Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA

References

• Anderson, M., K. Louis, and J. Earle. 1994. “Disciplinary and Departmental Effects on Observations of Faculty and Graduate Student Misconduct.” Journal of Higher Education 65 (3): 331–350. doi:10.1080/00221546.1994.11778504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerlocher, M., J. O’Brien, M. Newton, T. Gautam, and J. Noble. 2010. “Data Integrity, Reliability and Fraud in Medical Research.” European Journal of Internal Medicine 21 (1): 40–45. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2009.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., and A. Herzberg. 2006. “On the Performance of Maximum Likelihood versus Means and Variance Adjusted Weighted Least Squares Estimation in CFA.” Structural Equation Modeling 13 (2): 186–203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, A., and T. Wagner. 2006. “Self-reported Utilization of Health Care Services: Improving Measurement and Accuracy.” Medical Care Research and Review 63 (2): 217–235. doi:10.1177/1077558705285298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K., P. Biemer, A. Karr, S. Tueller, and M. Berzofsky. 2016. “Are Survey Weights Needed? A Review of Diagnostic Tests in Regression Analysis.” Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 3 (1): 375–392. doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-011516-012958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, X., and J. Ross. 2012. “Ghostwriting: Research Misconduct, Plagiarism, or Fool’s Gold?” The American Journal of Medicine 125 (4): 324–326. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouter, L., J. Tijdink, N. Axelsen, B. Martinson, and G. Ter Riet. 2016. “Ranking Major and Minor Research Misbehaviors: Results from a Survey among Participants of Four World Conferences on Research Integrity.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 1 (1): 17. doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Broome, M., E. Pryor, B. Habermann, L. Pulley, and H. Kincaid. 2005. “The Scientific Misconduct Questionnaire—Revised (SMQ-R): Validation and Psychometric Testing.” Accountability in Research 12 (4): 263–280. doi:10.1080/08989620500440253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, T. 2006. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruton, S. 2014. “Self-plagiarism and Textual Recycling: Legitimate Forms of Research Misconduct.” Accountability in Research 21 (3): 176–197. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.848071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buljan, I., L. Barać, and A. Marušić. 2018. “How Researchers Perceive Research Misconduct in Biomedicine and How They Would Prevent It: A Qualitative Study in a Small Scientific Community.” Accountability in Research 25 (4): 220–238. doi:10.1080/08989621.2018.1463162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattano, V., and J. Turk. 2007. “Fraud and Misconduct in Scientific Research: A Definition and Procedures for Investigation.” Medicine and Law 26 (3): 465–476.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claxton, L. 2005. “Scientific Authorship, Part 2: History, Recurring Issues, Practices, and Guidelines.” Mutation Research 589 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coats, A. 2009. “Ethical Authorship and Publishing.” International Journal of Cardiology 131 (2): 149–150. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M., M. Riske-Morris, and S. Diaz. 2007. “Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files.” Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4): 395–414. doi:10.1007/s11948-007-9045-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, R., M. Anderson, and B. Martinson. 2006. “Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 (1): 43–50. doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D., J. Smyth, and L. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsity Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survey Data.” PLoS One 4 (5): e5738. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F., R. Steen, and A. Casadevall. 2012. “Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (42): 17028–17033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., and N. Schwarz. 2016. “Questionable Research Practices Revisited.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 7 (1): 45–52. doi:10.1177/1948550615612150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gary, P. 2007. “Adjusting for Nonresponse in Surveys.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by J. Smart, 411–449. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Godescharle, S., S. Fieuws, B. Nemery, and K. Dierickx. 2018. “Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey within Industry and Universities.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (6): 1697–1717. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9957-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grants.gov. 2020. “Grant Fraud and Scams.” Accessed 1 April 2020. https://www.grants.gov
   Google Scholar
• Grieneisen, M., and M. Zhang. 2012. “A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature.” PLoS One 7 (10): e44118. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R., and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2): 167–189. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, H. 1962. “Multiple Frame Surveys.” Proceedings of the Social Statistics Section, American Statistical Association 19 (6): 203–206.
   Google Scholar
• Haven, T., J. Tijdink, B. Martinson, and L. Bouter. 2019. “Perceptions of Research Integrity Climate Differ between Academic Ranks and Disciplinary Fields: Results from a Survey among Academic Researchers in Amsterdam.” PLoS One 14 (1): e0210588. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselmann, F., V. Wienefoet, and M. Reinhart. 2014. “Measuring Scientific Misconduct—Lessons from Criminology.” Publications 2 (3): 61–70. doi:10.3390/publications2030061.
   Google Scholar
• Holtfreter, K., M. Reisig, T. Pratt, and R. Mays. 2020. “The Perceived Causes of Research Misconduct among Faculty Members in the Natural, Social, and Applied Sciences.” Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1593352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, C., and G. Hoover. 2019. “What Crisis? Management Researchers’ Experiences with and Views of Scholarly Misconduct.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (5): 1549–1588. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0079-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, L., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. “Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling.” Psychological Science 23 (5): 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J., and L. McCullough. 2015. “Is a Gift Authorship Really a Grift Authorship?” Journal of Vascular Surgery 61 (4): 1092–1093. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, M., M. Sweet, and D. Plemmons. 2015. “Standards of Scientific Conduct: Disciplinary Differences.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5): 1085–1093. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9594-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khade, N., X. Wang, and S. Decker. 2018. “Examining the Link between Childhood Physical Abuse and Risk for Violence Victimization in Youth and Young Adulthood in China.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence: 088626051879400. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0886260518794002.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, P., and S. Lemeshow. 1999. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., and C. Koedel. 2017. “Representation and Salary Gaps by Race-ethnicity and Gender at Selective Public Universities.” Educational Researcher 46 (7): 343–354. doi:10.3102/0013189X17726535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loui, M. 2002. “Seven Ways to Plagiarize: Handling Real Allegations of Research Misconduct.” Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (4): 529–539. doi:10.1007/s11948-002-0005-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B., M. Anderson, and R. De Vries. 2005. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 435 (9): 735–737. doi:10.1038/435737a.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomerie, B., and T. Birkhead. 2005. “A Beginner’s Guide to Scientific Misconduct.” ISBE Newsletter 17 (1): 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Moskovitz, C. 2019. “Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (3): 813–851. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0060-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakashima, E. 2016. “Russian Government Hackers Penetrated DNC, Stole Opposition Research on Trump.” The New York Times, June 14. http://www.nytimes.com
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2018. “Digest of Education Statistics, Table 315.20.” Accessed 25 August 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d18/tables/dt18_315.20.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2019. “Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. Use the Data.” Accessed 25 August 2019. https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data
   Google Scholar
• Office of Research Integrity. 2019. “Definition of Research Misconduct.” Accessed 9 July 2019. https://ori.hhs.gov
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, B., J. Lombardi, C. Abbey, and D. Craig. 2013. The Top American Research Universities: 2013 Annual Report. Tempe, AZ: Center for Measuring University Performance.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, T., M. Reisig, K. Holtfreter, and K. Golladay. 2019. “Scholars’ Preferred Solutions for Research Misconduct: Results from a Survey of Faculty Members at America’s Top 100 Research Universities.” Ethics and Behavior 29 (7): 510–530. doi:10.1080/10508422.2019.1612748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, E., B. Habermann, and M. Broome. 2007. “Scientific Misconduct from the Perspective of Research Coordinators: A National Survey.” Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6): 365–369. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.016394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pupovac, V., and D. Fanelli. 2015. “Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5): 1331–1352. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranstam, J., M. Buyse, S. George, S. Evans, N. Geller, B. Scherrer, E. Lesaffre, G. Murray, L. Edler, J. Hutton, et al. 2000. “Fraud in Medical Research: An International Survey of Biostatisticians.” Controlled Clinical Trials 21 (5): 415–427. doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(00)00069-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, L. 1999. “Salami Slicing, Shotgunning, and the Ethics of Authorship.” American Journal of Roentgenology 173 (2): 265. doi:10.2214/ajr.173.2.10430115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrich, R., and D. Sullivan. 2009. “Plagiarism and Dual Publication: Review of the Issues and Policy Statement.” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 124 (4): 1333–1339. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181b59d42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Science News Staff. 2018. “Trump, Congress Approve Largest U.S. Research Spending Increase in a Decade.” Science, March 23. Accessed 30 July 2019. https://www.sciencemag.org
   Google Scholar
• Sebo, P., H. Maisonneuve, B. Cerutti, J. Fournier, N. Senn, and D. Haller. 2017. “Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners’ Responses to A Postal versus Web-based Survey: A Randomized Trial.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 19 (3): e83. doi:10.2196/jmir.6308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., B. Williams-Jones, Z. Master, V. Lariviére, C. Sugimoto, A. Paul-Hus, M. Shi, E. Diller, K. Caudle, and D. Resnik. 2019. “Researchers’ Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams.” Science and Engineering Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00113-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, R. 2011. “Retractions in the Scientific Literature: Do Authors Deliberately Commit Research Fraud?” Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2): 113–117. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.038125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeria da Silva, J., and J. Dobránski. 2016. “Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5): 1457–1472. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink, J., R. Verbeke, and Y. Smulders. 2014. “Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9 (5): 64–71. doi:10.1177/1556264614552421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. 2018. “Ghost Authorship Haunts Industry-funded Clinical Trials.” Nature, October 9. Accessed 6 April 2018. https://www.nature.com
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, S. 2015. “Low Self-control, Gender, Race, and Offending in Late Life.” Psychology, Crime and Law 21 (5): 426–451. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2014.989169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D., S. Titus, and J. Cornelison. 2008. “Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed ORI Cases.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3): 323–336. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9074-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar