References
- AMS et al. (Academy of Medical Sciences, BBSRC, MRC, Wellcome Trust). 2015. Reproducibility and Reliability of Biomedical Research: Improving Research Practice, 20. London: Academy of Medical Sciences. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/38189-56531416e2949.pdf
- APRIN (The Association for the Promotion of Research Integrity). 2018. “The Checklist for Investigating Allegations of Research Misconduct.” Gakujutsu No Doukou (Japanese) 23 (12): 80–82. doi:10.5363/tits.23.12_80.
- ASA (American Statistical Association). 2016. “American Statistical Association Releases Statement on Statistical Significance and P-values.” March 7. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/P-ValueStatement.pdf
- Bird, S. J. 2001. “Mentors Advisors and Supervisors: Their Role in Teaching Responsible Research Conduct.” Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (4): 455–468. doi:10.1007/s11948-001-0002-1.
- Collins, F. S., and L. A. Tabak. 2014. “Policy: NIH Plans to Enhance Reproducibility.” Nature 505 (7485): 612–613. January 30. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://www.nature.com/news/1.14586
- Dahlberg, J. E., and N. M. Davidian. 2010. “Scientific Forensics: How the Office of Research Integrity Can Assist Institutional Investigations of Research Misconduct during Oversight Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4): 713–735. doi:10.1007/s11948-010-9208-4.
- Engler, R. L., J. W. Covell, P. J. Friedman, P. S. Kitcher, R. M. Peters. 1987. “Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research.” New England Journal of Medicine 317 (22): 1383–1389. doi:10.1056/NEJM198711263172205.
- Gunsalus, C. K., A. R. Marcus, I. Oransky. 2018. “Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility.” JAMA April 3 319 (13): 1315–1316. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.0358.
- HHS (Department of Health and Human Services). 2005. “Public Health Service Policies on Research Misconduct; Final Rule.” 42 CFR parts 50 and 93, Federal Register, May 17. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/42_cfr_parts_50_and_93_2005.pdf
- HMS (Harvard Medical School, Academic Research and Integrity). 2005. “Principle and Procedures for Dealing with Allegation of Faculty Misconduct.” June 1. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://ari.hms.harvard.edu/sites/g/files/mcu761/files/principles_and_procedures_for_dealing_with_allegations_of_faculty_misconduct.pdf
- IOM and NRC (Institute of Medicine and National Research Council). 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/10430.
- Kuroki, T., and A. Ukawa. 2018. “Repeating Probability of Authors with Retracted Scientific Publications.” Accountability in Research 25 (4): 212–219. doi:10.1080/08989621.2018.1449651.
- MEXT (The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology). 2006. “Guidelines for Responding to Misconduct in Research Activities: Report from the Special Committee on Scientific Misconduct.” The Council for Science and Technology Policy, MEXT. August 8. Accessed 25 February 2020. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/gijyutu/gijyutu12/houkoku/06082316.htm (Japanese).
- MEXT (The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology). 2014. “Guidelines for Responding to Misconduct in Research.” MEXT, August 26. Accessed 25 February 2020. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/26/08/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/08/26/1351568_02_1.pdf (Japanese).
- MHLW (The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare). 2007. “Guidance for Responding to Research Misconduct.” MHLW, April 19. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/hokabunya/kenkyujigyou/k-fusei/index.html (Japanese).
- MHLW (The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare). 2015. “Guidelines for Responding to Research Misconduct in Research in the Health, Labour and Welfare Field.” MHLW, January 16 (amended February 23 2017). Accessed 25 February 2020. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000071398.html (Japanese).
- NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/21896.
- NASEM (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine). 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process: Volume I. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/1864.
- OSU (The Ohio State University). 2008. “University Policies for Procedures Concerning Research Misconduct.” May 29. Accessed 25 February 2020. http://orc.osu.edu/files/Misconduct_Policy.pdf
- SCJ (Science Councile of Japan). 2015. “Promotion of the Integrity of Science.” March 6. Accessed 25 February 2020. http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-23-k150306.pdf (Japanese).
- Science News Staff. 2019. “Duke University Settles Research Misconduct Lawsuit for $112.5 Million.” Science March 25. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/03/duke-university-settles-research-misconduct-lawsuit-1125-million
- Titus, S., J. Wells, and L. Rhoades. 2008. “Repairing Research Integrity.” Nature 453 (7198): 980–982. doi:10.1038/453980a.
- UCSD (University of California San Diego). 2018. “Integrity of Research Policy and Procedures.” October 4. Accessed 25 February 2020. http://adminrecords.ucsd.edu/ppm/docs/100-4.pdf
- UI (University of Illinois). 2009. “Policy and Procedures on Integrity in Research and Publications.” August 28. Accessed 25 February 2020. https://www.vpaa.uillinois.edu/UserFiles/Servers/Server_420372/File/Integrity-Policy.pdf
- VU (Vanderbilt University). 2012. “Policy for Responding in Allegations of Research Misconduct to Research Sponsored by the U.S. Public Health Service.” Accessed 25 February 2020. https://www.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/archive/2012-2013/manage/wp-content/files/VU-Policy-for-Responding-to-Allegations-of-Research-Misconduct.pdf
- Wright, D. E., S. L. Titus, and J. B. Cornelison. 2008. “Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed ORI Cases.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3): 323–336. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9074-5.