The poor availability of syntaxes of structural equation modeling

References

• Alsheikh-Ali, A. A., W. Qureshi, M. H. Al-Mallah, and J. P. A. Ioannidis. 2011. Public availability of published research data in high-impact journals. PLoS One 6:e24357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbuckle, J. L., and W. Wohtke. 1999. AMOS 4.0 User’s guide. Chicago, IL: Small Waters Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Boker, S., M. Neale, H. Maes, M. Wilde, M. Spiegel, T. Brick, J. Spies, R. Estabrook, S. Kenny, T. Bates, P. Mehta, and J. Fox. 2011. OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika 76:306–17. doi:10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, J. R., and S. C. Reese. 1973. Retention of raw data: A problem revisited. American Psychologist 28:723. doi:10.1037/h0035667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giofre, D., G. Cumming, L. Fresc, I. Boedker, and P. Tressoldi. 2017. The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices. PLoS One 12:e0175583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howison, J., and J. Bullard. 2016. Software in the scientific literature: Problems with seeing, finding, and using software mentioned in the biology literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67:2137–55. doi:10.1002/asi.23538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., and R. Koizumi. 2010. Can structural equation models in second language testing and learning research be successfully replicated? International Journal of Testing 10:262–73. doi:10.1080/15305058.2010.482219.
   Google Scholar
• In’nami, Y., and R. Koizumi. 2011. Structural equation modeling in language testing and learning research: A review. Language Assessment Quarterly 8:250–76. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.582203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. L., J. A. Gillaspy, and R. Purc-Stephenson. 2009. Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods 14:6–23. doi:10.1037/a0014694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., and D. Sörbom. 1996–2003. LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL, US: SSI Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. C., L. B. Lazarevic, E. Baranski, T. E. Hardwicke, S. Piechowski, L. S. Falkenberg, C. Kennett, A. Slowik, C. Sonnleitner, C. Hess-Holden, T. M. Errington, S. Fiedler, and B. A. Nosek. 2016. Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biol 14:e1002456. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, M., H. Van De Sompel, R. Sanderson, H. Shankar, L. Balakireva, K. Zhou, and R. Tobin. 2014. Scholarly context not found: One in five articles suffers from reference rot. PloS One 9:e115253. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczyk, M., and E. Reuben. 2012. (Un)Available upon request: Field experiment on researchers’ WILLINGNESS to share supplementary materials. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 19:175–86. doi:10.1080/08989621.2012.678688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., and J. T. Austin. 2000. Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology 51:201–26. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., and L. K. Muthén. 1998–2010. Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Los Angeles, CA, US: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., J. Spies, and M. Motyl. 2012. Scientific Utopia: II - restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7:615–31. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuijten, M. B., J. Borghuis, C. L. S. Veldkamp, L. D. Alvarez, M. A. L. M. Van Assen, and J. M. Wicherts. 2017. Journal data sharing policies and statistical reporting inconsistencies in psychology. osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/sgbta.
   Google Scholar
• Nuijten, M. B., C. H. J. Hartgerink, M. A. L. M. Van Assen, S. Epskamp, and J. M. Wicherts. 2016. The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods 48:1205–26. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunkoo, R., H. Ramkissoon, and D. Gursoy. 2013. Use of structural equation modeling in tourism research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Travel Research 52:759–71. doi:10.1177/0047287513478503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. 2012. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48:1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampath Kumar, B. T., and D. Vinay Kumar. 2013. HTTP 404-page (not) found: Recovery of decayed URL citations. Journal of Informetrics 7:145–57. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2012.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman, C. S., and R. Weber. 2015. Undisclosed flexibility in computing and reporting structural equation models in communication science. Communication Methods and Measures 9:208–32. doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1096329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, R., and S. M. Goldstein. 2006. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management 24:148–69. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies, J. 2013. The Open Science Framework: Improving Science by Making It Open and Accessible. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia. https://osf.io/t23za/.
   Google Scholar
• Spinellis, D. 2003. The decay and failures of web references. Communications of the ACM 46:71–77. doi:10.1145/602421.602422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stodden, V., P. Guo, and Z. Ma. 2013. Toward reproducible computational research: An empirical analysis of data and code policy adoption by journals. PLoS One 8:e67111. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0067111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stodden, V., M. McNutt, D. H. Bailey, E. Deelman, Y. Gil, B. Hanson, M. A. Heroux, J. P. A. Ioannidis, and M. Taufer. 2016. Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science 354:1240–41. doi:10.1126/science.aah6168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanpaemel, W., M. Vermorgen, L. Deriemaecker, and G. Storms. 2015. Are we wasting a good crisis? The availability of psychological research data after the storm. Collabra 1:1–5. doi:10.1525/collabra.13.
   Google Scholar
• Vines, T. H., A. Y. K. Albert, R. L. Andrew, F. Debarre, D. G. Bock, M. T. Franklin, K. Gilbert, J.-S. Moore, S. Renaut, and D. Rennison. 2014. The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Current Biology 24:94–97. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., M. Bakker, and D. Molenaar. 2011. Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical results. PLoS ONE 6:e26828. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., D. Borsboom, J. Kats, and D. Molenaar. 2006. The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist 61:726–28. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicherts, J. M., C. V. Dolan, and D. J. Hessen. 2005. Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: A question of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89:696–716. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolins, L. 1962. Responsibility for raw data. American Psychologist 17:657–58. doi:10.1037/h0038819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar