Person-oriented research ethics: integrating relational and everyday ethics in research

References

• Allen, J., and B. McNamara. 2011. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research. Bioethics 25 (3):155–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01749.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. E., and J. E. Sieber. 2009. The need for evidence-based research ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):60–62. doi:10.1080/15265160903234060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. E., and J. M. DuBois. 2007. The need for evidence-based research ethics: A review of the substance abuse literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 86 (2–3):95–105. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, G., and M. V. Rorty. 2001. Key points for developing an international declaration on nursing, human rights, human genetics and public health policy. Nursing Ethics 8 (3):259–71. doi:10.1177/096973300100800310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. A., B. Sawatzky-Girling, M. McDonald, D. Pullman, R. Saginur, H. A. Sampson, and D. J. Willison. 2011. Research ethics broadly writ: Beyond REB review. Health Law Review 19 (3):12–24.
   Google Scholar
• Azzarito, L. 2016. Moving in my world: From school PE to participants-centered art exhibitions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 35 (1):38–53. doi:10.1123/jtpe.2014-0189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S., A. Armstrong, K. Carter, H. Graham, P. Hayward, A. Henry, T. Holland, C. Holmes, A. Lee, and A. McNulty. 2013. Everyday ethics in community-based participatory research. Contemporary Social Science 8 (3):263–77. doi:10.1080/21582041.2013.769618.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, E., E. Racine, P. Chiasson, M. Dufourcq-Brana, L. B. Dunn, J. J. Fins, P. J. Ford, W. Glannon, N. Lipsman, and M. E. Macdonald. 2014. Beyond consent in research: Revisiting vulnerability in deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (3):361–68. doi:10.1017/S0963180113000984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, J. A. H., and L. G. Balneaves. 2015. Cancer patient decision making related to clinical trial participation: An integrative review with implications for patients’ relational autonomy. Supportive Care in Cancer 23 (4):1169–96. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2581-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, P., C. Tanner, and C. Chelsa. 2009. The primacy of caring, the role of experience, narrative and community in clinical and ethical expertise. In Expertise in nursing practice, ed. P. Benner, C. Tanner, and C. Chelsa, 279–307. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, J., P. Appelbaum, C. Lidz, and L. Parker, ed. 2001. Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., and H. Andersson. 2015. The person and the variable in developmental psychology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 218:155–65. doi:10.1027/0044-3409/a000025.
   Google Scholar
• Björnsdóttir, K., G. V. Stefánsdóttir, and Á. Stefánsdóttir. 2014. ‘It’s my life’: Autonomy and people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 19 (1):5–21. doi:10.1177/1744629514564691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken-Roche, D., and E. Racine. Under review. Enriching the concept of vulnerability in research ethics: An integrative and functional account. Bioethics.
   Google Scholar
• Brendel, D. H., and F. G. Miller. 2008. A plea for pragmatism in clinical research ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24–31. doi:10.1080/15265160802166025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosnan, C., A. Cribb, S. P. Wainwright, and C. Williams. 2013. Neuroscientists’ everyday experiences of ethics: The interplay of regulatory, professional, personal and tangible ethical spheres. Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (8):1133–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. E., and D. W. Brock. 1990. Deciding for others: The ethics of surrogate decision making. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, S., and K. Moss. 2006. US health researchers review their ethics review boards: A qualitative study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 (2):39–58. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.2.39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). 2011. Canada’s strategy for patient-oriented research: Improving health outcomes through evidence-informed care. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. 2014. Tri-council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Ottawa, ON: Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research.
   Google Scholar
• Cascio, M.A., J. Weiss, and E. Racine. 2017. Get involved! – The person-oriented ethics for autism research project. Poster and talk presented at the Brain-Child-Partners Conference, Toronto, ON, Canada, November 6- 8.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, L., M. T. King, Y.-H. Jeon, H. Brodaty, J. Stein-Parbury, R. Norman, M. Haas, and G. Luscombe. 2009. Caring for Aged Dementia Care Resident Study (CADRES) of person-centred care, dementia-care mapping, and usual care in dementia: A cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet Neurology 8 (4):317–25. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70045-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collie, P., J. Liu, A. Podsiadlowski, and S. Kindon. 2010. You can’t clap with one hand: Learnings to promote culturally grounded participatory action research with migrant and former refugee communities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 34 (2):141–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordner, A., D. Ciplet, P. Brown, and R. Morello-Frosch. 2012. Reflexive research ethics for environmental health and justice: Academics and movement building. Social Movement Studies 11 (2):161–76. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.664898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cridland, E. K., S. C. Jones, P. Caputi, and C. A. Magee. 2015. Qualitative research with families living with autism spectrum disorder: Recommendations for conducting semistructured interviews. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 40 (1):78–91. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.964191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csordas, T. J. 1994. Self and person. In Psychological anthropology, ed. P. K. Bock, 331–50. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. L., M. Weaver, B. Habermann, and K. Buckwalter. 2005. Participant-centered adaptations in caregiver trials: Strategies for managing confounds. Nursing Outlook 53 (2):73–78. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2004.05.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, L., and N. E. Kass. 2005. Views of US researchers about informed consent in international collaborative research. Social Science & Medicine 61 (6):1211–22. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demertzi, A., E. Racine, M.-A. Bruno, D. Ledoux, O. Gosseries, A. Vanhaudenhuyse, M. Thonnard, A. Soddu, G. Moonen, and S. Laureys. 2013. Pain perception in disorders of consciousness: Neuroscience, clinical care, and ethics in dialogue. Neuroethics 6:37–50. doi:10.1007/s12152-011-9149-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. Protection of human subjects. In Title 45 code of federal regulations part 46. Washington DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, C., E. Bell, N. Palmour, B. Pike, J. Doyon, and E. Racine. 2010. Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5 (1):49–66. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doernberg, S. N., and D. Wendler. 2016. Ensuring respect for human research participants: Institutional review boards and sharing results from research. JAMA 316 (11):1149–50. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.7970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, H. 2002. L’éthique de la recherche : guide pour le chercheur en sciences de la santé. Montréal, QC: Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Dresser, R. 2015. What subjects teach: The everyday ethics of human research. Wake Forest Law Review 50:301–41.
   Google Scholar
• Dyke, S. O. M., W. A. Cheung, Y. Joly, O. Ammerpohl, P. Lutsik, M. A. Rothstein, M. Caron, S. Busche, G. Bourque, L. Rönnblom, P. Flicek, S. Beck, M. Hirst, H. Stunnenberg, R. Siebert, J. Walter, and T. Pastinen. 2015. Epigenome data release: A participant-centered approach to privacy protection. Genome Biology 16:142. doi:10.1186/s13059-015-0723-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ells, C., M. R. Hunt, and J. Chambers-Evans. 2011. Relational autonomy as an essential component of patient-centered care. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):79–101. doi:10.3138/ijfab.4.2.79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E. J., and C. Grady. 2007. Four paradigms of clinical research and research oversight. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (1):82–96. doi:10.1017/S0963180107070090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B. 2002. A goodness-of-fit ethic for informed consent. Fordham Urban Law Journal 30:159–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher, C. B. 2003a. A goodness-of-fit ethic for child assent to nonbeneficial research. The American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):27–28. doi:10.1162/152651603322614490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B. 2003b. Goodness-of-fit ethic for informed consent to research involving adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 9 (1):27–31. doi:10.1002/mrdd.10052.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Founds, S. A. 2007. Participating in research for pregnancy complicated by Breech. Health Care for Women International 28 (6):573–89. doi:10.1080/07399330701334596.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friesen, P., L. Kearns, B. Redman, and A. L. Caplan. 2017. Rethinking the belmont report? The American Journal of Bioethics 17 (7):15–21. doi:10.1080/15265161.2017.1329482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, D., and L. Fogg. 2001. Clinical trials in the 21st century: The case for participant-centered research. Research in Nursing & Health 24 (6):530–39. doi:10.1002/nur.10010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., and L. Gillam. 2004. Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2):261–80. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guta, A., S. Nixon, J. Gahagan, and S. Fielden. 2012. “Walking along beside the researcher”: How Canadian REBs/IRBs are responding to the needs of community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 7 (1):17–27. doi:10.1525/jer.2012.7.1.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and A. Honey. 2007. Rethinking ethics review as institutional discourse. Qualitative Inquiry 13 (3):336–52. doi:10.1177/1077800406297651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2003. Time to make up your mind: Why choosing is difficult. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 31 (1):3–8. doi:10.1046/j.1468-3156.2003.00181.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hollan, D. 1997. The relevance of person-centered ethnography to cross-cultural psychiatry. Transcultural Psychiatry 34 (2):219–34. doi:10.1177/136346159703400203.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Iphofen, R. 2011. Ethical decision making in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 11 (4):443–46. doi:10.1177/1468794111404330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacklin, K., and P. Kinoshameg. 2008. Developing a participatory aboriginal health research project: “Only if it’s going to mean something”. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 3 (2):53–67. doi:10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judkins-Cohn, T. M., K. Kielwasser-Withrow, M. Owen, and J. Ward. 2014. Ethical principles of informed consent: Exploring nurses’ dual role of care provider and researcher. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 45 (1):35–42. doi:10.3928/00220124-20131223-03.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M. 2009. Evidence-based research ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6–7):85–87. doi:10.1080/15265160902923457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, J., L. Curren, N. Anderson, K. Edwards, S. M. Fullerton, N. Kanellopoulou, D. Lund, et al. 2012. From patients to partners: Participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nature Reviews Genetics 13 (5):371-376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodyakov, D., L. Mikesell, R. Schraiber, M. Booth, and E. Bromley. 2016. On using ethical principles of community-engaged research in translational science. Translational Research 171:52.e1–62.e1. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2015.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost, R. G., L. M. Lee, J. Yessis, R. A. Wesley, D. K. Henderson, and B. S. Coller. 2013. Assessing participant-centered outcomes to improve clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 369 (23):2179–81. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1311461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost, R. G., L. N. Lee, J. L. Yessis, R. Wesley, S. Alfano, S. R. Alexander, S. B. Kassis, P. Cola, A. Dozier, D. E. Ford, P. A. Harris, E. Kim, S. C. Lee, G. O’Riordan, M. T. Roth, K. Schuff, J. Wasser, D. K. Henderson, and B. S. Coller. 2014. Research participant-centered outcomes at NIH-supported clinical research centers. Clinical and Translational Science 7 (6):430–40. doi:10.1111/cts.12167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahman, M. K. E., B. M. Mendoza, K. L. Rodriguez, and J. L. Schwartz. 2011b. Undocumented research participants: Ethics and protection in a time of fear. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 33 (3):304–22. doi:10.1177/0739986311414162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahman, M. K. E., M. R. Geist, K. L. Rodriguez, P. Graglia, and K. K. DeRoche. 2011a. Culturally responsive relational reflexive ethics in research: The three Rs. Quality & Quantity 45 (6):1397–414. doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9347-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, S., T. Jarus, and M. J. Suto. 2012. A scoping review of the photovoice method: Implications for occupational therapy research. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue canadienne d'ergothérapie 79 (3):181–90. doi:10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeVine, R. A. 1982. Culture, behavior, and personality. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtner, V. 2014. The everyday ethics of field work research with vulnerable patients. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics 205:813–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mackenzie, C., and N. Stoljar. 2000. Relational autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, D. J. H., J. J. Fins, and E. Racine. 2018. The therapeutic “mis”conception: An examination of its normative assumptions and a call for its revision. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (1):154–62. doi:10.1017/S0963180117000482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, H. 2009. What’s in a name: “Client”, “patient”, “customer”, “consumer”, “expert by experience”, “service user” — What’s next? British Journal of Social Work 39 (6):1101–17. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloni, F., K. Vanthuyne, and C. Rousseau. 2015. Towards a relational ethics: Rethinking ethics, agency and dependency in research with children and youth. Anthropological Theory 15 (1):106–23. doi:10.1177/1463499614565945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., and A. J. S. Morin. 2016. A person-centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology. Journal of Organizational Behavior 37 (4):584–612. doi:10.1002/job.2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S., and L. H. Yoder. 2012. A concept analysis of person-centered care. Journal of Holistic Nursing 30 (1):6–15. doi:10.1177/0898010111412189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2016. Mentored patient-oriented research career development award (parent K23), FOA PA-16-198. Last modified April 15, 2016. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-16-198.html ( accessed August 31).
   Google Scholar
• Oviedo-Joekes, E., K. Marchand, K. Lock, S. MacDonald, D. Guh, and M. T. Schechter. 2015. The SALOME study: Recruitment experiences in a clinical trial offering injectable diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone for opioid dependency. Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention and Policy 10:3. doi:10.1186/1747-597x-10-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilapil, R. D. 2012. From psychologism to personhood: Honneth, recognition, and the making of persons. Res Publica 18:39–51. doi:10.1007/s11158-012-9184-4.
   Google Scholar
• Price, A., P. Chatterjee, and R. Biswas. 2014. Time for person centered research in neuroscience: Users driving the change. Annals of Neurosciences 21 (2):37–40. doi:10.5214/ans.0972.7531.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Racine, E., E. Bell and C. Deslauriers. 2010. Canadian research ethics boardsand multi-site research: Experiences from two minimal risk studies. IRB: Ethics and Human Research 32(3):12-18.
   Google Scholar
• Racine, E. 2010. Pragmatic neuroethics: Improving treatment and understanding of the mind-brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Racine, E., J. Aspler, C. Forlini, and J. Chandler. 2017. Contextualized autonomy and liberalism: Broadening the lenses on complementary and alternative medicines in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 27 (1):1–41. doi:10.1353/ken.2017.0002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racine, E., and V. Dubljević. 2016. Porous or contextualized autonomy? Knowledge can empower autonomous moral agents. The American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):48–50. doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1120800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racine, E., and V. Dubljević. 2017. Behavioral and brain-based research on free moral agency: Threatening or empowering? In Neuroethics: Anticipating the future, ed. J. Illes and S. Hossain, 388–410. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ridpath, J. R., C. J. Wiese, and S. M. Greene. 2009. Looking at research consent forms through a participant-centered lens: The PRISM readability toolkit. American Journal of Health Promotion 23 (6):371–75. doi:10.4278/ajhp.080613-CIT-94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. L., C. G. Emden, T. D. Croft, G. C. Vosper, J. A. Elder, C. Stirling, and J. C. Vickers. 2011. Mixed methods data collection in dementia research: A “progressive engagement” approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 5 (4):330–44. doi:10.1177/1558689811416940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, D. J. 1991. Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. 2015. The censor’s hand: The misregulation of human-subject research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, C. T., and L. E. Ferris. 2010. A case for a charter of participant rights in pre-market drug trials: The next evolution. Medicine & Law 29 (2):239–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shore, N., E. Drew, R. Brazauskas, and S. D. Seifer. 2011. Relationships between community-based processes for research ethics review and institution-based IRBs: A national study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6 (2):13–21. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, G. M. 2012. Conviction without being convinced: Maintaining Islamic certainty in Minangkabau, Indonesia. Ethos 40 (3):237–57. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1352.2012.01256.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisti, D., and J. Stramondo. 2015. Competence, voluntariness, and oppressive socialization: A feminist critique of the threshold elements of informed consent. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 8 (1):67–85. doi:10.3138/ijfab.8.1.0067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyrme, S. 2016. Living with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Relational autonomy and decision-making. Children & Society 30 (3):220–29. doi:10.1111/chso.12134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, L. 2006. Person-centredness: A concept analysis. Contemporary Nurse 23 (1):135–44. doi:10.5172/conu.2006.23.1.135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tamariz, L., H. Medina, J. Taylor, O. Carrasquillo, E. Kobetz, and A. Palacio. 2015. Are research ethics committees prepared for community-based participatory research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10 (5):488–95. doi:10.1177/1556264615615008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudel, P., and M. S. Jean, ed. 2010. La malréglementation : une éthique de la recherche est-elle possible et à quelles conditions? Montréal, QC: Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Turoldo, F. 2010. Relational autonomy and multiculturalism. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (4):542–49. doi:10.1017/s0963180110000496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1978. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Bethesda, MD: The Commission.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W. C., and A. Hamilton, ed. 2016. The ethics rupture: Exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Scott, L.-J. K. 2016. The socialization of contemporary students by ethics boards: Malaise and ethics for graduate students. In The ethics rupture: Exploring alternatives to formal research ethics review, ed. W. C. van den Hoonaard and A. Hamilton, 230–66. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veatch, R. 1987. The patient as partner: A theory of human-experimentation ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaven, M., and T. Clark. 2013. ‘I guess it scares us’ – Teachers discuss the teaching of poetry in senior secondary English. English in Education 47 (3):197–212. doi:10.1111/eie.12016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, S. N., K. Alcser, C. Schneider, L. B. McCullough, A. L. McGuire, and R. J. Volk. 2008. Principal investigator views of the IRB system. International Journal of Medical Sciences 5 (2):68–72. doi:10.7150/ijms.5.68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whittle, J., K. E. Fletcher, J. Morzinski, K. Ertl, L. Patterson, W. Jensen, and M. M. Schapira. 2010. Ethical challenges in a randomized controlled trial of peer education among veterans service organizations. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5 (4):43–51. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.4.43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V., L. Ponting, and K. Ford. 2015. A platform for change? Inclusive research about “choice and control’. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 43 (2):106–13. doi:10.1111/bld.12123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein, C. J., J. P. Miller, S. Blanton, E. Taub, G. Uswatte, D. Morris, D. Nichols, and S. Wolf. 2003. Methods for a multisite randomized trial to investigate the effect of constraint-induced movement therapy in improving upper extremity function among adults recovering from a cerebrovascular stroke. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair 17 (3):137–52. doi:10.1177/0888439003255511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizzo, N., E. Bell, and E. Racine. 2016. What is everyday ethics? A review and a proposal for an integrative concept. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 27 (2):117–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar