Advanced search
Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 22, 2015 - Issue 6: Ethics and Responsible Conduct of Research within the Chemical Community. Ideas and Experiences Worth Sharing
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,761
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Preface

Ethics and Responsible Conduct of Research within the Chemical Community. Ideas and Experiences Worth Sharing

Jeffrey I. Seeman Guest EditorDepartment of Chemistry, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, USACorrespondence[email protected]
, Ph.D.
Pages 303-306 | Published online: 09 Jul 2015

REFERENCES

  • Beach, D. 1996. The responsible conduct of research. Weinheim, Germany: VCH.
  • Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine, 2002. Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Federal Register. 2009. National Science Foundation, Responsible Conduct of Research. Volume 74 (August 20), Number 160, pp 42126-42128, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-08-20/html/E9-19930.htm, ( accessed June 5, 2015).
  • House, M. C., and J. I. Seeman. 2010. Credit and authorship practices. Educational and environmental influences. Account Research 17: 223–256.
  • Kovac, J. D. 2004. The ethical chemist: Professionalism and ethics in science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Lock, S., and F. Wells, 1996. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. Plymouth, England: Latimer Trend.
  • Macrina, F. L. 2014. Scientific integrity. 4th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2011. Responsible conduct of research. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html ( accessed November 30, 2014).
  • Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. 1992. Responsible Science, Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Vol. I. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. 1993. Responsible Science, Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Vol. II. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Resnik, D. B. 1998. The ethics of science. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Seebauer, E. G., and R. L. Barry, ed. 2001. Fundamentals of ethics for scientists and engineers. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Seeman, J. I. 2007. The Woodward-Doering/Rabe-Kindler total synthesis of quinine. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 46: 1378–1413.
  • Seeman, J. I., and M. C. House. 2010a. Influences on authorship issues. An evaluation of giving credit. Accountability in Research 17: 146–169.
  • Seeman, J. I., and M. C. House. 2010b. Influences on authorship issues. An evaluation of receiving, not receiving, and rejecting credit. Accountability in Research 17: 176–197.
  • Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible conduct of research. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Steneck, N. H. 2007. Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.