Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand

References

• Adams, P., J. Kaewkungwal, C. Limphattharacharoen, S. Prakobtham, K. Pengsaa, and S. Khusmith. 2014. “Is Your Ethics Committee Efficient? Using “IRB Metrics” as a Self-Assessment Tool for Continuous Improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.” PloS one 9 (11): e113356. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, P., W. Wongwit, K. Pengsaa, S. Khusmith, W. Fungladda, W. Chaiyaphan, C. Limphattharacharoen, S. Prakobtham, and J. Kaewkungwal. 2013. “Ethical Issues in Research Involving Minority Populations: The Process and Outcomes of Protocol Review by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.” BMC Medical Ethics 14: 33. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addissie, A., G. Davey, M. J. Newport, T. Addissie, H. MacGregor, Y. Feleke, and B. Farsides. 2014. “A Mixed-Methods Study on Perceptions Towards Use of Rapid Ethical Assessment to Improve Informed Consent Processes for Health Research in A Low-Income Setting.” BMC Medical Ethics 15: 35. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AERA (American Educational Research Association). 2011. “AERA Code of Ethics: American Educational Research Association Approved by the AERA Council.” Educational Researcher 40 (3): 145–156. doi:10.3102/0013189X11410403.
   Google Scholar
• Angell, E. L., C. J. Jackson, R. E. Ashcroft, A. Bryman, K. Windridge, and M. Dixon-Woods. 2007. “Dixon-Woods. Is ‘Inconsistency’ in Research Ethics Committee Decision-Making Really a Problem? an Empirical Investigation and Reflection.” Clinical Ethics 2 (2): 92–99. doi:10.1258/147775007781029500.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuvaneshwari, S., D. Vijaya, and P. Hema. 2011. “Knowledge and Awareness about Research Ethics and Ethics Committees among Engineers.” International Journal of Pharmaceutical & Biological Archives 4 (6): 1155–1157. https://www.ijpba.info/ijpba/index.php/ijpba/article/download/1188/846/
   Google Scholar
• CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences). 2016. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans. 5th ed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Danis, M., E. Largent, C. Grady, D. Wendler, J. C. Hull, S. Shah, J. Millum, and B. Berkman. 2012. Research Ethics Consultation: A Casebook. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H., F. Wells, and M. Czarkowski. 2009. “Standards for Research Ethics Committees: Purpose, Problems and the Possibilities of Other Approaches.” Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6): 382–383. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.027722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derenzo, E., and J. Moss. 2006. Writing Clinical Research Protocol: Ethical Considerations. CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emanuel, E., R. A. Crouch, J. D. Arras, J. Moreno, and C. Grady. 2003. Ethical and Regulatory Aspects of Clinical Research: Readings and Commentary. MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• FDA (Thailand Food and Drug Administration). 2000. “ICH Good Clinical Practice Guideline (Thai Language Version).” http://ird.sut.ac.th/irdnew/Files/Downloads/IRD/Human/ICH_GCP_ThaiVer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FERCIT (Forum for Ethical Committees in Thailand). 2007. “The Ethical Guidelines for Research on Human Subject in Thailand.” http://www.fercit.org/file/Guideline_English_version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fuoka, G., and M. Mantzorou. 2011. “What are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research? Is There a Conflict between the Research Ethics and the Nature of Nursing?” Health Science Journal 5 (1): 3–14. http://www.hsj.gr/medicine/what-are-the-major-ethical-issues-in-conducting-research-is-there-a-conflict-between-the-research-ethics-and-the-nature-of-nursing.php?aid=3485
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear-Smith, F., B. Lobb, G. Davies, I. Nachson, and S. M. Seelau. 2002. “International Variation in Ethics Committee Requirements: Comparisons across Five Westernised Nations“. BMC Medical Ethics 3: E2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC111059/
   Google Scholar
• Grady, C. 2009. “Vulnerability in Research: Individuals with Limited Financial And/Or Social Resources.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (1): 19–27. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00347.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., L. Gillam, D. Rosenthal, and A. Bolitho. 2008. Investigating Human Research Ethics in Practice: Project Report. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Guraya, S. Y., N. J. M. London, and S. S. Guraya. 2014. “Ethics in Medical Research.” Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2 (3): 121–126. doi:10.1016/j.jmau.2014.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Health Research Authority. 2007. “Quality Assurance.” http://www.hra.nhs.uk/about-the-hra/governance/quality-assurance.
   Google Scholar
• Helena, M. 2013. “Applying Ethical Principles in Researching a Vulnerable Population: Homeless Women in Brisbane.” Current Issues in Criminal Justice 25: 1. https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/56899/88936_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HHS (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services). 2002. “OHRP QA Self Assessment Tool.” http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/education/qip/ohrp_ded_qatool.html
   Google Scholar
• HHS (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.) 2005. “IRBs and Assurances.” http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/assurances
   Google Scholar
• Ibingira, C. B. R., and J. Ocheing. 2010. “Attitudes and Perceptions about the Research and Ethics Committee in Kampala, Uganda.” The International Journal of Medicine 3 (2): 347–351.
   Google Scholar
• Kolman, J. M., N. P. Wray, C. M. Ashton, D. M. Wenner, A. F. Jarman, and B. A. Brody. 2012. “Conflicts among Multinational Ethical and Scientific Standards for Clinical Trials of Therapeutic Interventions.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40 (1): 99–121. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00649.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, J. W. 2016. “Mapping the Review of Ethics in Research: The Work of National Health Service (NHS) Research Ethics Committees in England.” University of Salford. http://usir.salford.ac.uk/41543/1/signedoffcopy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Munoli, S., G. Niveditha, and R. Deepthi. 2017. “Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Research Ethics among Medical Faculty in a Teaching Hospital.” International Journal Basic Clinical Pharmacology Annual Performance Report 6 (4): 913–918. doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20171103.
   Google Scholar
• NHMRC (National Health and Medical Research Council), Australian Research Council. 2007. “Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Australian Government. https://nhmrc.gov.au/file/1996/download?token=L_zdA1Lq.
   Google Scholar
• NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2016. “Guidelines and Policies for the Conduct of Research in the Intramural Research Program at NIH.” 5th ed. https://oir.nih.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/sourcebook/documents/ethical_conduct/guidelines-conduct_research.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2002. “Exploring Ethical Issues in Biology and Medicine.” http://nuffieldbioethics.org/report/research-developing-countries-2/chapter-downloads
   Google Scholar
• OHRP (Office for Human Research Protections). 2009. “Protection of Human Subjects: Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations Part 46 Revised.” Accessed January 15 2009. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/ohrp/humansubjects/regbook2013.pdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Psychiatrists. 2011. Ethics of Psychiatric Research. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists. https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/cr82ii.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, G. M. 2007. “Should Research Ethics Committees Be Told How to Think?” Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (1): 39–42. doi:10.1136/jme.2005.014688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2003. “Five Principles for Research Ethics: Cover Your Bases with These Ethical Strategies.” American Psychological Association 34: 1. http://www.apa.org/monitor/jan03/principles.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Steering Committee on Bioethics. 2012. “Guide for Research Ethics Committee Members.” Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680307e6c
   Google Scholar
• TMC (The Medical Council). 1982. “Medical Profession Act BE 2525 (1982).” https://www.tmc.or.th/En/assets/files/file_actBE2525.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TMC (The Medical Council). 2006. “Medical Council Regulations on Medical Ethics Preservation.” BE 2549 (AD 2006) I/IV. http://tmc.or.th/En/assets/files/file_BE2549.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Underhill, K. 2014. “Legal and Ethical Values in the Resolution of Research-Related Disputes: How Can IRBS Respond to Participant Complaints?” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (1): 71–82. doi:10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2006. Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. France: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001461/146180E.pdf
   Google Scholar
• University of Cambridge: Research Integrity. 2017. “Applying for Ethical Approval: Basic Principles”. University of Cambridge. Accessed 2017. https://www.research-integrity.admin.cam.ac.uk/research-ethics/ethics-application-guidance/applying-ethical-approval-basic-principles
   Google Scholar
• Vallely, A., S. Lees, C. Shagi, S. Kasindi, S. Soteli, N. Kavit, L. Vallely, S. McCormack, R. Pool, and R. J. Hayes. 2010. “How Informed Is Consent in Vulnerable Populations? Experience Using a Continuous Consent Process during the MDP301 Vaginal Microbicide Trial in Mwanza, Tanzania.” BMC Medical Ethics 11: 10. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-11-10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). 2009. Research Ethics Committees: Basic Concepts for Capacity-Building. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document Production Services.
   Google Scholar
• WHO/TDR. 2000. Operational Guidelines for Ethics Committees that Review Biomedical Research. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/ethics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WHO/TDR. 2002. Surveying and Evaluating Ethical Review Practices. Geneva: World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/ethics2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams-Jones, B., M. J. Potvin, G. Mathieu, and E. Smith. 2013. “Barriers to Research on Research Ethics Review and Conflicts of Interest.” IRB: Ethics & Human Research 35 (5): 14–19. https://www.thehastingscenter.org/wp-content/uploads/williams-jones.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WMA (World Medical Association). 2013. “Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.” https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DoH-Oct2013-JAMA.pdf
   Google Scholar