References
- Abbott, A., D. Cyranoski, N. Jones, B. Maher, Q. Schiermeier, and R. Van Noorden. 2010. “Metrics: Do Metrics Matter?” Nature News 465 (7300): 860–862. doi:10.1038/465860a.
- Adler, R., J. Ewing, and P. Taylor. 2009. “Citation Statistics. A Report from the International Mathematical Union (IMU) in Cooperation with the International Council of Industrial and Applied Mathematics (ICIAM) and the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (IMS).” Statistical Science 24 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1214/09-STS285.
- Aksnes, D. W. 2003. “Characteristics of Highly Cited Papers.” Research Evaluation 12 (3): 159–170. doi:10.3152/147154403781776645.
- Alonso, S., F. J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera. 2009. “h-Index: A Review Focused in Its Variants, Computation and Standardization for Different Scientific Fields.” Journal of Informetrics 3 (4): 273–289. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001.
- Bertoli-Barsotti, L. 2015. “Normalizing the G-Index.” Scientometrics 106 (2): 645–655. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1794-0.
- Binswanger, M. 2015. “How Nonsense Became Excellence: Forcing Professors to Publish.” In Incentives and Performance, edited by I. M. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, and M. Osterloh, 19–32. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
- Bornmann, L., R. Mutz, and H. D. Daniel. 2010. “The H-Index Research Output Measurement: Two Approaches to Enhance Its Accuracy.” Journal of Informetrics 4 (3): 407–414. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.005.
- Bornmann, L., R. Mutz, S. E. Hug, and H. D. Daniel. 2011. “A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Studies Reporting Correlations between the H Index and 37 Different H-Index Variants.” Journal of Informetrics 5 (3): 346–359. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006.
- Brezina, I., J. Pekar, Z. Cickova, and M. Reiff. 2016. “Herfindahl-Hirschman Index Level of Concentration Values Modification and Analysis of Their Change.” Central European Journal of Operations Research 24 (1): 49–72. doi:10.1007/s10100-014-0350-y.
- Costas, R., and M. Bordons. 2007. “The H-Index: Advantages, Limitations and Its Relation with Other Bibliometric Indicators at the Micro Level.” Journal of Informetrics 1 (3): 193–203. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001.
- Costas, R., and M. Bordons. 2008. “Is G-Index Better than H-Index? an Exploratory Study at the Individual Level.” Scientometrics 77 (2): 267–288. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0.
- Editorial. 2005. “The Cost of Salami Slicing.” Nature Materials 4 (1): 1. doi:10.1038/nmat1305.
- Egghe, L. 2009. “An Econometric Property of the G-Index.” Information Processing & Management 45 (4): 484–489. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.04.001.
- Gagolewski, M. 2013. “Scientific Impact Assessment Cannot Be Fair.” Journal of Informetrics 7 (4): 792–802. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.001.
- Gagolewski, M., and P. Grzegorzewski. 2009. “A Geometric Approach to the Construction of Scientific Impact Indices.” Scientometrics 81 (3): 617–634. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2253-y.
- Genova, G., H. Astudillo, and A. Fraga. 2016. “The Scientometric Bubble Considered Harmful.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1): 227–235. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9632-6.
- Hicks, D., P. Wouters, L. Waltman, S. De Rijcke, and I. Rafols. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.” Nature News & Comment 520: 429–431. doi:10.1038/520429a.
- Hirsch, J. E. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (46): 16569–16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
- Hoit, J. D. 2007. “Salami Science.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 16 (2): 94. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/013).
- Jefferson, T. 1998. “Redundant Publication in Biomedical Sciences: Scientific Misconduct or Necessity?” Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2): 135–140.
- Lehmann, S., A. D. Jackson, and B. E. Lautrup. 2008. “A Quantitative Analysis of Indicators of Scientific Performance.” Scientometrics 76 (2): 369–390. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1868-8.
- Martin, B. R., and J. Irvine. 1983. “Assessing Basic Research.” Research Policy 12 (2): 61–90. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7.
- Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science: The Reward and Communication Systems of Science are Considered.” Science 159 (3810): 56–63. doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
- Parnas, D. 2007. “Stop the Numbers Game.” Communications of the ACM 50 (11): 19–21. doi:10.1145/1297797.
- Rousseau, R. 2006. “New Developments Related to the Hirsch Index.” Science Focus 4 (1): 23–25.
- Sandstrom, U., and A. Wold. 2015. “Centres of Excellence: Reward for Gender or Top-Level Research?.” In RJ Yearbook 2015/2016, edited by J. Björkman and B. Fjaestad, 69–89. Makadam Publishers.
- Waltman, L., and N. J. Van Eck. 2012. “The Inconsistency of the H-Index.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (2): 406–415. doi:10.1002/asi.v63.2.
- Wang, J. 2013. “Citation Time Window Choice for Research Impact Evaluation.” Scientometrics 94 (3): 851–872. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9.
- Wohlin, C. 2009. “A New Index for the Citation Curve of Researchers.” Scientometrics 81 (2): 521–533. doi:10.1007/s11192-008-2155-z.
- Ye, F., and R. Rousseau. 2010. “Probing the H-Core: An Investigation of the Tail-Core Ratio for Rank Distributions.” Scientometrics 84 (2): 431–439. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0099-6.
- Zhang, C. T. 2009. “The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations.” PLoS ONE 4 (5): e5429. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005429.
- Zhang, C. T. 2013a. “The h’-Index, Effectively Improving the h-Index Based of the Citation Distribution.” PLoS ONE 8 (4): e59912. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059912.
- Zhang, C. T. 2013b. “A Novel Triangle Mapping Technique to Study the H-Index Based Citation Distribution.” Scientific Reports 3 (1023): 1–5.