Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior

References

• Ana, J., T. Koehlmoos, R. Smith, and L. L. Yan. 2013. Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med 10 (3):e1001315. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. E., S. Solomon, E. Heitman, J. M. DuBois, C. B. Fisher, R. G. Kost, M. E. Lawless, et al. 2012. Research ethics education for community-engaged research: A review and research agenda. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE 7 (2):3–19. doi:10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., B. C. Martinson, and R. de Vries. 2007. Normative dissonance in science: Results from a national survey of u.s. Scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE 2 (4):3–14. doi:10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, M., and J. M. Wicherts. 2011. The (mis) reporting of statistical results in psychology journals. Behavior Research Methods 43 (3):666–78. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0089-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and J. Youtie. 2016. Trouble in paradise: Problems in academic research co-authoring. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (6):1717–43. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9722-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. S., M. Riske-Morris, and S. R. Diaz. 2007. Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):395–414. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, R., M. S. Anderson, and B. C. Martinson. 2006. Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE 1 (1):43–50. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois, J. M., E. E. Anderson, J. Chibnall, K. Carroll, T. Gibb, C. Ogbuka, and T. Rubbelke. 2013. Understanding research misconduct: A comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Accountability in Research 20 (5–6):320–38. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One 4 (5):e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2010. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data. PLoS One 5 (4):e10271. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D., R. Costas, and V. Larivière. 2015. Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS One 10 (6):e0127556. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F. C., J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall. 2013. Males are overrepresented among life science researchers committing scientific misconduct. MBio 4 (1):e00640–12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00640-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, S. L. 2016. Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: Prevalence and causal factors. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 21 (1):15–21. doi:10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B., G. Helgesson, N. Juth, and S. Holm. 2015. Scientific dishonesty: A survey of doctoral students at the major medical faculties in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10:380–88. doi:10.1177/1556264615599686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B., and S. Holm. 2016. Research misconduct: Knowledge, actions and attitudes of PhD candidates. Journal for the Norwegian Medical Association 136 (17):1442–47. doi:10.4045/tidsskr.16.0149.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, B., A. I. Myhr, and S. Holm. 2013. Scientific dishonesty–A nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway. BMC Medical Ethics 14:3. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S., and B. Hofmann. 2017. Investigating the reliability and factor structure of Kalichman’s “Survey 2: Research misconduct” Questionnaire: A post hoc analysis among biomedical doctoral students in Scandinavia. Journal Empir Researcher Human Researcher Ethics:1556264617714658. doi:10.1177/1556264617714658.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. B., K. O. Kyvik, R. Leth-Larsen, and M. B. Eriksen. 2018. Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark. Danish Medical Journal 65 (4):1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, L. K., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science 23 (5):524–32. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. 2014. The integrity of science - lost in translation? Best Practice & Research. Clinical Gastroenterology 28 (2):339–47. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2014.03.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M. W., and P. J. Friedman. 1992. A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 67 (11):769–75. doi:10.1097/00001888-199211000-00015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komic, D., S. L. Marusic, and A. Marusic. 2015. Research integrity and research ethics in professional codes of ethics: Survey of terminology used by professional organizations across research disciplines. PLoS One 10 (7):e0133662. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafollette, M. C. 2000. The evolution of the “scientific misconduct” issue: An historical overview. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.) 224 (4):211–15. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22423.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, A. L. Crain, and R. de Vries. 2006. Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE 1 (1):51–66. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., A. L. Crain, M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2009. Institutions’ expectations for researchers’ self-funding, federal grant holding, and private industry involvement: Manifold drivers of self-interest and researcher behavior. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 84 (11):1491–99. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb2ca6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marusic, A., L. Bosnjak, and A. Jeroncic. 2011. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLoS One 6 (9):e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge, J., M. De Bruin, and J. Witton. 2012. The effects of demand characteristics on research participant behaviours in non-laboratory settings: A systematic review. PLoS One 7 (6):e39116. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilstun, T., R. Lofmark, and A. Lundqvist. 2010. Scientific dishonesty–Questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (5):315–18. doi:10.1136/jme.2009.033654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okonta, P. I., and T. Rossouw. 2014. Misconduct in research: A descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country. BMC Medical Ethics 15:25. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, E. R., B. Habermann, and M. E. Broome. 2007. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: A national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):365–69. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pupovac, V., and D. Fanelli. 2015. Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5):1331–52. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranstam, J., M. Buyse, S. L. George, S. Evans, N. L. Geller, B. Scherrer, E. Lesaffre, G. Murray, L. Edler, and J. L. Hutton. 2000. Fraud in medical research: An international survey of biostatisticians. Controlled Clinical Trials 21 (5):415–27. doi:10.1016/S0197-2456(00)00069-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Redman, B. K., H. N. Yarandi, and J. F. Merz. 2008. Empirical developments in retraction. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):807–09. doi:10.1136/jme.2007.023069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar, U., and M. Nicolaou. 2012. Fraud and deceit in medical research. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences: the Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 17 (11):1077–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurin, T. A. 2016. Ethics in publishing: Complexity science and human factors offer insights to develop a just culture. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (6):1849–54. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9735-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, A. M., A. Casadevall, R. G. Steen, and F. C. Fang. 2014. Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications. Elife 3:e02956. doi:10.7554/eLife.02956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J. K., L. M. Bouter, C. L. S. Veldkamp, P. M. van de Ven, J. M. Wicherts, and Y. M. Smulders. 2016. Personality traits are associated with research misbehavior in dutch scientists: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One 11 (9):e0163251. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J. K., R. Verbeke, and Y. M. Smulders. 2014. Publication pressure and scientific misconduct in medical scientists. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics : JERHRE 9 (5):64–71. doi:10.1177/1556264614552421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar