Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 24, 2017 - Issue 5
589
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content

, M.S., , Ph.D., , M.S., , B.S., , B.S., , Ph.D. & , Ph.D. show all

References

  • Al-Jalahma, M., and E. Fakhroo. 2004. Teaching medical ethics: Implementation and evaluation of a new course during residency training in bahrain. Education for Health 18:62–72. doi:10.1080/13576280310001656187.
  • Angelos, P., D. A. DaRosa, A. M. Derossis, and B. Kim. 1999. Medical ethics curriculum for surgical residents: Results of a pilot project. Surgery 126:701–07. doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(99)70125-X.
  • Antes, A. L. 2014. A systematic approach to instruction in research ethics. Accountability in Research 21:50–67. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822269.
  • Antes, A. L., S. T. Murphy, E. P. Waples, M. D. Mumford, R. P. Brown, S. Connelly, and L. D. Devenport. 2009. A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior 19:379–402. doi:10.1080/10508420903035380.
  • Bagdasarov, Z., C. E. Thiel, J. F. Johnson, S. Connelly, L. N. Harkrider, L. D. Devenport, and M. D. Mumford. 2013. Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics 19:1305–22. doi:10.1007/s11948-012-9414-3.
  • Borenstein, J., M. J. Drake, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann. 2010. The engineering and science issues test (ESIT): A discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment. Science and Engineering Ethics 16:387–407. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9148-z.
  • Brock, M. E., A. Vert, V. Kligyte, E. P. Waples, S. T. Sevier, and M. D. Mumford. 2008. Mental models: An alternative evaluation of a sensemaking approach to ethics instruction. Science and Engineering Ethics 14:449–72. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9076-3.
  • Brown, S., and M. W. Kalichman. 1998. Effects of training in responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 4:487–98. doi:10.1007/s11948-998-0041-y.
  • Bulger, R. E., and E. Heitman. 2007. Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university. Academic Medicine 82:876–78. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909.
  • Cho, K. C., and G. Shin. 2014. Operational effectiveness of blended e-learning program for nursing research ethics. Nursing Ethics 21:484–95. doi:10.1177/0969733013505310.
  • Clarkeburn, H., J. R. Downie, and B. Matthew. 2002. Impact of an ethics programme in a life sciences curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education 7:65–79. doi:10.1080/13562510120100391.
  • Clarkeburn, H. M., J. R. Downie, C. Gray, and R. G. Matthew. 2003. Measuring ethical development in life sciences students: A study using Perry’s developmental model. Studies in Higher Education 28:443–56. doi:10.1080/0307507032000122288.
  • Cohen, J. 1992. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112:155. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
  • Craft, J. L. 2013. A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 2004–2011. Journal of Business Ethics 117:221–59. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9.
  • Drake, M. J., P. M. Griffin, R. Kirkman, and J. L. Swann. 2005. Engineering ethical curricula: Assessment and comparison of two approaches. Journal of Engineering Education 94:223–31. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00843.x
  • Drazin, R., M. A. Glynn, and R. K. Kazanjian. 1999. Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. Academy of Management Review 24:286–307.
  • DuBois, J. M., and J. M. Dueker. 2009. Teaching and assessing the responsible conduct of research: A Delphi consensus panel report. The Journal of Research Administration 40:49–70.
  • DuBois, J. M., M. J. M. Dueker, E. E. Anderson, and J. Campbell. 2008. The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program. Academic Medicine 83:596–603. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181723095.
  • DuBois, J. M., D. A. Schilling, E. Heitman, N. H. Steneck, and A. A. Kon. 2010. Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: An inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs. Clinical and Translational Science 3:109–11. doi:10.1111/cts.2010.3.issue-3.
  • Eisen, A., and R. M. Berry. 2002. The absent professor: Why we don’t teach research ethics and what to do about it. The American Journal of Bioethics 2:38–49. doi:10.1162/152651602320957556.
  • Evans, B. C., and R. Bendel. 2004. Cognitive and ethical maturity in baccalaureate nursing students: Did a class using narrative pedagogy make a difference? Nursing Education Perspectives 25:188–95.
  • Fanelli, D. 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. Plos One 4:e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
  • Goldstein, I. L., and J. K. Ford. 2002. Training in organizations: needs assessment, development, and evaluation, 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Grinnell, F. 1999. Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research. Science Andengineering Ethics 5:205–14. doi:10.1007/s11948-999-0011-z.
  • Harris, C. E., M. Davis, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins. 2005. Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
  • Heitman, E., and R. E. Bulger. 2005. Assessing the educational literature in the responsible conduct of research for core content. Accountability in Research 12:207–24. doi:10.1080/08989620500217420.
  • Helton-Fauth, W., B. Gaddis, G. Scott, M. Mumford, L. Devenport, S. Connelly, and R. Brown. 2003. A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work. Accountability in Research 10:205–28. doi:10.1080/714906104.
  • Jick, T. D. 1979. Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly 24:602–11. doi:10.2307/2392366.
  • John, L. K., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science 23:524–32. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953.
  • Jurkiewicz, C. L. 2002. The influence of pedagogical style on students’ level of ethical reasoning. Journal of Public Affairs Education 8:263–74.
  • Kalichman, M. 2014. Rescuing responsible conduct of research (RCR) education. Accountability in Research 21:68–83. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822271.
  • Kalichman, M. W., and D. K. Plemmons. 2007. Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine 82:846–52. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
  • Kavathatzopoulos, I. 1994. Training professional managers in decision-making about real life business ethics problems: The acquisition of the autonomous problem-solving skill. Journal of Business Ethics 13:379–86. doi:10.1007/BF00871765.
  • Kohlberg, L. 1984. Essays on moral development: Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.
  • Kon, A. A., D. A. Schilling, E. Heitman, N. H. Steneck, and J. M. DuBois. 2011. Content analysis of major textbooks and online resources used in responsible conduct of research instruction. AJOB Primary Research 2:42–46. doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.564263.
  • Loui, M. C. 2009. Ethics assessment: Information trust institute summer undergraduate internship program. Unpublished manuscript.
  • MacDougall, A. E., L. N. Harkrider, Z. Bagdasarov, J. F. Johnson, C. E. Thiel, J. Peacock, M. D. Mumford, L. D. Devenport, and S. Connelly. 2014. Examining the effects of incremental case presentation and forecasting outcomes on case-based ethics instruction. Ethics & Behavior 24:126–50. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.824819.
  • Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. De Vries. 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435:737–38. doi:10.1038/435737a.
  • Marušić, A., L. Bošnjak, and A. Jerončić. 2011. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. Plos One 6:e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
  • Mastroianni, A. C., and J. P. Kahn. 1998. The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 73:1249–54. doi:10.1097/00001888-199812000-00013.
  • McCormack, W. T., W. L. Allen, S. Connelly, L. M. Coolen, J. Crites, J. Engler, C. W. Garvan, P. Haidet, J. Hockensmith, W. McElroy, R. Volpe, and M. F. Verderame. 2015. Team-based learning for RCR training supports ethical decision-making. Unpublished conference poster.
  • Mitcham, C. 2003. Co-responsibility for research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 9:273–90. doi:10.1007/s11948-003-0014-0.
  • Mulhearn, T. J., L. M., Steele, L. L. Watts, K. E. Medeiros, M. D. Mumford, and S. Connelly. 2016a. Review of instructional approaches in ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9803-0.
  • Mulhearn, T. J., L. L. Watts, B. S. Torrence, E. M. Todd, M. R. Turner, S. Connelly, and M. D. Mumford. 2016b. Cross-field comparison of ethics education: Golden rules and particulars. Accountability in Research (just-accepted). doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1274974
  • Mumford. 2015. Professional ethics training: Mean comparisons of ethics training effectiveness in 2014-2015. Retrieved from. The University of Oklahoma.
  • Mumford, M. D., S. Connelly, R. P. Brown, S. T. Murphy, J. H. Hill, A. L. Antes, E. P. Waples, and L. D. Devenport. 2008. A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior 18:315–39. doi:10.1080/10508420802487815.
  • Mumford, M. D., S. Connelly, S. T. Murphy, L. D. Devenport, A. L. Antes, R. P. Brown, J. H. Hill, and E. P. Waples. 2009. Field and experience influences on ethical decision-making in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior 19:263–89. doi:10.1080/10508420903035257.
  • National Society of Professional Engineers. 2007. Code of Ethics for Engineers. https://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/Code-2007-July.pdf
  • Perry, W. G. 1999. Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pimple, K. D. 2002. Six domains of research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 8:191–205. doi:10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1.
  • Ramalingam, S., S. Bhuvaneswari, and R. SanKaRan. 2014. Ethics workshops-are they effective in improving the competencies of faculty and postgraduates? Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 8: XC01-XC03.
  • Resnik, D. B. 2003. From Baltimore to bell labs: Reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research 10:123–35. doi:10.1080/08989620300508.
  • Rest, J. R. 1986. An overview of the psychology of morality. In Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues, ed. J. R. Rest, 133–75. New York, NY: Praeger.
  • Roberts, L. W., T. D. Warner, K. A. G. Hammond, J. L. Brody, A. Kaminsky, and B. B. Roberts. 2005. Teaching medical students to discern ethical problems in human clinical research studies. Academic Medicine 80:925–30.
  • Rozmus, C. L., N. Carlin, A. Polczynski, J. Spike, and R. Buday. 2014. The Brewsters: A new resource for interprofessional ethics education. Nursing Ethics 22:815–26. doi:10.1177/0969733014547974
  • Salas, E., S. I. Tannenbaum, K. Kraiger, and K. A. Smith-Jentsch. 2012. The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 13:74–101. doi:10.1177/1529100612436661.
  • Steneck, N. H. 1999. Confronting misconduct in science in the 1980s and 1990s: What has and has not been accomplished? Science and Engineering Ethics 5:161–76. doi:10.1007/s11948-999-0005-x.
  • Steneck, N. H. 2000. Assessing the integrity of publicly funded research. Proceedings from the ORI Conference on Research on Research Integrity. Washington, DC: ORI, pp. 1–16.
  • Steneck, N. H. 2006. Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics 12:53–74. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y.
  • Steneck, N. H. 2007. ORI: Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Steneck, N. H., and R. E. Bulger. 2007. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 82:829–34. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
  • Stroebe, W., T. Postmes, and R. Spears. 2012. Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7:670–88. doi:10.1177/1745691612460687.
  • Thirunavukarasu, P., L. P. Brewster, S. M. Pecora, and D. E. Hall. 2010. Educational intervention is effective in improving knowledge and confidence in surgical ethics—A prospective study. The American Journal of Surgery 200:665–69. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.002.
  • Titus, S. L., J. A. Wells, and L. J. Rhoades. 2008. Repairing research integrity. Nature 453:980–82. doi:10.1038/453980a.
  • Watts, L. L., K. E. Medeiros, T. J. Mulhearn, L. M. Steele, S. Connelly, and M. D. Mumford. 2016. Are ethics training programs improving? A meta-analytic comparison of past and present ethics instruction in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior (just-accepted). doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1182025.
  • Workman, M., and J. Gathegi. 2007. Punishment and ethics deterrents: A study of insider security contravention. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58:212–22. doi:10.1002/asi.20474

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.