Paving the Road to Negligence: The Compensation for Research-Related Injuries in Spain

REFERENCES

• Beauchamp, T. L. and Childress, J. F. (2002). Principios de Ética Biomédica. Barcelona: Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Childress, J. (1976). Compensating Injured Research Subjects: I. The moral argument. The Hastings Center Report, 6:21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. J. (1980). Compensation for human research subjects: Reform ahead of its time? The Journal of Legal Medicine, 2(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D. W., and Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA, 238:2701–2711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, B., and Glass, K. C. (1990). Weiss v. Salomon: A case study in institutional responsability for clinical research. Law, Medicine and Health Care, 18:395–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gainotti, S. and Petrini, C. (2010). Insurance policies for clinical trials in the United States and in some European countries. Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics, 1:1, doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000101.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, M. and Hartmann-Vareilles, F. (2012). Concepts for the risk-based regulation of clinical research on medicines and medical devices. Drug Information Journal, 46(5):545–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, I. and Chadwick, R. (1992). Compensation for harm: The implications for medical research. Social Science and Medicine, 34(12):1399–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havighurst, C. (1970). Compensating persons injured in human experimentation. Science, 169:153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson, R. L. (2003). Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: Informed consent and researcher malpractice actions. Washington Law Review, 78:229–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladimer, I. (1963). Clinical research insurance. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 16:1229–1235.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levine, R. J. (1979). Clarifying the concepts of research ethics. The Hastings Center Report, 9(3):21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrimer, W. K. (1994). “Compensation for Research Injuries.” Women and Health Research. Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies. Vol. 2, Mastroiani, A. C., Faden, R., and Federman, D. ( ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Academy; pp. 113–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, M. M., Studdert, D. M., and Brennan, T. A. (2003). The rise of litigation in human subject research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 139:40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer Henry, L. (2013). Moral gridlock: Conceptual barriers to no-fault compensation for injured research subjects. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 41:411–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morreim, E. H. (2003). Medical research litigation and malpractice tort doctrines: Courts on a learning curve. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy, 4:1–86.
   Google Scholar
• National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants. Vol. 1: Reports and Recommendations. Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Noah, B. A. (2004). Bioethical malpractice: Risk and responsibility in human research. Journal of Health Care Law and Policy, 7(2):175–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paasche-Orlow, M. K. and Brancati, F. L. (2005). Assessment of medical school Institutional Review Board policies regarding compensation of subjects for research-related injury. The American Journal of Medicine, 118:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Taylor, M. K., and Brancati, F. L. (2003). Readability standards for informed-consent forms a compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine, 348:721–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, E. R. (2012). Recovering from research: A no-fault proposal to compensate injured research participants. American Journal of Law and Medicine, 38:7–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1982). Compensating for Research Injuries-–The Ethical and Legal Implications of Programs to Redress Injured Subjects. Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. (2004). Liability for Institutional Review Boards. From regulation to litigation. Journal of Legal Medicine, 25:131–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. (2006). Compensation for research-related injuries. Ethical and legal issues. Journal of Legal Medicine, 27:263–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettig, R. A. (2000). The Industrialization of Clinical Research. Health Affairs, 19(2):129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rid, A. and Wendler, D. (2011). A framework for risk-benefit evaluations in biomedical research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 21(2):141–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, L. D. (2003). Research-related injury: Problems and solutions. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 31:419–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, E. and Müllner, M. (2002). Implications of the EU directive on clinical trials for emergency medicine. British Medical Journal, 324:1169–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbrook, R. (2006). Compensation for injured research subjects. New England Journal of Medicine, 354:1871–1873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studdert, D. M. and Brennan, T. A. (2001). No-fault compensation for medical injuries. JAMA, 280(2):217–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWalde, A. and Kurzban, S. (2011). Paying human subjects in research: Where are we, how did we get here, and now what? The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 39:543–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasgird, D. R., Hensleigh, M., Berkman, A., and Trinh, C. (2000). Protecting the uninsured human research subject. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 6(6):37–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar