Advanced search
Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 27, 2020 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
365
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Science’s moral economy of repair: Replication and the circulation of reference

Bart PendersDepartment of Health, Ethics & Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2661-9181View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Sarah de RijckeCentre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, The NetherlandsORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4652-0362View further author information
ORCID Icon &
J. Britt HolbrookDepartment of Humanities, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USAORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5804-0692View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 107-113 | Published online: 27 Jan 2020

References

  • Chang, H. 2012. Is Water H2O?: Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Vol. 293. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • De Solla Price, D. J. 1965. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Fanelli, D. 2018. “Opinion: Is Science Really Facing a Reproducibility Crisis, and Do We Need It To?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115: 2628–2631. doi:10.1073/pnas.1708272114.
  • Fleck, L. [1935] 1980. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer Wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  • Harris, R. 2017. Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope, and Wastes Billions. New York: Hachette UK.
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2005. “Why Most Published Research Findings are False.” PLoS Medicine 2 (8): e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2014. “How to Make More Published Research True.” PLoS Medicine 11 (10): e1001747. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1991. “Epistemic Cultures: Forms of Reason in Science.” History of Political Economy 23 (1): 105–122. doi:10.1215/00182702-23-1-105.
  • Kovacs, J. 2017. “Honorary Authorship and Symbolic Violence.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (1): 51–59. doi:10.1007/s11019-016-9722-5.
  • Kuhn, T. S. [1962] 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lash, T. L., L. J. Collin, and M. E. Van Dyke. 2018. “The Replication Crisis in Epidemiology: Snowball, Snow Job, or Winter Solstice?” Current Epidemiology Reports 5 (2): 175–183. doi:10.1007/s40471-018-0148-x.
  • Latour, B. 1999. Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? from Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123.
  • Leonelli, S. 2018. “Rethinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality.” In Including a Symposium on Mary Morgan: Curiosity, Imagination, and Surprise, edited by L. Fiorito, S. Scheall, and C. E. Suprinyak, 129–146, Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Peels, R. 2019. “Replicability and Replication in the Humanities.” Research Integrity & Peer Review 4 (1): 2. doi:10.1186/s41073-018-0060-4.
  • Peels, R., and L. Bouter. 2018. “The Possibility and Desirability of Replication in the Humanities.” Palgrave Communications 4 (1): 95. doi:10.1057/s41599-018-0149-x.
  • Penders, B. 2017. “All for One or One for All? Authorship and the Cross-sectoral Valuation of Credit in Nutrition Science.” Accountability in Research 24 (8): 433–450. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1386565.
  • Penders, B., J. B. Holbrook, and S. de Rijcke. 2019. “Rinse and Repeat: Understanding the Value of Replication across Different Ways of Knowing.” Publications 7 (3): 52. doi:10.3390/publications7030052.
  • Randall, D., and C. Welser. 2018. The Irreproducibility Crisis of Modern Science: Causes, Consequences, and the Road to Reform. New York, NY: National Association of Scholars.
  • Redish, A. D., E. Kummerfeld, R. L. Morris, and A. C. Love. 2018. “Opinion: Reproducibility Failures are Essential to Scientific Inquiry.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (20): 5042–5046. doi:10.1073/pnas.1806370115.
  • Saltelli, A., and S. Funtowicz. 2017. “What Is Science’s Crisis Really About?” Futures 91: 5–11. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010.
  • Saltelli, A., J. Ravetz, and S. Funtowicz. 2016. “Who Will Solve the Crisis in Science.” In Science on the Verge, edited by J. R. Ravetz, S. Funtowicz, and A. Benessia, 1–30.
  • Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Van Gunsteren, H. 1994. Culturen van besturen. Amsterdam: Boom.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.