Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist?

References

• Anderson, M. S., B. C. Martinson, and R. De Vries. 2007. Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of U.S. scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2 (4):3–14. doi:10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. C. Martinson. 2007. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):437–61. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basalla, G. 1976. Pop science: The depiction of science in popular culture. In Science and its public, eds. G. Holton, and W. Blanpied. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Beardslee, D. C., and D. D. O’dowd. 1961. The college-student image of the scientist. Science 133 (3457):997–1001. doi:10.1126/science.133.3457.997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt, B., K. Charlton, N. Dorr, and D. L. Hume. 2001. Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin 127 (4):520–42. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., and A. Smith. 1989. Perceptions of and by minority groups: The case of women in academia. European Journal of Social Psychology 19 (1):61–75. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., and W. M. Williams. 2011. Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (8):3157–62. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. D. 2015. Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known. Addiction 110 (1):10–11. doi:10.1111/add.12728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. D., and M. R. Munafo. 2013. Trust in science would be improved by study pre-registration. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2013/jun/05/trust-in-science-study-pre-registration.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw-a-Scientist Test. Science Education 67 (2):255–65. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Google Scholar
• Character traits: Scientific virtue. 2016. Character traits: Scientific virtue. Nature 532 (7597):139. doi:10.1038/nj7597-139a.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. M., and J. Hart. 2009. Playing soccer on the football field: The persistence of gender inequities for women faculty. Equity & Excellence in Education 42 (4):473–88. doi:10.1080/10665680903284523.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. D. 1956/2014. The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]. 1969. Acta Psychologica 148:188–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One 4:e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F. C., J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall. 2013. Males are overrepresented among life science researchers committing scientific misconduct. MBio 4 (1):e00640–00612. doi:10.1128/mBio.00640-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. 1998. Psychology of science as a new subdiscipline in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20 (5):330–34. doi:10.1177/0963721411418471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fort, D. C., and H. L. Varney. 1989. How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children 26 (8):8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. 2012. Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review 77 (2):167–87. doi:10.1177/0003122412438225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassard, J. 1990. Science experiences: Cooperative learning and the teaching of science. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. Plos Medicine 2 (8):e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2012. Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (6):645–54. doi:10.1177/1745691612464056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2014. How to make more published research true. Plos Medicine 11 (10):e1001747. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipsos MORI. 2014. Public attitudes to science 2014. London. https://www.ipsos-mori.com/Assets/Docs/Polls/pas-2014-main-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R., and S. Perlmutter. 2015. Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth. Nature 526 (7572):187–89. doi:10.1038/526187a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. J. 1976. Scientist as subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge, MA, US: Ballinger Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. J. 1979. Psychology of the scientist - evaluative review. Social Studies of Science 9 (3):349–75. doi:10.1177/030631277900900304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. J., and B. G. DeMonbreun. 1977. Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of probem-solving bias. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1:229–38. doi:10.1007/BF01186796.
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, A. L. Crain, and R. De Vries. 2006. Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 (1):51–66. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. De Vries. 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435 (7043):737–38. doi:10.1038/435737a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKiernan, E. C., P. E. Bourne, C. T. Brown, S. Buck, A. Kenall, J. Lin, … C. K. Soderberg. 2016. How open science helps researchers succeed. Elife 5:e16800. doi:10.7554/eLife.16800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, M., and R. Metraux. 1957. Image of the scientist among high-school students a pilot study. Science. 126 (3270):384–90. doi: 10.1126/science.126.3270.384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1942. A note on science and democracy. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1:115.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. I., A. H. Eagly, and M. C. Linn. 2014. Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology 107 (3):631–44. doi:10.1037/edu0000005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitroff, I. I. 1974. The subjective side of science. A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, D. P., and L. D. Newton. 1992. Young children’s perceptions of science and the scientist. International Journal of Science Education 14 (3):331–48. doi:10.1080/0950069920140309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobelprize.org. 2014. Nobel prizes and laureates. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all/.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., G. Alter, G. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. Bowman, S. Breckler, … G. Christensen. 2015. Promoting an open research culture: Author guidelines for journals could help to promote transparency, openness, and reproducibility. Science (New York, NY) 348 (6242):1422. doi:10.1126/science.aab2374.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., and Y. Bar-Anan. 2012. Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication. Psychological Inquiry 23 (3):217–43. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., and D. Lakens. 2015. Registered reports. Social Psychology 45:137–41. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., J. Spies, and M. Motyl. 2012. Scientific Utopia: II - Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7:615–31. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuzzo, R. 2015. How scientists fool themselves-and how they can stop. Nature 526 (7572):182–85. doi:10.1038/526182a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ó Maoldomhnaigh, M., and Á. Hunt. 1988. Some factors affecting the image of the scientist drawn by older primary school pupils. Research in Science & Technological Education 6 (2):159–66. doi:10.1080/0263514880060206.
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration. 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349 (6251):aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics. 2014. Provo, Utah, USA: Qualtrics.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. 1966. Experimenter effects in behavioral research. East-Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible conduct of research, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H. 2013. Mind the gender gap. Nature 495 (7439):22–24. doi:10.1038/495022a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22:1359–66. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T., and J. Son. 2013. General Social Survey 2012 final report: Trends in public attitudes about confidence in institutions. Chicago, IL: NORC at the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. 2013. Global research integrity training. Science 340 (6132):552–53. doi:10.1126/science.1236373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugimoto, C. R. 2013. Global gender disparities in science. Nature 504 (7479):211–13. doi:10.1038/504211a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. 1981. Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1986. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Psychology of intergroup relations, eds. S. Worchel, and W. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson Reuters. 2014. Web of ScienceTM. https://webofknowledge.com.
   Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J. K., R. Verbeke, and Y. M. Smulders. 2014. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (5):64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J. K., A. C. Vergouwen, and Y. M. Smulders. 2013. Publication pressure and burn out among Dutch medical professors: A nationwide survey. Plos One 8 (9):e73381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, and M. S. Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Veldkamp, C. L. S., M. B. Nuijten, L. Dominguez-Alvarez, M. A. L. M. Van Assen, and J. M. Wicherts. 2014. Statistical reporting errors and collaboration on statistical analyses in psychological science. Plos One 9 (12):e114876. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114876.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., R. Wetzels, D. Borsboom, H. L. J. Van Der Maas, and R. A. Kievit. 2012. An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7:632–38. doi:10.1177/1745691612463078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D. L. 1938. Scientists Are human. London: Watts.
   Google Scholar
• West, J. D., J. Jacquet, M. M. King, S. J. Correll, and C. T. Bergstrom. 2013. The role of gender in scholarly authorship. Plos One 8 (7):e66212. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M. 2011. Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case. Nature 480:7. doi:10.1038/480007a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., C. L. S. Veldkamp, H. E. M. Augusteijn, M. Bakker, R. C. M. van Aert, and M. A. L. M. Van Assen 2016. Degrees of freedom in planning, running, analyzing, and reporting psychological studies: A checklist to avoid p-hacking. Frontiers in Psychology 7:1832. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, W. M., and S. J. Ceci. 2015. National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (17):5360–65. doi:10.1073/pnas.1418878112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, C. 2012. A sharp rise in retractions prompts calls for reform. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/17/science/rise-in-scientific-journal-retractions-prompts-calls-for-reform.html (accessed December 22, 2015).
   Google Scholar