The norms of authorship credit: Challenging the definition of authorship in The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity

References

• Adams, A. 2009. “Public Involvement in the Ethics of Research Publications?” Optometry and Vision Science 86 (10): 1135–1136. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181be4aad.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• All European Academies (ALLEA). 2017b. “The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity-Revised Edition.” Accessed 11 January 2019. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• All European Academies (ALLEA). 2017a. “ALLEA Publishes Revised Edition of the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.” ALLEA News (blog), March 24. https://www.allea.org/allea-publishes-revised-edition-european-code-conduct-research-integrity/
   Google Scholar
• All European Academies (ALLEA), and European Science Foundation (ESF). 2011. “The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.” Accessed 11 January 2019. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Geophysical Union (AGU). 2006. “Authorship Guidelines.” Accessed 8 June 2019. https://publications.agu.org/files/2012/12/2006EO260009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. 1998. “The Instability of Authorship: Credit and Responsibility in Contemporary Biomedicine.” The FASEB Journal 12 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1096/fasebj.12.1.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. 2003. “Rights or Rewards?” In Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, edited by M. Biagioli and P. Galison, 253–280. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, J., and A. E. Shamoo. 2015. “Rethinking Authorship in the Era of Collaborative Research.” Accountability in Research 22 (5): 267–283. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.968277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton, B. G. 2008. “Figureheads, Ghost-Writers and Pseudonymous Quant Bloggers: The Recent Evolution of Authorship in Science Publishing.” Medical Hypotheses 71 (4): 475–480. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.06.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, L. D. 2005. “Scientific Authorship. Part 2. History, Recurring Issues, Practices, and Guidelines.” Mutation Research 589 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, B. 2001. “Acknowledgment Trends in the Research Literature of Information Science.” Journal of Documentation 57 (3): 427–433. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000007089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 1995. “A Preface to Accountability in the Professions.” Accountability in Research 4 (2): 81–90. doi:10.1080/08989629508573870.
   Google Scholar
• Drenth, P. J. D. 2012. “The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.” In Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment, edited by T. Mayer and N. Steneck. 161–68.  Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation. 2010. Fostering Research Integrity in Europe. Strasbourg: IREG. Accessed 11 January 2019. https://oeawi.at/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/ESF-research-integrity-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fong, E. A., and A. W. Wilhite. 2017. “Authorship and Citation Manipulation in Academic Research.” Plos One 12 (12): e0187394. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgesson, G. 2015. “Scientific Authorship and Intellectual Involvement in the Research: Should They Coincide?” Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2): 171–175. doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9585-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, C. W., C. Brückner, T. Kaiser, A. Mauron, W. Wahli, U. J. Wenzel, and M. Salathé. 2015. “Authorship in Scientific Publications: Analysis and Recommendations.” Swiss Medical Weekly 145: w14108. doi:10.4414/smw.2015.14108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoey, J. 2000. “Who Wrote This Paper Anyway?: The New Vancouver Group Statement Refines the Definition of Authorship.” CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal 163 (6): 716–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M. 2018. “The Definition of Authorship in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.” In PUBMET 2018: Scholarly Publishing In The Context Of Open Science. Zadar, Croatia: University of Zadar. September 20–21. http://pubmet.unizd.hr/pubmet2018/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Hosseini_PUBMET2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M., L. Consoli, H. Zwart, and M. van den Hoven. 2019. “Suggestions to Improve the Comprehensibility of Current Definitions of Scientific Authorship for International Authors.” Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00106-2.
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2019. “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.” Accessed 21 January 2020. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. H. 2003. “Can Authorship Policies Help Prevent Scientific Misconduct? What Role for Scientific Societies?” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 243–256. doi:10.1007/s11948-003-0011-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology (JOOP). 2019. “JOOP Author Guidelines.” Accessed 8 June 2019. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/20448325/homepage/ForAuthors.html
   Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., N. Desrochers, B. Macaluso, P. Mongeon, A. Paul-Hus, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2016. “Contributorship and Division of Labor in Knowledge Production.” Social Studies of Science 46 (3): 417–435. doi:10.1177/0306312716650046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lissoni, F., F. Montobbio, and L. Zirulia. 2013. “Inventorship and Authorship as Attribution Rights: An Enquiry into the Economics of Scientific Credit.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 95 (November): 49–69. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.08.016.
   Google Scholar
• Marušić, A., L. Bošnjak, and A. Jerončić. 2011. “A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines.” Plos One 6 (9): e23477. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez, D. I., and M. Á. Alcaraz. 2015. “Exploring Acknowledgment Practices in English-Medium Astrophysics Research Papers: Implications on Authorship.” Revista De Lenguas Para Fines Específicos 21 (1): 132–159. doi:10.20420/rlfe.2015.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeon, P., E. Smith, B. Joyal, and V. Larivière. 2017. “The Rise of the Middle Author: Investigating Collaboration and Division of Labor in Biomedical Research Using Partial Alphabetical Authorship.” Plos One 12 (9): e0184601. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. 1997. “A Proposal for A New System of Credit Allocation in Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 3: 237–243. doi:10.1007/s11948-997-0023-5.
   Google Scholar
• Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible Conduct of Research. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. 2006. “Fostering Integrity in Research: Definitions, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions.” Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1): 53–74. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, K. 2008. “Authorship: Why Not Just Toss a Coin?” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology 295 (3): C567–75. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00208.2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). 2007. “Authorship Guidelines.” Accessed 11 January 2019.
   Google Scholar