Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/Interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications

References

• Ahmed, S. M., C. A. Maurana, J. A. Engle, D. E. Uddin, and K. D. Glaus. 1997. A Method for Assigning Authorship in Multiauthored Publications. Family Medicine 29 (1):42–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Akhabue, E., and E. Lautenbach. 2010. ‘Equal’ Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship. Annals of Epidemiology 20 (11):868–71. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L., A. Brand, J. Scott, M. Altman, and M. Hlava. 2014. Credit Where Credit Is Due. Nature 508:312–13. doi:10.1038/508312a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Research Council. 2014. State of Australian University Research. Text Volume 1. http://www.arc.gov.au/era-reports#ERA2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, T., A. Anić, M. Marušić, and A. Marušić. 2004. Authorship Criteria and Disclosure of Contributions. JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association 292 (1):86–88. doi:10.1001/jama.292.1.86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belwalkar, B., and S. Toaddy. 2014. Authorship Determination Scorecard. http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-determination-scorecard.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, D. M., and D. M. D. Taylor. 2003. Unethical Practices in Authorship of Scientific Papers. Emergency Medicine 15:263–70. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhandari, M., G. H. Guyatt, A. V. Kulkarni, P. J. Devereaux, P. Leece, S. Bajammal, D. Heels-Ansdell, and J. W. Busse. 2014. Perceptions of Authors’ Contributions Are Influenced by Both Byline Order and Designation of Corresponding Author. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67 (9):1049–54. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhopal, R. S., J. M. Rankin, E. McColl, R. Stacy, P. H. Pearson, E. F. Kaner, L. H. Thomas, B. G. Vernon, and H. Rodgers. 1997. Authorship. Team Approach to Assigning Authorship Order Is Recommended. BMJ: British Medical Journal 314 (7086):1046.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. C., C. R. Chen, and L. T. W. Cheng. 2009. Co-Authorship Patterns in Accounting Research. International Review of Accounting, Banking and Finance 1 (2):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, D. S. 2014. Could Digital Badges Clarify the Roles of Co-Authors? http://news.sciencemag.org/scientific-community/2014/11/could-digital-badges-clarify-roles-co-authors ( accessed December 12, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, D. S. 2015. Digital Badges Aim to Clear up Politics of Authorship. Nature 526 (7571):145–46. doi:10.1038/526145a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COPE. 2011. Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors; Version 4. http://publicationethics.org/guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Dance, A. 2012. Authorship: Who’s on First? Nature 489 (7417):591–93. doi:10.1038/nj7417-591a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, R., M. S. Anderson, and B. C. Martinson. 2006. Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal 1:43–50. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrochers, N., T. D. Bowman, S. Haustein, P. Mongeon, A. Quan-Haase, A. Paul-Hus, R. Costas, V. Larivière, J. Pecoskie, and A. Tsou. 2015. Authorship, Patents, Citations, Acknowledgments, Tweets, Reader Counts and the Multifaceted Reward System of Science. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 52 (1):1–4. doi:10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010013.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, E. B., J. Beney, and L. A. Bero. 2005. Equity, Accountability, Transparency: Implementation of the Contributorship Concept in a Multi-Site Study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 69 (4):455–59. doi:10.5688/aj690461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, B. 2013. Equal Contributions and Credit Assigned to Authors in Pharmacy Journals. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 77:2. doi:10.5688/ajpe77239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois, J. M., D. A. Schilling, E. Heitman, N. H. Steneck, and A. A. Kon. 2010. Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research: An Inventory of Programs and Materials within CTSAs. Clinical and Translational Science 3 (3):109–11. doi:10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00193.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, M. J. 2012. Misused Honorary Authorship Is No Excuse for Quantifying the Unquantifiable. Journal of Medical Ethics medethics – 2012–100939, September. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endersby, J. W. 1996. Collaborative Research in the Social Sciences: Multiple Authorship and Publication Credit. Social Science Quarterly 77 (2):375–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A., L. A. Carey, P. B. Fontanarosa, et al. 1998. Prevalence of Articles with Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals. JAMA 280 (3):222–24. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, T. F., and J. Nicolaisen. 2010. What Is in a Name? Credit Assignment Practices in Different Disciplines. Journal of Informetrics 4:608–17. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frische, S. 2012. It Is Time for Full Disclosure of Author Contributions. Nature 489 (7417):475–475. doi:10.1038/489475a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeta, T. J. 1999. Authorship: “Law” and Order. Academic Emergency Medicine 6 (4):297–301. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00393.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingras, Y. 2014. Les dérives de l’évaluation de la recherche: Du bon usage de la bibliométrie. Paris, France: Raisons d’agir éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., and D. F. Thompson. 2014. The spirit of compromise: Why governing demands it and campaigning undermines it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holleman, W., and E. R. Gritz. 2013. Biomedical Burnout. Nature 500 (7464):613–14. doi:10.1038/nj7464-613a.
   Google Scholar
• Holleman, W. L., L. M. Cofta-Woerpel, and E. R. Gritz. 2015. Stress and Morale of Academic Biomedical Scientists. Academic Medicine 90 (5):562–64. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley, V., E. Teijlingen, and P. Simkhada. 2013. Academic Authorship: Who, Why and in What Order? Health Renaissance 11 (2):99–101. doi:10.3126/hren.v11i2.8214.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, R. 1991. Trying an Authorship Index. Nature 352 (6332):187–187. doi:10.1038/352187a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S., H. H. Song, J. H. Baik, S. L. Jung, S. H. Park, K. H. Choi, and Y. H. Park. 2003. Researcher Contributions and Fulfillment of ICMJE Authorship Criteria: Analysis of Author Contribution Lists in Research Articles with Multiple Authors Published in Radiology1. Radiology 226 (1):16–23. doi:10.1148/radiol.2261011255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICMJE. 2015. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. http://icmje.acponline.org/news-and-editorials/icmje-recommendations_annotated_dec14.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M. W. 2011. Overview: Underserved Areas of Education in the Responsible Conduct of Research: Authorship. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2):335–39. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9281-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M. W. 2014. Rescuing Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education. Accountability in Research 21 (1):68–83. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M. W., and D. K. Plemmons. 2007. Reported Goals for Responsible Conduct of Research Courses. Academic Medicine 82 (9):846–52. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f78bf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D. S., and A. Smith. 2014. Implementing Transitive Credit with JSON-LD. \Iarxiv Preprint Arxiv 1407:5117. http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.5117.
   Google Scholar
• Kosslyn, S. 2002. Criteria for Authorship Order. http://kosslynlab.fas.harvard.edu/files/kosslynlab/files/authorship_criteria_nov02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, J. 2013. Honorary Authorship Epidemic in Scholarly Publications? How the Current Use of Citation-Based Evaluative Metrics Make (pseudo)honorary Authors from Honest Contributors of Every Multi-Author Article. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):509–12. doi:10.1136/medethics-2012-100568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, L. S. 2005. The White Bull Effect: Abusive Coauthorship and Publication Parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):554–56. doi:10.1136/jme.2004.010553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacasse, J. R., and J. Leo. 2010. Ghostwriting at Elite Academic Medical Centers in the United States. Plos Medicine 7 (2):e1000230. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laflin, M. T., E. D. Glover, and R. J. McDermott. 2005. Publication Ethics: An Examination of Authorship Practices. American Journal of Health Behavior 29:579–87. doi:10.5993/AJHB.29.6.12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFollette, M. C. 1992. Stealing into print: Fraud, plagiarism, and misconduct in scientific publishing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., N. Desrochers, B. Macaluso, P. Mongeon, A. Paul-Hus, and C. Sugimoto. 2016. Contributorship and Division of Labor in Knowledge Production. Accepted for Publicaiton in Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/0306312716650046.
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., J. M. Holdsworth, M. S. Anderson, and E. G. Campbell. 2008. Everyday Ethics in Research: Translating Authorship Guidelines into Practice in the Bench Sciences. The Journal of Higher Education 79:88–112. doi:10.1353/jhe.2008.0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. De Vries. 2005. Scientists Behaving Badly. Nature 435:737–38. doi:10.1038/435737a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušić, A., L. Bošnjak, and A. Jerončić. 2011. A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines. Plos ONE 6 (9):e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušič, A., D. Hren, B. Mansi, N. Lineberry, A. Bhattacharya, M. Garrity, J. Clark, et al. 2014. Five-Step Authorship Framework to Improve Transparency in Disclosing Contributors to Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trial Publications. BMC Medicine 12 (1):197. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0197-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master, Z. 2011. The responsible conduct of bioethics research. Accountability in Research 18:102–19. doi:10.1080/08989621.2011.557302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master, Z., and G. K. D. Crozier. 2012. The ethics of moral compromise for stem cell research policy. Health Care Analysis 20 (1):50–65. doi:10.1007/s10728-011-0171-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Master, Z., M. McDonald, D. Paciulli, and H. Longstaff. 2016. A Primer on Ethics Education for Stem Cell and Biomedical Scientists. Current Stem Cell Reports 2:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Mastroianni, A. C., and J. P. Kahn. 1999. Encouraging accountability in research: A Pilot assessment of training efforts. Accountability in Research 7 (1):85–100. doi:10.1080/08989629908573943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moher, D., and D. G. Altman. 2015. Four proposals to help improve the medical research literature. Plos Medicine 12 (9):e1001864. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001864.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies (U.S.), Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.), National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine (U.S.), eds. 2005. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2009. Update on the Requirement for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research. NOT-OD-10-019. http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html ( accessed November 24).
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF). 2009. Responsible Conduct of Research, vol. 74, no. 160. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-08-20/html/E9-19930.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nylenna, M., F. Fagerbakk, and P. Kierulf. 2014. Authorship: Attitudes and Practice among Norwegian Researchers. BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):53. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Research Integrity. 2000. Public Health Service Policy on Instruction in the responsible conduct of research. http://oprs.usc.edu/files/2013/01/PHS_Policy_on_RCR1.pdf ( accessed October 31, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Okonta, P., and T. Rossouw. 2013. Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics 13 (3):149–57. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W., and A. Holland. 2009. What Is Authorship, and What Should It Be? A Survey of Prominent Guidelines for Determining Authorship in Scientific Publications. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 14 (15):2.
   Google Scholar
• Paneth, N. 1998. Separating authorship responsibility and authorship credit: A proposal for biomedical journals. American Journal of Public Health 88 (5):824–26. doi:10.2105/AJPH.88.5.824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontille, D. 2004. La Signature Scientifique : Une Sociologie Pragmatique de L’attribution. CNRS Sociologie (Paris). http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16213499.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. L., D. J. Roessner, and A. E. Heberger. 2008. How Interdisciplinary Is a given Body of Research? Research Evaluation 17 (4):273–82. doi:10.3152/095820208X364553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhakar, C. T. 2014. Authorship Matrix: A rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, D. 2001. Who Did What? Authorship and Contribution in 2001. Muscle & Nerve 24 (10):1274–77. doi:10.1002/mus.1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, D., V. Yank, and L. Emanuel. 1997. When authorship fails. A Proposal to make contributors accountable. The Journal of the American Medical Association 278 (7):579–85. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550070071041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. 1997. A proposal for a new system of credit allocation in science. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (3):237–43. doi:10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. 1998. The ethics of science: An introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D., and Z. Master. 2011. Criteria for authorship in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 11:17–21. doi:10.1080/15265161.2011.603795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D., and Z. Master. 2013. Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries. Plos Medicine 10 (3):e1001406. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler, J. C., and B. L. Russell. 2005. Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics and Behavior 15 (1):65–80. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheetz, M. D. 1999. Office of research integrity: A reflection of disputes and misunderstandings. Croatian Medical Journal 40:321–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. H. 1987. A worksheet for authorship of scientific articles. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 68 (1):8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sheskin, T. J. 2006. An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics 12:555–65. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0053-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. Forthcoming. A theoretical foundation for the ethical distribution of authorship in multidisciplinary publications. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and R. Boulanger. 2011. What about author order and acknowledgments? suggestions for additional criteria for conceptual research in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 11:24–26. doi:10.1080/15265161.2011.603813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and B. Williams-Jones. 2011. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2):1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1997. Authorship Is Dying: Long Live Contributorship. Bmj 315 (7110):696. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7110.696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H., and R. E. Bulger. 2007. The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 82 (9):829–34. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7d4d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulmasy, D. P., and J. Sugarman. 2010. The Many Methods of Medical Ethics (Or, Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Black Bird). In Methods in medical ethics, 2nd ed., 3–20. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira Da Silva, J. A., and J. Dobránszki. 2015. Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, October. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J. K., R. Verbeke, and Y. M. Smulders. 2014. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (5):64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J. K., A. C. M. Vergouwen, and Y. M. Smulders. 2013. Publication pressure and burn out among dutch medical professors: A nationwide survey. Plos One 8 (9):e73381. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tri-Agency. 2011. Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible conduct of research. http://www.rcr.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/framework-cadre/ ( accessed October 31, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Tscharntke, T., M. E. Hochberg, T. A. Rand, V. H. Resh, and J. Krauss. 2007. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. Plos Biology 5 (1):e18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Praag, C. M., and B. M. S. Van Praag. 2008. The benefits of being economics professor A (Rather than Z). Economica 75:782–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00653.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L. 2012. An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics 6 (4):700–11. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WAME. 2007. Policy Statements—World Association of Medical Editors. http://www.wame.org/policy-statements ( accessed October 31, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., L. Tang, L. Bo, J. Li, and X. Deng. 2012. Equal contributions and credit given to authors in critical care medicine journals during a 10-Yr Period*:. Critical Care Medicine 40 (3):967–69. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f66a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrender, J. M. 2016. A simple framework for evaluating authorial contributions for scientific publications. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5):1419–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, L. J. 1998. Authorship: The coin of the realm, the source of complaints. JAMA 280 (3):216–17. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, R. B. 1985. A suggested procedure for determining order of authorship in research publications. Journal of Counseling and Development 63 (8):515–18. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb02749.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316 (5827):1036–39. doi:10.1126/science.1136099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar