Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 27, 2020 - Issue 3
425
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Survey of equal contributions in biomedical research publications

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Aakhus, E., N. Mitra, E. Lautenbach, and S. Joffe. 2018. “Gender and Byline Placement of Co-first Authors in Clinical and Basic Science Journals with High Impact Factors.” Journal of the American Medical Association 319 (6): 610–611. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18672.
  • Abritis, A., A. McCook, and R. Watch. 2017. “Cash Incentives for Papers Go Global.” Science 357 (6351): 541. doi:10.1126/science.357.6351.541.
  • Academia Stack Exchange. October 8, 2014. “My First Authorship Is Being Turned into Co-first Authorship, What Can I Do?” Accessed August 23 2019. https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29572/my-first-authorship-is-being-turned-into-co-first-authorship-what-can-i-do
  • Agoramoorthy, G. 2017. “Multiple First Authors as Equal Contributors: Is It Ethical?” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2): 625–627. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9794-x.
  • Akhabue, E., and E. Lautenbach. 2010. ““Equal” Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship.” Annals of Epidemiology 20 (11): 868–871. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004.
  • Albert, T., and E. Wager, on behalf of COPE Council. 2003. “How to Handle Authorship Disputes: A Guide for New Researchers.” Version 1. The Cope Report, September. Accessed August 23 2019. https://publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12_0.pdf
  • Broderick, N. A., and A. Casadevall 2019. “Gender Inequalities among Authors Who Contributed Equally.” Elife 8. pii: e36399. doi:10.7554/eLife.36399.
  • Conte, M. L., S. L. Maat, and M. B. Omary. 2013. “Increased Co-first Authorships in Biomedical and Clinical Publications: A Call for Recognition.” FASEB Journal 27 (10): 3902–3904. doi:10.1096/fj.13-235630.
  • Dubnansky, E., and B. E. Omary. 2012. “Acknowledging Joint First Authors of Published Work: The Time Has Come.” Gastroenterology 143: 879–880. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.009.
  • Faulkes, Z. 2018. “Resolving Authorship Disputes by Mediation and Arbitration.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 3: 12. doi:10.1186/s41073-018-0057-z.
  • Hu, X. 2009. “Loads of Special Authorship Functions: Linear Growth in the Percentage of ‘Equal First Authors’ and Corresponding Authors.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11): 2378–2381. doi:10.1002/asi.v60:11.
  • International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2018. “Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.” Accessed August 23 2019. http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
  • Jia, Z., Y. Wu, Y. Tang, W. Ji, W. Li, X. Zhao, H. Li, Q. He, and D. Ruan. 2016. “Equal Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship in Major Spine Journals during a 10-year Period.” European Spine Journal 25 (3): 913–917. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4314-2.
  • Kumar, S. 2018. “Ethical Concerns in the Rise of Co-authorship and Its Role as a Proxy of Research Collaborations.” Publications 6 (37): 1–9. doi:10.3390/publications6030037.
  • Lei, S. Y., Y. P. Dong, W. F. Zhu, and L. J. Li. 2016. “An Emerging Trend of Equal Authorship Credit in Major Public Health Journals.” Springerplus 5 (1): 1083. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2771-7.
  • Li, Z., Y. M. Sun, F. X. Wu, L. Q. Yang, Z. J. Lu, and W. F. Yu. 2013. “Equal Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship in Major Anaesthesia Journals during a 10-yr Period.” PloS One 8 (8): e71430. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071430.
  • Moffatt, B. 2018. “Scientific Authorship, Pluralism, and Practice.” Accountability in Research 25 (4): 199–211. doi:10.1080/08989621.2018.1437347.
  • Mongeon, P., E. Smith, B. Joyal, V. Larivière, and M. A. Andrade-Navarro. 2017. “The Rise of the Middle Author: Investigating Collaboration and Division of Labor in Biomedical Research Using Partial Alphabetical Authorship.” PloS One 12 (9): e0184601. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184601.
  • Moustafa, K. 2016. “Contributorships are Mot ‘Weighable’ to Be Equal.” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 41 (5): 389–390. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2016.03.001.
  • National Institutes of Health. May, 2016. “Guidelines and Policies for the Conduct of Research in the Intramural Research Program at the NIH.” Accessed August 22 2019. https://oir.nih.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/sourcebook/documents/ethical_conduct/guidelines-conduct_research.pdf
  • National Science Foundation. 2015. “Women and Minorities in the S & E Workforce.” Accessed August 22 2019. https://nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and-engineering-labor-force/women-and-minorities-in-the-s-e-workforce
  • Osborne, J. W., and A. Holland. 2009. “What Is Authorship, and What Should It Be? A Survey of Prominent Guidelines for Determining Authorship in Scientific Publications.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 14 (15): 2.
  • Patel, V. M., P. Panzarasa, H. Ashrafian, T. S. Evans, A. Kirresh, N. Sevdalis, A. Darzi, and T. Athanasiou. 2019. “Collaborative Patterns, Authorship Practices and Scientific Success in Biomedical Research: A Network Analysis.” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 112 (6): 245–257. doi:10.1177/0141076819851666.
  • Patience, G. S., F. Galli, P. A. Patience, D. C. Boffito, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2019. “Intellectual Contributions Meriting Authorship: Survey Results from the Top Cited Authors across All Science Categories.” PloS One 14 (1): e0198117. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0198117.
  • Resnik, D. B., A. M. Tyler, J. R. Black, and G. Kissling. 2016. “Authorship Policies of Scientific Journals.” Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (3): 199–202. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103171.
  • Rindfuss, R. R., M. K. Choe, N. O. Tsuya, L. L. Bumpass, and E. Tamaki. 2015. “Do Low Survey Response Rates Bias Results? Evidence from Japan.” Demographic Research 32 (26): 797–828. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.26.
  • Salganik, M. J. 2017. Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Shamoo, A. E., and D. B. Resnik. 2015. Responsible Conduct of Research. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, E. 2017. “A Theoretical Foundation for the Ethical Distribution of Authorship in Multidisciplinary Publications.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journals 27 (3): 371–411. doi:10.1353/ken.2017.0032.
  • Smith, E., and Z. Master. 2017. “Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications.” Accountability in Research 24 (4): 243–267. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567.
  • Smith, E., and B. Williams-Jones. 2012. “Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-author Studies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2): 199–212. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5.
  • Smith, E., B. Williams-Jones, Z. Master, V. Larivière, C. R. Sugimoto, A. Paul-Hus, M. Shi, E. Diller, K. Caudle, and D. B. Resnik. 2019a. “Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.” Science and Engineering Ethics. Published online 4 June 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3.
  • Smith, E., B. Williams-Jones, Z. Master, V. Larivière, C. R. Sugimoto, A. Paul-Hus, M. Shi, and D. B. Resnik. 2019b. “Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics. Published online 4 June 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4.
  • Sullivan, G. M., and A. R. Artino. 2013. “Analyzing and Interpreting Data from Likert-type Scales.” Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5 (4): 541–542. doi:10.4300/JGME-5-4-18.
  • United Nations Educational, Cultural, and Scientific Organization. 2018. “Fact Sheet 51: Women in Science.” Accessed August 22 2019. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs51-women-in-science-2018-en.pdf
  • Wang, F., L. Tang, L. Bo, J. Li, and X. Deng. 2012. “Equal Contributions and Credit Given to Authors in Critical Care Medicine Journals during a 10-yr Period.” Critical Care Medicine 40 (3): 967–969. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f66a.
  • Wislar, J. S., A. Flanagin, P. B. Fontanarosa, and C. D. Deangelis. 2011. “Honorary and Ghost Authorship in High Impact Biomedical Journals: A Cross Sectional Survey.” British Medical Journal 343: d6128. doi:10.1136/bmj.d6128.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.