Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 26, 2019 - Issue 5
4,710
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Implementation of a responsible conduct of research education program at Duke University School of Medicine

, , , , , , , , , , & show all

References

  • Alberts, B., R. J. Cicerone, S. E. Fienberg, A. Kamb, M. McNutt, R. M. Nerem, R. Schekman, R. Shiffrin, V. Stodden, S. Suresh, et al. 2015. “Self-Correction in Science at Work.” Science 348 (6242): 1420–1422. doi:10.1126/science.aab3847.
  • Antes, A. L., and J. M. DuBois. 2014. “Aligning Objectives and Assessment in Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15 (2): 108–116. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.852.
  • Banks, G. C., S. G. Rogelberg, H. M. Woznyj, R. S. Landis, and D. E. Rupp. 2016. “Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” Journal of Business and Psychology 31 (3): 323–338. doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7.
  • Boughton, S. L., M. K. Kowalczuk, J. J. Meerpohl, E. Wager, and E. C. Moylan. 2018. “Research Integrity and Peer Review-Past Highlights and Future Directions.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 3: 3. doi:10.1186/s41073-018-0047-1.
  • Bouter, L. M., and S. Hendrix. 2017. “Both Whistleblowers and the Scientists They Accuse are Vulnerable and Deserve Protection.” Accountability in Research 24 (6): 359–366. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1327814.
  • Bulger, R. E., and E. Heitman. 2007. “Expanding Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction across the University.” Academic Medicine 82 (9): 876–878. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909.
  • Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI), RCR Basic. Accessed 29 April 2019. https://www.citiprogram.org/https://about.citiprogram.org/en/course/responsible-conduct-of-research-basic/
  • Davidson, T. 2017. Vaccines: History, Science, and Issues, the Story of a Drug. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, an Imprint of ABC-CLIO, LLC.
  • Davies, C. A. 1999. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. London: Routledge.
  • Davis, M. S., M. Riske-Morris, and S. R. Diaz. 2007. “Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files.” Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4): 395–414. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2.
  • DeMets, D. L., T. R. Fleming, G. Geller, and D. F. Ransohoff. 2017. “Institutional Responsibility and the Flawed Genomic Biomarkers at Duke University: A Missed Opportunity for Transparency and Accountability.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (4): 1199–1205. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9844-4.
  • Duke University School of Medicine (DUSoM). 2018. “Facts and Figures.” Accessed 29 April 2019. https://medschool.duke.edu/sites/medschool.duke.edu/files/magazine/index.html#page=2
  • Eassom, H. 2016. “The Costs of Research Misconduct.” Wiley, May 11. Accessed 29 April 2019. https://www.wiley.com/network/researchers/submission-and-navigating-peer-review/the-costs-of-research-misconduct
  • Edwards, M. A., and S. Roy. 2017. “Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition.” Environmental Engineering Science 34 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1089/ees.2016.0223.
  • Erfan, A. 2017. “Confronting Collective Traumas: An Exploration of Therapeutic Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 18 (1): 34–50. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909.
  • Fanelli, D. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data.” PLoS One 4 (5): e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
  • Fang, F. C., J. W. Bennett, and A. Casadevall. 2013. “Males are Overrepresented among Life Science Researchers Committing Scientific Misconduct.” MBio 4 (1): e00640–12. doi:10.1128/mBio.00640-12.
  • Finkel, A. 2019. “To Move Research from Quantity to Quality, Go beyond Good Intentions.” Nature 566 (7744): 297. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00613-z.
  • Freckelton, Ian. 2016. "Scholarly misconduct and the integrity crisis". OUPblog, Oxford University Press’s Academic Insights for the Thinking World, March 1. Accessed 29 April 2019 https://blog.oup.com/2016/03/scholarly-misconduct-law/
  • Galbraith, K. L. 2017. “Life After Research Misconduct.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 12 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1177/1556264616682568.
  • George, S. L. 2016. “Research Misconduct and Data Fraud in Clinical Trials: Prevalence and Causal Factors.” International Journal of Clinical Oncology 21 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3.
  • Gunsalus, C. K., A. R. Marcus, and I. Oransky. 2018. “Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility.” JAMA 319 (13): 1315–1316. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0358.
  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2012. Evolution of Translational Omics: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/13297.
  • John, L. K., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. “Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling.” Psychological Science 23 (5): 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953.
  • Kalichman, M. 2013. “A Brief History of RCR Education.” Accountability in Research 20 (5–6): 380–394. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822260.
  • Kalichman, M. 2014. “A Modest Proposal to Move RCR Education Out of the Classroom and into Research.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15 (2): 93–95. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.866.
  • Kalichman, M. W. 2007. “Responding to Challenges in Educating for the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Academic Medicine 82 (9): 870–875. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe.
  • Marin-Spiotta, E. 2018. “Harassment Should Count as Scientific Misconduct.” Nature 557 (7704): 141. doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05076-2.
  • Michalek, A. M., A. D. Hutson, C. P. Wicher, and D. L. Trump. 2010. “The Costs and Underappreciated Consequences of Research Misconduct: A Case Study.” PLoS Med 7 (8): e1000318. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000318.
  • Mumford, M. D., L. Steele, and L. L. Watts. 2015. “Evaluating Ethics Education Programs: A Multilevel Approach.” Ethics & Behavior 25 (1): 37–60. doi:10.1080/10508422.2014.917417.
  • National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine (NAS). 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21896.
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2009. “Update on the Requirement for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Accessed 29 April 2019. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-10-019.html
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2012. “NIH Policies and Procedures for Promoting Scientific Integrity.” Accessed 29 April 2019. https://www.nih.gov/sites/default/files/about-nih/nih-director/testimonies/nih-policies-procedures-promoting-scientific-integrity-2012.pdf
  • National Science Foundation (NSF). 2009. “Responsible Conduct of Research: NSF’s Implementation of Section 7009 of the America COMPETES Act.” Federal Register 74 (160): 42126–42128. Accessed 29 April 2019 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2009-08-20/html/E9-19930.htm
  • Office of Research Integrity (ORI). “Case Summary: Potti, Anil.” Accessed 29 April 2019. https://ori.hhs.gov/case-summary-potti-anil
  • Olson, L. E. 2014. “Articulating a Role for Program Evaluation in Responsible Conduct of Research Programs.” Accountability in Research 21 (1): 26–33. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.822265.
  • Probst, B. 2015. “The Eye Regards Itself: Benefits and Challenges of Reflexivity in Qualitative Social Work Research.” Social Work Research 39 (1): 37–48. doi:10.1093/swr/svu028.
  • Resnik, D. B. 2019. “Is It Time to Revise the Definition of Research Misconduct?” Accountability in Research 26 (2): 123–137. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1570156.
  • Resnik, D. B., and G. E. Dinse. 2012. “Do U.S. Research Institutions Meet or Exceed Federal Mandates for Instruction in Responsible Conduct of Research? A National Survey.” Academic Medicine 87 (9): 1237–1242. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318260fe5c.
  • Ruby, J., ed. 2016. A Crack in the Mirror. Reflexive Perspectives in Anthropology. Philadelphia: Penn Press.
  • Science News Staff. 2019. “Duke University Settles Research Misconduct Lawsuit for $112.5 Million.” Science. March 25. doi:10.1126/science.aax4600.
  • Steen, R. G. 2011. “Retractions in the Medical Literature: How Many Patients are Put at Risk by Flawed Research?” Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (11): 688–692. doi:10.1136/jme.2011.043133.
  • Stern, A. M., A. Casadevall, R. G. Steen, and F. C. Fang. 2014. “Financial Costs and Personal Consequences of Research Misconduct Resulting in Retracted Publications.” Elife 3: e02956. doi:10.7554/eLife.02956.
  • Titus, S. L., J. A. Wells, and L. J. Rhoades. 2008. “Repairing Research Integrity.” Nature 453 (7198): 980–982. doi:10.1038/453980a.
  • Torrence, B. S., L. L. Watts, T. J. Mulhearn, M. R. Turner, E. M. Todd, M. D. Mumford, and S. Connelly. 2017. “Curricular Approaches in Research Ethics Education: Reflecting on More and Less Effective Practices in Instructional Content.” Accountability in Research 24 (5): 269–296. doi:10.1080/08989621.2016.1276452.
  • Wells, F. O., and M. J. G. Farthing. 2008. Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research. 4th ed. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
  • Zigmond, M. J., and B. A. Fischer. 2014. “Teaching Responsible Conduct Responsibly.” Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15 (2): 83–87. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.874.