REFERENCES
- Allen, L., Scott, J., Brand, A., Hlava, M., and Altman, M. (2014). Publishing: Credit where credit is due. Nature, 508(7496). Available at http://www.nature.com/news/publishing-credit-where-credit-is-due-1.15033. Last accessed June 20, 2014.
- American Institute of Physics (AIP). Statement of ethics and responsibilities of authors submitting to AIP journals. Available at http://publishing.aip.org/publishing/authors/ethics. Last accessed June 20, 2014.
- ATLAS Collaboration, et al. (2012). Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Physics Letters B, 716(1): 1–29.
- Attribution and Accountability. (2009). Nature Cell Biology, 11: 667. doi:10.1038/ncb0609-667b.
- Barbour, V. (2010). How ghost-writing threatens the credibility of medical knowledge and medical journals. Haematologica, 95(1): 1–2. doi:10.3324/haematol.2009.017426.
- Bates, T., Anić, A., Marusić, M., and Marusić, A. (2004). Authorship criteria and disclosure of contributions: Comparison of 3 general medical journals with different author contribution forms. JAMA, 292(1): 86–88.
- British Medical Journal (BMJ). Available at http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-authors/article-submission/authorship-contributorship. Last accessed June 20, 2014.
- Cambridge Journals. Instructions for Contributors. Available at http://journals.cambridge.org/action/browseJournalsIfc. Last accessed June 20, 2014.
- Claxton, L. D. (2005a). Scientific authorship. Part 1. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research, 589(1): 17–30.
- Claxton, L. D. (2005b). Scientific authorship. Part 2. History, recurring issues, practices, and guidelines. Mutation Research, 589(1): 31–45.
- Clement, T. P. (2014). Authorship matrix: A rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20: 345–361.
- Dance, A. (2012). Authorship: Who’s on first? Nature, 489: 591–593. doi:10.1038/nj7417-591a.
- Degnan, D. A., and Huskey, L. A. (2006). Inventorship: What Happens When You Don’t Get It Right. Holland & Hart LLP. Available at http://www.hollandhart.com/files/Publication/c61a859b-4515-4ae5-9b0d-ea5df0761f79/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/142a44bb-f91b-4bb8-bc54-4d9dbd9447b9/InventorshipWhatHappens.pdf. Last accessed June 20, 2014.
- Flanagin, A., Carey, L. A., Fontanarosa, P. B., Phillips, S. G., Pace, B. P., Lundberg, G. D., and Rennie, D. (1998). Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA, 280(3): 222–224.
- Friedman, P. J. (1997). Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science.” Science and Engineering Ethics, 3(3): 245–248.
- Frische, S. (2012). It is time for full disclosure of author contributions. Nature, 489: 475. Available at http://www.nature.com/news/it-is-time-for-full-disclosure-of-author-contributions-1.11475. Last accessed August 22, 2014.
- Haeussler, C., and Sauermann, H. (2013). Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Research Policy 42: 688–703.
- Harris, C. E., Jr., Pritchard, M. S., and Rabins, M. J. (2009). Engineering Ethics: Concepts & Cases (4th edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
- Heitman, E., and Litewka, S. (2011). International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology 29(1): 104–8. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.014.
- House, M. C., and Seeman, J. I. (2010). Credit and authorship practices: educational and environmental influences. Accountability in Research 17(5): 223–256.
- IEEE. (2014). IEEE Publication Services and Products Board Operations Manual 2014. http://www.ieee.org/documents/opsmanual.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Institute of International Education (IIE). (2013). Top 25 Places of Origin of International Students, 2011/12-2012/13. Open Doors Report on International Educational Exchange. http://iie.org/Research-and-Publications/Open-Doors/Data/International-Students/Leading-Places-of-Origin/2011-13. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- IWCSA Report (2012). Report on the International Workshop on Contributorship and Scholarly Attribution, May 16. Harvard University and the Wellcome Trust. http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/attribution_workshop. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). (2014). JAMA instructions for authors. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/public/instructionsForAuthors.aspx. Accessed August 29, 2014.
