REFERENCES
- Anderson, M. S., Martinson, B. C., and De Vries, R. (2007). Normative dissonance in science: results from a national survey of U.S. Scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2:3–14.
- Crain, A. L., Martinson, B. C., and Thrush, C. R. (2013). Relationships between the survey of organizational research climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19:835–850.
- Eisen, J. A., Ganley, E., and MacCallum, C. J. (2014). Open science and reporting animal studies: who’s accountable? PLoS Biology, 12(1):e1001757. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001757.
- Fanelli, D. (2013). Redefine misconduct as distorted reporting. Nature, 494:149.
- Fanelli, D. and Ioannidis J. P. (2013). U.S. studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110:15031–15036.
- Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., and Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109:17028–17033.
- Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2:e124.
- Kalichman, M. (2014). Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 21:68–83.
- Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., and de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435:737–738.
- Master, Z. (2011). Responsible conduct of bioethics research. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 18:102–119.
- Price, A. R. (2013). Research misconduct and its federal regulation: The origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity-with personal views of ORI’s former Associate Director for Investigative Oversight. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 20:291–319.
- Redman, B. K. (2013). Research Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad-Apple Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Rennie, D. (1989). Editors and auditors. Journal of the American Medical Association, 261:2543–2545.
- Resnik, D. B. and Dinse, G. E. (2013). Scientific retractions and corrections related to misconduct findings. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39:46–50.
- Resnik, D. B. and Dinse, G. E. (2012). Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey. Academic Medicine, 87:1237–1242.
- Resnik, D. B. and Master, Z. (2013). Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high income countries. PLoS Medicine, 10(3):e1001406.
- Shamoo, A. and Annau, Z. (1987). Ensuring scientific integrity. Nature, 327:550.
- Shamoo, A. E. (2013). Data audit as a way to prevent/contain misconduct. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 20:369–379.
- Steneck, N. H. and Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82:829–834.
- Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., and Rhoades, L. J. (2008). Repairing research integrity. Nature, 453:980–982.