Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 21, 2014 - Issue 5
360
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Improving Ethical Knowledge and Sensemaking from Cases through Elaborative Interrogation and Outcome Valence

, M.S., , M.S., , M.S., , B.A., , Ph.D., , Ph.D. & , Ph.D. show all

References

  • Anderson, R. C., and Biddle, W. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In Bower, G. ( Ed.). Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 9, pp. 90–132. New York: Academic Press.
  • Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R., and Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82:853–860.
  • Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L. N., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., MacDougall, A. E., Devenport, L. D., Connelly, S., Mumford, M. D., and Peacock, J. (2012). An investigation of case-based instructional strategies on learning, retention, and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7:79–86.
  • Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., and Connelly, S. (in press). From theory to application: What’s behind case-based ethics training? Ethics Training in Action. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., and Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3):1305–1322.
  • Brock, M. E., Vert, A., Kligyte, V., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., and Mumford, M. D. (2008). Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14:449–472.
  • Connelly, S., Allen, M. T., and Waples, E. (2007). The impact of content and structure on a case-based approach to developing leadership skills. International Journal of Learning and Change, 2:218–249.
  • Dailey, L. and Mumford, M. D. (2006). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Errors in appraising the implications of new ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 18:385–390.
  • Dorner, D. and Schaub, H. (1994). Errors in planning and decision-making and the nature of human information processing. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43:433–453.
  • Falkenberg, L. and Woiceshyn, J. (2008). Enhancing business ethics: Using cases to teach moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 79:213–217.
  • Fatehi-Sedeh, K. (1982). A practical approach to business policy case preparation and use. Journal of Management Education, 7:41–43.
  • Forrester, J. and Oldham, M. (1981). The use of case studies in pre-experience business education. Part II: Using case studies effectively. The Vocational Aspect of Education, 33:67–71.
  • Garvin, D. A. (2003). Making the case: Professional education for the world of practice. Harvard Magazine, 105:56–65; 107.
  • Garvin, D. A. (2004). The case method in professional education. Faculty Seminar Series. Boston: Harvard Business School. CD-ROM.
  • Gaudine, A. and Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31:175–187.
  • Hamilton, R. J. (1997). Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22:299–318.
  • Hamilton, R. J. (1999). The role of elaboration within a text processing and text adjunct context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69:363–376.
  • Harkrider, L. N., Bagdasarov, Z., MacDougall, A. E., Johnson, J. F., Devenport, L. D., and Mumford, M. D. (2013a). Improving case-based learning with clear content and simple presentation. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 13:n.p.
  • Harkrider, L. N., MacDougall, A. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., and Devenport, L. D. (2013b). Improving case-based ethics training: How modeling behaviors and forecasting influence effectiveness. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1–25.
  • Harkrider, L. N., MacDougall, A., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J., F., Thiel, C. E., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., and Devenport, L. D. (2013c). Structuring case-based ethics training: How comparing cases and structured prompts influence training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 23:179–198.
  • Harkrider, L. N., Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Mumford, M. D., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., and Devenport, L. D. (2012). Improving case-based ethics training with codes of conduct and forecasting content. Ethics and Behavior, 22:258–280.
  • Johnson, J. F., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L. N., MacDougall, A. E., Connelly, S., Devenport, L. D., and Mumford, M. D. (2013). The effects of note-taking and review on sensemaking and ethical decision-making. Ethics and Behavior, 23:299–323.
  • Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., and Mumford, M. D. (2012). Case-based ethics education: The impact of cause complexity and outcome favorability on ethicality. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7:63–77.
  • Kim, S., William, P. R., Pinsky, L., Brock, D., Phillips, K., and Keary, J. (2006). A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: A review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Medical Education, 40:867–876.
  • King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27:111–126.
  • Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy: A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52:57–66.
  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., and Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 12:495–547.
  • Kolodner, J. L., Owensby, J. N., and Guzdial, M. (2004). Case-based learning aids. In Jonassen, D. H. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Second ed., pp. 829–861. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Laditka, S. B. and Houck, M. M. (2006). Student-developed case studies: An experiential approach for teaching ethics in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 64:157–167.
  • Levin, J. R. (1988). Elaboration-based learning strategies: Powerful theory—powerful application. Contemporary Education Psychology, 13:191–205.
  • MacDougall, A. E., Harkrider, L. N., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., Peacock, J., Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., and Connelly, S. (2014). Examining the effects of incremental case building and forecasting outcomes on case-based ethics instruction. Ethics and Behavior, 24:126–150.
  • Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., and de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435:737–738.
  • Mayer, R. E. (1980). Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical text: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72:770–784.
  • McGee, R., Almquist, J., Keller, J. L., and Jacobsen, S. J. (2008). Teaching and learning responsible research conduct: Influences of prior experiences on acceptance of new ideas. Accountability in Research, 15:30–62.
  • McWilliams, V. and Nahavandi, A. (2006). Using live cases to teach ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 67:421–433.
  • Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Waples, E. P., and Devenport, L. D. (2008). Sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18:315–339.
  • Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, M. S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., and Antes, A. L. (2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16:319–345.
  • Mumford, M. D., Friedrich, T. L., Caughron, J. J., and Byrne, C. L. (2007). Leader cognition in real-world settings: How do leaders think about crises? The Leadership Quarterly, 18:515–543.
  • Mumford, M. D., Lonergan, D. C., and Scott, G. M. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Critical Inquiry, 22:21–30.
  • Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., and Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5:225–251.
  • Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1:117–175.
  • Patalano, A. L. and Siefert, C. M. (1997). Opportunistic planning: Being reminded of pending goals. Cognitive Psychology, 34:1–36.
  • Peacock, H. J., Harkrider, L. N., Bagdasarov, Z., Connelly, S., Johnson, J. F., Thiel, C. E., MacDougall, A. E., Mumford, M. D., and Devenport, L. D. (2013). Effects of alternative outcome scenarios and structured outcome evaluation on case-based ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3):1283–1303.
  • Pressley, M. and Bryant, S. L. (1982). Does answering questions really promote associative learning? Child Development, 53:1258–1267.
  • Pressley, M. and Levin, J. R. (1987). Elaborative learning strategies for the inefficient learner. In Ceci, S. J. ( Ed.). Handbook of Cognitive, Social, and Neuropsychological Aspects of Learning Disabilities. Vol. 2, pp. 175–212. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Pressley, M., Levin, J. R., and Delaney, H. D. (1982). The mnemonic keyword method. Review of Educational Research, 52:61–91.
  • Pressley, M., McDaniel, M. A., Turnure, J. E., Wood, E., and Ahmad, M. (1987). Generation and precision of elaboration: Effects on intentional and incidental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13:291–300.
  • Pressley, M., Symons, S., McDaniel, M. A., and Snyder, B. L. (1988). Elaborative interrogation facilitates acquisition of confusing facts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80:268–278.
  • Seifert, T. (1993). Effects of elaborative interrogation with prose passages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85:642–651.
  • Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 4:1022–1040.
  • Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Thiel, C. E., Caughron, J. J., Xiaoqian, W., and Mumford, M. D. (2011). Consequence identification in forecasting and ethical decision-making. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6:25–32.
  • The Office of Research Integrity (2011, November 9). Historical Background. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, The Office of Research Integrity Website. Available at http://ori.hhs.gov/historical-background Last accessed September 15, 2013.
  • Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L., Devenport, L. D., Bagdasarov, Z., Johnson, J. F., and Mumford, M. D. (2013). Case-based knowledge and ethics education: Improving learning and transfer through emotionally rich cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1):265–286.
  • Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., and Gioia D. A. (1993). Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: Linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36:239–270.
  • Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., and Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14:163–178.
  • Vollmer, S. and Matchett, N. J. (2008). Incorporating ethics into RCR courses. Office of Research Integrity Newsletter, 15:1, 5.
  • Weick, K. E. (1988). Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations. Journal of Management Studies, 25:305–317.
  • Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Werhane, P. H. (2002). Moral imagination and systems thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 38:33–42.
  • Willoughby, T., Wood, E., and Khan, M. (1994). Isolating variables that impact on or detract from the effectiveness of elaboration strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86:279–289.
  • Willoughby, T., Wood, E., McDermott, C., and McLaren, J. (2000). Enhancing learning through strategy instruction and group interaction: Is active generation of elaborations critical? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14:19–30.
  • Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11:87–95.
  • Williams, S. M. (1992). Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(4):367–427.
  • Woloshyn, V. E., Willoughby, T., Wood, E., and Pressley, M. (1990). Elaborative interrogation facilitates adult learning of factual paragraphs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82: 513–524.
  • Xiao, Y., Milgram, P., and Doyle, D. J. (1997). Capturing and modeling planning expertise in anesthesiology: Results of a field study. In Zsambok, C. E., and Klein, G. ( Eds.). Naturalistic Decision Making. pp. 197–205. Hillside, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.