A Core-Item Reviewer Evaluation (CoRE) System for Manuscript Peer Review

REFERENCES

• Abbott , A. 2011 . A how-to for peer review . Nature , 473 : 17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomme , E. A. 2011 . The ARRIVE guidelines: A resource for authors and reviewers to ensure that submissions to The Veterinary Journal meet minimal expectations of completeness, accuracy and transparency . Vet. J , 189 : 237 – 238 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion , M. A. 1993 . Article review checklist: A criterion checklist for reviewing research articles in applied psychology . Personnel Psychology , 46 : 705 – 718 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curzon , M. E. and Cleaton-Jones , P. E. 2011 . Reviewing scientific manuscripts . Eur. Arch. Paediatr. Dent. , 12 : 184 – 187 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duchesne , S. and Jannin , P. 2008 . Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist . Neuroimage , 39 : 1783 – 1787 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heddle , N. M. and Ness , P. M. 2009 . Reviewing manuscripts: Tips and responsibilities . Transfusion , 49 : 2265 – 2268 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henly , S. J. and Dougherty , M. C. 2009 . Quality of manuscript reviews in nursing research . Nurs. Outlook , 57 : 18 – 26 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loonen , M. P. , Hage , J. J. and Kon , M. 2005 . Who benefits from peer review? An analysis of the outcome of 100 requests for review by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery . Plast. Reconstr. Surg. , 116 : 1473 – 1475 . 14611472Discussion
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onitilo , A. A. , Engel , J. M. , Salzman-Scott , S. A. , Stankowski , R. V. and Doi , S. A. 2013 . Reliability of reviewer ratings in the manuscript peer review process: An opportunity for improvement . Account. Res. , 20(4) : 270 – 284 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajesh , A. , Cloud , G. and Harisinghani , M. G. 2013 . Improving the quality of manuscript reviews: Impact of introducing a structured electronic template to submit reviews . Am. J. Roentgenol. , 200 : 20 – 23 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramulu , V. G. , Levine , R. B. , Hebert , R. S. and Wright , S. M. 2005 . Development of a case report review instrument . Int. J. Clin. Pract. , 59 : 457 – 461 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa , J. A. , Mehta , P. , Thomas , D. C. , Berland , G. , Gross , C. , McNamara , R. L. , Rosenthal , R. , Udelsman , R. , Bravata , D. M. and Roman , S. A. 2009 . Evaluating the surgery literature: Can standardizing peer-review today predict manuscript impact tomorrow? . Ann. Surg , 250 : 152 – 158 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starbuck , W. H. 2003 . Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews? . Journal of Management Inquiry , 12 : 344 – 351 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strayhorn , J. Jr , McDermott , J. F. Jr. and Tanguay , P. 1993 . An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Am . J. Psychiatry , 150 : 947 – 952 .
   Google Scholar