References
- BBC. 2019. “He Jiankui: China Condemns ‘Baby Gene Editing’ Scientist.” BBC online January 21. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-46943593
- Chen, L., and Z. Zhang. 2018. Chinese Public Attitudes on Gene Editing. Guangzhou, Guangdong, China: Sun Yat-Sen University.
- Hurlbut, J. B. 2019. “Human Genome Editing: Ask Whether, Not How.” Nature 565: 135. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07881-1.
- Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Jasanoff, S., J. B. Hurlbut, and K. Saha. 2015. “CRISPR Democracy: Gene Editing and the Need for Inclusive Deliberation.” Issues in Science and Technology 32 (1). https://issues.org/crispr-democracy-gene-editing-and-the-need-for-inclusive-deliberation/
- Juengst, E. T. 2017. “Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing?” Hastings Center Report 47 (3): 15–23. doi:10.1002/hast.701.
- Kass, L. R. 1971. “The New Biology: What Price Relieving Man’s Estate?” Science 174 (4011): 779–788. doi:10.1126/science.174.4011.779.
- Kim, S. Y. H., I. F. Wall, A. Stanczyk, and R. De Vies. 2009. “Assessing the Public’s Views in Research Ethics Controversies: Deliberative Democracy and Bioethics as Natural Allies.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 4 (4): 3–16. doi:10.1525/jer2009.4.4.3.
- Kimmelman, J., and A. J. London. 2011. “Predicting Harms and Benefits in Translational Trials: Ethics, Evidence, and Uncertainty.” PLoS Medicine 8 (3): e1001010. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001010.
- King, N. M. P., and A. S. Iltis. 2014. “Cell-Based Interventions in Utero: Time to Reconsider.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 5: 214. doi:10.3389/fphar.2014.00214.
- Longino, H. E. 2002. The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Maienschein, J., M. Sunderland, R. A. Ankeny, and J. S. Robert. 2008. “The Ethos and Ethics of Translational Research.” The American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3): 43–51. doi:10.1080/15265160802109314.
- NASEM. 2017. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/24623.
- NASEM. 2019. Second International Summit on Human Genome Editing: Continuing the Global Discussion: Proceedings of a Workshop–in Brief. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/25343.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). 2015. On Human Genome Editing: International Summit Statement. Washington D.C: National Academy Press. http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=12032015a
- Regalado, A. 2018. “EXCLUSIVE: Chinese Scientists are Creating CRISPR Babies.” MIT Technology Review. November 25. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612458/exclusive-chinese-scientists-are-creating-crispr-babies/
- Robert, J. S. 2006. “The Science and Ethics of Making Part-Human Animals in Stem Cell Biology.” FASEB Journal 20: 838–845. doi:10.1096/fj.05-4286lsf.
- Robert, J. S. 2009. “Toward a Better Bioethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15: 283–291. doi:10.1007/s11948-009-9134-5.
- Stilgoe, J., S. Lock, and J. Wilsdon. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement with Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15. doi:10.1177/0963662513518154.
- Tindana, P., J. de Vries, M. Campbell, K. Littler, J. Seeley, P. Marshall, and J. Troyer, et al. 2015. “Community Engagment Strategies for Genomic Studies in Africa.” A Review Of The Literature.” Bmc Medical Ethics 16 :24. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z.
- Wooden, R. 2006. “The Principles of Public Engagement: At the Nexus of Science, Public Policy Influence, and Citizen Education.” Social Research 73 (3): 1057–1063.
- Yong, E. 2018. “The CRISPR Baby Scandal Gets Worse by the Day.” The Atlantic. December 3. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/12/15-worrying-things-about-crispr-babies-scandal/577234/