- King, C. (2012). Multiauthor papers: onward and upward. ScienceWatch Newsletter. http://archive.sciencewatch.com/newsletter/2012/201207/multiauthor_papers/. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Knoll, E. (1997). Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 3(3): 251–253.
- Lissoni, F., Montobbio, F., and Zirulia, L. (2013). Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiryinto the economics of scientific credit. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 95: 49–69.
- Logdberg, L. (2011). Being the ghost in the machine: A medical ghostwriter’s personal view. PLoS Medicine 8(8): e1001071. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001071.
- Ma, X., and Song, Z. (2013). Impact: China needs to review its metrics. Nature 503: 198. doi:10.1038/503198c.
- Matheson, A. (2011). How industry uses the ICMJE guidelines to manipulate authorship—and how they should be revised. PLoS Med 8(8): e1001072. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001072.
- Merriam-Webster. Author. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/author. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross – Boundary Research Collaborations. (2013). 3rd World Conference on Research Integrity, May 5–8. http://www.cehd.umn.edu/olpd/MontrealStatement.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., and de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435: 737–738.
- Marušić, A., Bošnjak, L., and Jerončić, A. (2011). A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS ONE 6(9): e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
- National Postdoctoral Association. RCR Toolkit: Research Misconduct. http://www.nationalpostdoc.org/component/content/article/3-publications/rcr-toolkit/114-rcr-toolkit-misconduct. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Nature. (2014). Nature journals’ authorship policy. http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/authorship.html. Accessed August 2, 2014.
- Nature Cell Biology. (2014). Guide to Authors and Referees. http://www.nature.com/ncb/pdf/ncb_gta.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- ORCID. What is ORCID? http://orcid.org/content/initiative. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Patent Lens. “I am an author on the paper… why am I not an inventor?” http://www.bios.net/daisy/patentlens/g4/tutorials/205.html. Accessed June 20, 2014.
- Rennie, D. (1997). Commentary on “a proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 3(3): 257–259.
- Rennie, D. (2001). Who did what? Authorship and contribution in 2001. Muscle Nerve 24: 1274–1277.
- Rennie, D., Yank, V., and Emanuel, L. (1997). When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA 278(7): 579–85.
- Resnik, D. B. (2006). A survey of research practices at the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences. Proceedings from 2006 ORI Conference on Research on Research Integrity. Potomac, MD: ORI.
- Resnik, D. B. (1997). A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science. Science and Engineering Ethics 3: 237–243.
- Scheetz, M. (1999). Office of Research Integrity: A reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Croatian Medical Journal 40: 321–325.
- Seeman, J. I. and House, M. C. (2010). Influences on authorship issues: An evaluation of receiving, not receiving, and rejecting credit. Accountability in Research 17(4): 176–197.
- Shamoo, A. E., and Resnik, D. B. (2003). Responsible Conduct of Research (1st edition). Oxford University Press.
- Shamoo, A. E., and Resnik, D. B. (2009). Responsible Conduct of Research (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.
- Smith, E., and Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics 18(2): 199–212.
- Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2011). The ethics of collaborative authorship. EMBO Reports 12(9): 889–893.
- Timber, M. B., and Dickersin, K. (2004). Publication of clinical trials: Accountability and accessibility. Journal of Internal Medicine 256: 271–283.
- Vasconcelos, S., Leta J., Costa L., Pinto, A., and Sorenson M. M. (2009). Discussing plagiarism in Latin America. EMBO Reports 4: 677–682.
- Wager, E. (2009). Recognition, reward and responsibility: Why the authorship of scientific papers matters. Maturitas 62: 109–112.
- Waltman, L. (2012). An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics 6(4): 700–711.
- Who is Accountable? (2007). Nature 450:1. doi:10.1038/450001a.
- Wislar, J. S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., and DeAngelis, C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. BMJ 343: d6128.