Breaking barriers to ethical research: An analysis of the effectiveness of nonhuman animal research approval in Canada

References

• Bill S-203. 2019. “Ending the Captivity of Whales and Dolphins Act.” 1st Session, 42nd Parliament. https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/S-203/royal-assent
   Google Scholar
• Canada. Tri-Agency Council. 2018. “Agreement on the Administration of Agency Grants and Awards by Research Institutions.” http://science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_56B87BE5.html?OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1989. “Ethics of Animal Investigation.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Policies/Ethics_of_animal_investigation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1991. “Categories of Invasiveness in Animal Experiments.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Policies/Categories_of_invasiveness.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1996. “CCAC Guidelines On: Animal Use Protocol Review (1997).” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Guidelines/Protocol_Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2006a. “Manual for Community Representatives.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Assessment/Community_representatives_manual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2006b. “Terms of Reference for Animal Care Committees.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Standards/Policies/Terms_of_reference_for_ACC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2009. “Animal Use Protocol Worksheet.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://3rs.ccac.ca/documents/en/Animal_use_protocol_worksheet.doc
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2010. “ACC 101: Animal Care Committee Responsibilities.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/National_Workshops/2010/Animal_Care_Committee_Responsibilities.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2018. “Instructions for Completion of the CCAC Animal Use Form.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Assessment/AUDF_Instructions.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2019a. “About the Three Rs.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://3rs.ccac.ca
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2019b. “Animal Care and Use Program Review Form Section 3: Animal Use Protocol Forms.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/Documents/Assessment/regular_visit/Section3.doc
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2019c. “Annual Animal Data Reports.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/en/facts-and-legislation/animal-data/annual-animal-data-reports.html
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2019d. “Reduction Alternatives.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://3rs.ccac.ca/en/research/reduction/
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2019e. “Three Rs.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://3rs.ccac.ca/en/about/three-rs.html
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2019f. “Vision, Mission, and Mandate.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://www.ccac.ca/en/about-the-ccac/vision-mission-and-mandate.html
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Council on Animal Care. 2019g. “Where to Do a Three Rs Literature Search.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://3rs.ccac.ca/en/searches-and-animal-index/where-to.html
   Google Scholar
• “Criminal Code.” RSC 1985, c. C-46. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/fulltext.html
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, N., and G. Griffin. 2011. “Scientists’ Views on the Three Rs: Comparison of Canadian and UK Scientists.” ALTEX Proceedings 1 (12): 319–321. http://www.altex.ch/resources/319321_FenwickandGriffin31.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frasch, P. D. 2016. “Gaps in US Animal Welfare Law for Laboratory Animals: Perspectives from an Animal Law Attorney.” ILAR Journal 57 (3): 285–292. doi:10.1093/ilar/ilw016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, J. P., B. N. Gaskill, E. M. Weber, J. Ahloy-Dallaire, and K. R. Pritchett-Corning. 2017. “Introducing Therioepistemology: The Study of How Knowledge Is Gained from Animal Research.” Lab Animal 46 (4): 103. doi:10.1038/laban.1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go3R Semantic Search Engine. 2017. “Wayback Machine Internet Archive.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20170714142859/http://www.gopubmed.org/web/go3r/www/crc/b6285y/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G., and P. Locke. 2016. “Comparison of the Canadian and US Laws, Regulations, Policies, and Systems of Oversight for Animals in Research.” ILAR Journal 57 (3): 271–284. doi:10.1093/ilar/ilw037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. L. 2003. “Scientific Experiments on Animals and Constitutional Principle.” Constitutional Forum/Forum Constitutionnel 12 (3): 69–76. doi:10.21991/C9HW90.
   Google Scholar
• “The Interspecies Database (Interspecies Differences: 3Rs-Centre Utrecht Life Sciences).” Accessed 10 October 2019. https://www.interspeciesinfo.com
   Google Scholar
• Joober, R., N. Schmitz, L. Annable, and P. Boksa. 2012. “Publication Bias: What are the Challenges and Can They Be Overcome?” Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience 37 (3): 149–152. doi:10.1503/jpn.120065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebsch, M., B. Grune, A. Seiler, D. Butzke, M. Oelgeschläger, R. Pirow, S. Adler, C. Riebeling, and A. Luch. 2011. “Alternatives to Animal Testing: Current Status and Future Perspectives.” Archives of Toxicology 85 (8): 841–858. doi:10.1007/s00204-011-0718-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill. 2019. “Standard Operating Procedures.” Accessed 24 July 2019. https://mcgill.ca/research/research/compliance/animals/animal-research-practices/sop
   Google Scholar
• NSERC. 2013. “Schedule 3: Ethical Review of Research Involving Animals.” Accessed 24 July 2019. http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/Policies-Politiques/MOURoles-ProtocolRoles/3-ResearchwithAnimals-RechercheavecAnimaux_eng.asp
   Google Scholar
• PROSPERO (National Institute for Health Research: International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews). Accessed 10 October 2019. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/
   Google Scholar
• RePORT (NIH Database). Accessed 24 July 2019. https://report.nih.gov/index.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Russell, W. M. S., and R. L. Burch. 1959. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, U. G., T. Wächter, B. Grune, A. Doms, M. R. Alvers, H. Spielmann, and M. Schroeder. 2009. “Go3R - Semantic Internet Search Engine for Alternative Methods to Animal Testing.” ALTEX 26 (1): 17–31. doi:10.14573/altex.2009.1.17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuppli, C. A. 2011. “Decisions about the Use of Animals in Research: Ethical Reflection by Animal Ethics Committee Members.” Anthrozoös 24 (4): 409–425. doi:10.2752/175303711X13159027359980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, L., D. Moher, and P. Shekelle. 2012. “Why Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews Makes Sense.” Systematic Review 1: 7. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strech, D., and U. Dirnagl. 2019. “3Rs Missing: Animal Research without Scientific Value Is Unethical.” BMJ Open Science 3 (1): e000048. doi:10.1136/bmjos-2018-000048.
   Google Scholar
• U15. 2019. “Our Impact.” Accessed 24 July 2019. http://u15.ca/our-impact
   Google Scholar