Relationship among factors affecting research misconduct in medical sciences in Iran

References

• Abedini, E., A. Naami, and M. Modiri. 2013. “A Study on Ranking Ethical Factors Influencing Customer Loyalty.” Management Science Letters 3: 2597–2602. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2013.09.011.
   Google Scholar
• Anell, L. 2016. “Direction to the Future SWEDISH Research System: Goals and Recommendations.” https://www.vr.se/download/18.2412c5311624176023d254d2/1529480558558/Direction-to-the-Future-Swedish-Research-System_VR_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bahman Abadi, S., T. Javidi Kalateh, and B. Shabani Varaki. 2014. “Observing the Research Ethics in Doctoral Dissertations (Case Study: Department of Human Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad).” Rahbord-e-Farhang 7 (25): 129–152. [ in Persian].
   Google Scholar
• Bakir, S., S. Khan, K. Ahsan, and S. Rahman. 2018. “Exploring the Critical Determinants of Environmentally Oriented Public Procurement Using the DEMATEL Method.” Journal of Environmental Management 225: 325–335. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, K. 2015. “Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Graduate Students’ Experiences of Plagiarism by Their Professors.” PhD diss., University of North Dakota, North Dakota.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, A. 2012. Sociological Inquiry Principles: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. New York: Flat World Knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, X., C. Herna´ndez, R. Pericas, P. Doti, and A. Marusˇic. 2012. “Misconduct Policies in high-Iipact Biomedical Journals.” PLoS ONE 7 (12): e51928. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossham, A. 2017. “An Evaluation of Phenomenography.” Library and Information Research 41 (125): 17–31. doi:10.29173/lirg755.
   Google Scholar
• Couzin-Frankel, J. 2013. “Shaking up Science.” Science 339: 386–389. doi:10.1126/science.339.6118.386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M., M. Riske–Morris, and S. Diaz. 2007. “Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files.” Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4): 395–414. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedasht, G., R. Mohamad Zin, M. S. Ferwati, M. Abdullahi Mu’azu, A. Keyvanfar, and R. McCaffer. 2017. “DEMATEL-ANP Risk Assessment in Oil and Gas Construction Projects.” Sustainability 9 (1420): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, S. 2015. “The Relationship between Ethical Regard and Academic Misconduct among College Students.” PhD diss. http://dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3963&context=etd
   Google Scholar
• Dopfer, K., J. Foster, and J. Potts. 2004. “Micro-meso-macro.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14 (3): 263–279. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0193-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eifert, K. 2014. “The Ugliest Part of the Job: Faculty Perceptions on Addressing Graduated Student Academic Misconduct.” PhD diss., University of South Carolina, Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• European Science Foundation (ESF). 2010. Fostering Research Integrity in Europe: A Report by the ESF Member Organization Forum on Research Integrity. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Falatoonitoosi, E., Z. Leman, S. Sorooshian, and M. Salimi. 2013. “Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory.” Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 5 (13): 3476–3480.
   Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2013. “Redefine Misconduct as Distorted Reporting.” Nature 494: 149. doi:10.1038/494149a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, R. 2015. “Scientific Misconduct: How Organizational Culture Plays Its Part.” Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit 1 (5). doi:10.5553/TCC/221195072015005001003.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, S. L., and S. P. Trotter. 2017. The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. New Jersey: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fierz, K., S. Gennaro, K. Dierickx, T. Achterberg, K. Morin, and S. Geest. 2014. “Scientific Misconduct: Also an Issue in Nursing Science?” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 46 (4): 271–280. doi:10.1111/jnu.12082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2006. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. California: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gall, M. D., W. R. Borg, and J. P. Gall. 1996. Educational Research: An Introduction. 6th ed. New York: Longman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gallant, T. 2011. Creating the Ethical Academy: A Systems Approach to Understanding Misconduct and Empowering Change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• George, S. 2016. “Research Misconduct and Data Fraud in Clinical Trials: Prevalence and Causal Factors.” International Journal of Clinical Oncology 21: 15–21. doi:10.1007/s10147-015-0887-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. 2012. “Rational Choice and Moral Intent in the Responsible Conduct of Research.” PhD diss., Iowa State University, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Habermann, B., B. Broome, E. Proyer, and K. Ziner. 2010. “Research Coordinators Experiences with Scientific Misconduct and Research Integrity.” Nursing Research 59 (1): 51–57. doi:10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181c3b9f2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. Y., P. H. Chung, J. Z. Shyu, Y. H. Ho, C. H. Wu, M. C. Lee, and M. J. Wu. 2018. “Evaluation and Selection of Materials for Particulate Matter MEMS Sensors by Using Hybrid MCDM Methods.” Sustainability 10 (10): 1–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, G., and Z. Zhongjia. 2012. “Analysis of the Critical Influential Factors on Healthy Development of University Academic: Based on DEMATEL Method.” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Innovation & Management, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, B. N., C. Y. Huang, and C. H. Wu. 2016. “A TOE Approach to Establish A Green Supply Chain Adoption Decision Model in the Semiconductor Industry.” Sustainability 8 (168): 1–30. doi:10.3390/su8020168.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali Mahmuei, H. R., S. Asadi, and S. Sedghi. 2012. Assessing Research Effects in Medical Sciences: Patterns and Methods. Tehran: Iranian Academy of Medical Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali, R., S. Ghazinoory, and M. Sadeghi. 2014. “Plagiarism and Ethics of Knowledge: Evidence from International Scientific Papers.” Journal of Information Ethics 23 (1): 101–110. doi:10.3172/JIE.23.1.101.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2002. The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, S., and R. Somvir. 2015. “DEMATEL: A Methodology for Research in Library and Information Science.” International Journal of Librarianship and Administration 6 (2): 179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, P. C., and P. L. Chang. 2007. “A Typology of University Ethical Lapses: Types, Levels of Seriousness, and Originating Location.” Journal of Higher Education 7S: 402–429. doi:10.1353/jhe.2007.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Lacetera, N., and L. Zirulia. 2009. “The Economics of Scientific Misconduct.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 27 (3): 568–603. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewp031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, G. 2011. “The Past, Present, and Future of Scientific Misconduct Research: What Has Been Done? What Needs to Be Done?” Journal of the Professoriate 6 (1): 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, L. W., K. H. Shih, and Y. H. Chung. 2010. “Financing Instruments and Strategies of Agribusiness: Evidence from Taiwan.” African Journal of Business Management 4: 320–332.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. W., S. H. Chen, and G. H. Tzeng. 2009. “Constructing a Cognition Map of Alternative Fuel Vehicles Using the DEMATEL Method.” Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 16: 5–19. doi:10.1002/mcda.438.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S., F. Wells, and M. Farthing. 2001. Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research. London: BM Books.
   Google Scholar
• Louw, Q., K. Grimmer-Somers, and A. Bialocerkowski. 2011. “Research Integrity and Misconduct: First-hand Experiences of Plagiarism and Data Manufacture.” Physiotherapy Research International 16 (2): 63–68. doi:10.1002/pri.511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mardani, A. 2018. “Designing a Model to Identify Factors Affecting the Research Misconduct in Medical Research in Iran.” PhD diss., University of Tehran. [ in Persian].
   Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. 2007. “Universities and the Money Fix.” Nature 449 (7159): 141–142. doi:10.1038/449141a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B., A. Crain, M. Anderson, and R. DeVries. 2009. “Institutions’ Expectations for Researchers’ Self-funding, Federal Grant Holding, and Private Industry Involvement: Manifold Drives of Self-interest and Researcher Behavior.” Academic Medicine 84 (11): 1491–1498. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb2ca6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, E. 2012. “Research Misconduct in National Science Foundation Funded Research a Mixed-methods Analysis of 2007–2011 Research Awards.” PhD diss., North Central University.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., L. D. Devenport, R. P. Brown, S. Connelly, S. T. Murphy, J. H. Hill, and A. L. Antes. 2006. “Validation of Ethical Decision Making Measures: Evidence for a New Set of Measures.” Ethics & Behavior 16 (4): 319–345. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1604_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., and L. Levidow. 2006. Governing the Transatlantic Conflict over Agricultural Biotechnology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nakhaee, N., H. Najafipour, A. Rohani, S. Raftari, M. Mobasher, and F. Hasani. 2010. “Proposing Disciplinary Charter of Research Misconduct: A Qualitative Study.” Strides in Development of Medical Education 7 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nylenna, M., and S. Simonsen. 2006. “Scientific Misconduct: A New Approach to Prevention.” Lancet 367: 1882–1884. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68821-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okonta, P., and T. Rossouw. 2014. “Misconduct in Research: A Descriptive Survey of Attitudes, Perceptions and Associated Factors in A Developing Country.” BMC Medical Ethics 15 (25): 125–139. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, L. 2008. Scientific Misconduct: Perceptions, Belifes, Working Environments, and Reporting Practices in the Clinical Research Associate Population. Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Salamat, F., F. Sobhani, and A. Mallaei. 2013. “Quality of Publication Ethics in the Instructions to the Authors of Iranian Journals of Medical Sciences.” Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences 38 (1): 57–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Si, S. L., X. Y. You, H. C. Liu, and P. Zhang. 2018. “DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-art Literature on Methodologies and Applications.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering Article ID 3696457: 1–33. doi:10.1155/2018/3696457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, R. 2011. “Retractions in the Scientific Literature: Is the Incidence of Research Fraud Increasing?” Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (4): 249–253. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.040923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J., R. Verbeke, and Y. Smulders. 2014. “Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (5): 64–71. doi:10.1177/1556264614552421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng, G. H., C. H. Chiang, and C. W. Li. 2007. “Evaluating Intertwined Effects in e-learning Programs: A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Based on Factor Analysis and DEMATEL.” Expert Systems with Applications 32: 1028–1044. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, P. L., J. H. Huang, G. H. Tzeng, and S. I. Wu. 2010. “Causal Modeling of Web-Advertising Effects by Improving SEM Based on DEMATEL Technique.” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 9 (5): 799–829. doi:10.1142/S0219622010004032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. H., M. C. Shieh, C. Y. Huang, and C. P. Tung. 2018. “A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Successful Integration of Corporate Volunteers into Public Flood Disaster Inquiry and Notification Systems.” Sustainability 10 (1973): 1–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar