The Inappropriate Use of Risk-Benefit Analysis in the Risk Assessment of Experimental Trauma-Focused Research

References

• Appelbaum, P. S., L. H. Roth, and C. Lidz. 1982. The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5:319–29. doi:10.1016/0160-2527(82)90026-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8:19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
   Google Scholar
• Becker-Blease, K. A., and J. J. Freyd. 2006. Research participants telling the truth about their lives. American Psychologist 61(3):218–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, J., B. Runeson, and U. Asgard. 1991. Ethical aspects of psychological autopsy. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 84:482–87. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03181.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boscarino, J., C. Figley, R. Adams, S. Galea, H. Resnick, A. Fleischman, M. Bucuvalus, and M. Gold. 2004. Adverse reactions associated with studying persons recently exposed to mass urban disaster. Journal of Mental and Nervous Diseases 192:515–24. doi:10.1097/01.nmd.0000135476.20580.ae.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabin, P., and E. Berah. 1995. Dredging up past traumas: Harmful or helpful? Psychiatry, Psychology & Law 2:165–71. doi:10.1080/13218719509524863.
   Google Scholar
• Bracken-Roche, D., E. Bell, M. E. Macdonald, and E. Racine. 2017. The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Research Policy and Systems 15:8. doi:10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckle, J., S. Corbin Dwyer, and M. Jackson. 2010. Qualitative bereavement research: Incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 13:111–25. doi:10.1080/13645570902767918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, E. B., E. Newman, J. W. Daniels, J. Armstrong, D. Roth, and R. Loewenstein. 2003. Distress in response to and perceived usefulness of trauma research interviews. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 4:131–42. doi:10.1300/J229v04n02_08.
   Google Scholar
• Carter-Visscher, R. M., A. E. Naugle, K. M. Bell, and M. K. Suvak. 2007. Ethics of asking trauma-related questions and exposing participants to arousal-inducing stimuli. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 8:27–55. doi:10.1300/J229v08n03_03.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark, C. J., M. Shahrouri, L. Halasa, I. Khalaf, R. Spencer, and S. Everson-Rose. 2012. A mixed methods study of participant reaction to domestic violence research in Jordan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27:1655–76. doi:10.1177/0886260511430383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collogan, L., F. Tuma, R. Dolan-Sewell, S. Borja, and A. Fleischman. 2004. Ethical issues pertaining to research in the aftermath of disaster. Journal of Traumatic Stress 17:363–72. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048949.43570.6a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S., D. Darnell, E. Anthony, C. P. Tusher, L. Zimmerman, D. Enkhtor, and T. Hipp. 2011. Investigating the effects of trauma-related research on well-being. Accountability in Research 18:297–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromer, L., J. Freyd, A. Binder, A. DePrince, and K. Becker-Blease. 2006. What’s the risk in asking? Participant reaction to trauma history questions compared with reactions to other personal questions. Ethics and Behavior 16:347–62. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1604_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, S., R. Carter-Visscher, K. Bell, and A. Seifert. 2011. Ethical issues in research on sensitive topics: Participants’ experience of distress and benefit. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6:55–64. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePrince, A., and J. Freyd. 2006. Costs and benefits of being asked about trauma history. Journal of Trauma Practice 3:23–35. doi:10.1300/J189v03n04_02.
   Google Scholar
• Dyregrov, K., A. Dyregrov, and M. Raundalen. 2000. Refugee families experience of research participation. Journal of Traumatic Stress 13:413–26. doi:10.1023/A:1007777006605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K., M. Kearns, K. Calhoun, and C. Gidycz. 2009. College women’s reactions to sexual assault research participation: Is it distressing? Psychology of Women Quarterly 33:225–34. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01492.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. M., K. M. Sylaska, and C. A. Gidycz. 2014. Women’s reactions to participating in dating violence research: A mixed methodological study. Psychology of Violence 4:224. doi:10.1037/a0034339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethical consideration in the report of a work group on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and vulnerable populations in research. National Ethics Teleconference, February 25, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research 15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, S. J. 1995. Patients in research: Not just subjects but partners. Science 11:797–98. doi:10.1126/science.7638595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, S., D. Nazarian, J. Weitlauf, and S. Lindley. 2011. Overview of bioethical issues in contemporary PTSD treatment and research: Considering priorities for future empirical ethics investigation. AJOB Primary Research 2:26–32. doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.629640.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. E., and C. C. Benight. 2003. Effects of trauma-focused research on recent domestic violence survivors Journal of traumatic stress 16(6):567–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilpatrick, D. 2004. Ethics of disaster research: A special section. Journal of Traumatic Stress 17:362–362. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048961.75301.74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legerski, J. P., and S. L. Bunnell. 2010. The risks, benefits, and ethics of trauma-focused research participation. Ethics & Behaviour 20:429–42. doi:10.1080/10508422.2010.521443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, C. 2004. The concept of vulnerability in disaster research. Journal of Traumatic Stress 17:395–402. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048952.81894.f3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, R. J. 1988. Ethics and the regulation of clinical research, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. W., and P. S. Appelbaum. 2002. The therapeutic misconception: Problems and solutions. Medical Care 40:V55–63. doi:10.1097/00005650-200209001-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 1998. Research involving persons with mental disorders that may affect decision-making capacity. Vol 1: Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, National Bioethics Advisory Commission, Rockville, Md.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E., and D. Kaloupek. 2004. The risks and benefits of participating in trauma-focused studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress 17:383–94. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048951.02568.3a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E., and D. Kaloupek. 2009. Overview of research addressing ethical dimensions of participation in traumatic stress studies: Autonomy and beneficence. Journal of Traumatic Stress 22:595–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E., D. G. Kaloupek, T. M. Keane, and S. F. Folstein. 1997. Ethical issues in trauma research: The evolution of an empirical model for decision making. In Out of the Darkness: Contemporary Perspectives on Family Violence, ed. G. Kaufman Kantor & J. L. Jasinski, 271–281. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E., E. Risch, and K. Kassam-Adams. 2006. Ethical issues in trauma related research: A review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1:29–46. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.3.29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, E., E. A. Walker, and A. Gefland. 1999. Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry 21:187–96. doi:10.1016/S0163-8343(99)00011-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mathuna, D. P. 2010. Conducting research in the aftermath of disasters: Ethical considerations. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine 3:65–75. doi:10.1111/j.1756-5391.2010.01076.x.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, K., R. Gershon, E. Smailes, V. Raveis, B. Murphy, F. Matzner, and A. Fleishman. 2007. Roadmap for the protection of disaster research participants: Findings from the world trade center evacuation study. Prehospital Disaster Medicine 22:486–93. doi:10.1017/S1049023X00005306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosensein, D. L. 2004. Decision-making capacity and disaster research. Journal of Traumatic Stress 17:373–81. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048950.36359.a2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzek, J. I., and D. Zatzick. 2000. Ethical considerations in research participation amongst acutely injured trauma survivors: An empirical investigation. Law, Ethics and Psychiatry 22:27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Schwerdtfeger, K., and B. Nelson Goff. 2008. The effects of trauma-focused research participation on pregnant female participants. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 3:59–67. doi:10.1525/jer.2008.3.1.59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seedat, S., W. P. Pienaar, D. Williams, and D. Stein. 2004. Ethics of research on survivors of trauma. Current Psychiatry Reports 6:262–67. doi:10.1007/s11920-004-0075-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. 1978a. Institutional review boards: Report and recommendations. (DHEW Publication (OS), 78-0008), Department of Health, Education & Welfare Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. 1978b. The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects and research. DHEW Publication (OS) 78-0013, Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, E., E. Newman, M. Koss, and D. Berstein. 1997. Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims? General Hospital Psychiatry 19:203–410. doi:10.1016/S0163-8343(97)00061-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijer, C. 2000. The ethical analysis of risk. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 28:344–61. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00686.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijer, C., and P. B. Miller. 2004. When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? Nature Medicine 10:570–73. doi:10.1038/nm0604-570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willebrand, M. 2008. Presence of psychiatric morbidity and regrets about participation in trauma-related research- A pilot study. General Hospital Psychiatry 30:476–78. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeater, E., G. Miller, J. Rinehart, and E. Nason. 2012. Trauma and sex surveys meet minimal risk standards implications for institutional review boards. Psychological Science 23:780–87. doi:10.1177/0956797611435131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar