 1997 . When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable . Journal of the American Medical Association , 278 : 579 – 585 .
- Resnik , D. B. 1997 . A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science . Science and Engineering Ethics , 3 : 237 – 243 .
- Resnik , D. B. 1998 . The Ethics of Science: An Introduction , New York : Routledge .
- Resnik , D. B. , Gutierrez-Ford , C. and Peddada , S. 2008 . Perceptions of ethical problems with scientific journal peer review: An exploratory study . Science and Engineering Ethics , 14 : 305 – 310 .
- Resnik , D. B. and Master , Z. 2011 . Authorship policies of bioethics journals . Journal of Medical Ethics. , In Press.
- Rheumatology. (2011). Guidelines for Reviewers. http://www.oxford-journals.org/our_journals/brheum/for_authors/reviewer_guidelines.html (http://www.oxford-journals.org/our_journals/brheum/for_authors/reviewer_guidelines.html) (Accessed: 1 January 2011 ).
- Rinia , E. J. , van Leeuwen , Th. N , van Vuren , H. G. and van Raan , A. F. J. 2001 . Influence of interdisciplinarity on peer-review and bibliometric evaluations in physics research . Research Policy , 30 : 357 – 361 .
- Russell , M. G. 1983 . “ Peer review in interdisciplinary research: Flexibility and responsiveness ” . In Managing Interdisciplinary Research , Edited by: Epton , S. R. , Payne , R. L. and Pearson , A. W. New York : John Wiley & Sons .
- Shamoo , A. E. and Resnik , D. B. 2009 . Responsible Conduct of Research , Second , New York : Oxford University Press .
- Spielman , B. J. 2007 . Bioethics in Law , Totowa : Humana Press .
- Sugarman , J. and Sulmasy , D. P. , eds. 2001 . Methods in Medical Ethics , Washington, D.C : Georgetown University Press .
- Social Science and Medicine. (2010). Guidelines for Qualitative Papers. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/authorinstructions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/authorinstructions) (Accessed: 1 January 2011 ).
- van Praag , C. M. and van Praag , B. M. S. 2008 . The benefits of being economics professor A (rather than Z) . Economica , 75 : 782 – 796 .
- Weeks , W. B. , Wallace , A. E. and Kimberly , B. C. S. 2004 . Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious U.S. medical journals . Social Science and Medicine , 59 : 1949 – 1954 .
- Wenneras , C. and Wold , A. 1997 . Nepotism and sexism in peer-review . Nature , 387 : 341 – 343 .
- Wilcox , L. J. 1998 . Authorship: The coin of the realm, the source of complaints . Journal of the American Medical Association , 280 : 216 – 217 .
- Zbar , A. and Frank , E. 2011 . Significance of authorship position: An open-ended international assessment . The American Journal of the Medical Sciences , 341 : 106 – 109 .
- Zuckerman , H. and Merton , R. K. 1971 . Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system . Minerva , 9 : 66 – 100 .