Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 22, 2015 - Issue 5
223
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letters to the Editor

Research Ethics Committee: Dominance and Accountability

, M.D. & , M.D.

REFERENCES

  • Coburn, D. (1992). Freidson then and now: An “internalist” critique of Freidson’s past and present views of the medical profession. Int. J. Health Serv., 22:497–512.
  • de Lecuona, I. (2013). International regulation of ethics committees on biomedical research as protection mechanisms for people: Analysis of the Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning Biomedical Research of the Council of Europe. Rev. Derecho. Genoma Hum., 38:71–123.
  • Guillemin, M., Gillam, L., Rosenthal, D., and Bolitho, A. (2012). Human research ethics committees: Examining their roles and practices. J. Empir. Res. Hum. Res. Ethics, 7:38–49.
  • Humphreys, S., Thomas, H., and Martin, R. (2014). Medical dominance within research ethics committees. Account. Res., 21:366–388.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.