A qualitative study of Equal Co-First Authorship

References

• Aakhus, E., N. Mitra, E. Lautenbach, and S. Joffe. 2018. “Gender and Byline Placement of Co-first Authors in Clinical and Basic Science Journals with High Impact Factors.” Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 319 (6): 610–611. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. 2020. “Stress, Anxiety, Harassment: Huge Survey Reveals Pressures of Scientists’ Lives.” Nature 577 (7791): 460–461. doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00101-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, A., D. Cyranoski, N. Jones, B. Maher, Q. Schiermeier, and R. Van Noorden. 2010. “Do Metrics Matter?” Nature 465 (7300): 860–862. doi:10.1038/465860a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agoramoorthy, G. 2017. “Multiple First Authors as Equal Contributors: Is It Ethical?” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (2): 625–627. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9794-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhabue, E., and E. Lautenbach. 2010. “‘Equal’ Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship.” Annals of Epidemiology 20 (11): 868–871. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., F. C. Kot, M. A. Shaw, C. C. Lepkowski, and R. G. De Vries. 2011. “Authorship Diplomacy: Cross-national Differences Complicate Allocation of Credit and Responsibility.” American Scientist 99 (3): 204. doi:10.1511/2011.90.204.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, D. D., and R. Rosen. 1978. “Studies in Scientific Collaboration Part I. The Professional Origins of Scientific Co-authorship.” Scientometrics 1 (1): 65–84. doi:10.1007/BF02016840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, D. D., and R. Rosen. 1979. “Studies in Scientific Collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the Natural History of Modern Scientific Co-authorship.” Scientometrics 1 (3): 231–245. doi:10.1007/BF02016308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M., and A. Lippman. 2020. Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordens, M., and I. Gomez. 2000. “Collaboration Networks in Science.” In The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugen Garfield, edited by B. Cronin and H. B. Atkins, 197–213. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, J., and A. E. Shamoo. 2015. “Rethinking Authorship in the Era of Collaborative Research.” Accountability in Research 22 (5): 267–283. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.968277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulbes, D. R., T. Costello, K. Baggerly, F. Fan, R. Wang, R. Bhattacharya, X. Ye, and L. M. Ellis. 2018. “A Survey on Data Reproducibility and the Effect of Publication Process on the Ethical Reporting of Laboratory Research.” Clinical Cancer Research 24 (14): 3447–3455. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and J. Youtie. 2017. The Strength in Numbers: The New Science of Team Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, N. A., and A. Casadevall. 2019. “Gender Inequalities among Authors Who Contributed Equally.” eLife 8: e36399. doi:10.7554/eLife.36399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappell, M. S. 2016. “Equal Authorship for Equal Authors: Personal Experience as an Equal Author in Twenty Peer-reviewed Medical Publications during the Last Three Years.” Journal of the Medical Library Association 104 (4): 363–364. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte, M. L., S. L. Maat, and M. B. Omary. 2013. “Increased Co-first Authorships in Biomedical and Clinical Publications: A Call for Recognition.” FASEB Journal 27 (1): 3902–3904. doi:10.1096/fj.13-235630.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cormode, G., S. Muthukrishnan, and J. Yan. 2013. “First Author Advantage: Citation Labeling in Research.” In Compsci13: Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. San Francisco, CA. October 13–18. doi:10.1145/2508497.2508500.
   Google Scholar
• Drubin, D. G. 2014. “MBoC Improves Recognition of Co-first Authors.” Molecular Biology of the Cell 25 (13): 1937. doi:10.1091/mbc.E14-05-0954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drug Monkey. 2012. “Co-first Authorship Is a Lie and a Sham and an Embarrassment to Our Profession.” Drug Monkey: Grants Research and Drugs (blog), February 28. Accessed 14 April 2020. https://drugmonkey.scientopia.org/2012/02/28/co-first-authorship-is-a-lie-and-a-sham-and-an-embarassment-to-our-profession/
   Google Scholar
• Dubnansky, E., and M. B. Omary. 2012. “Acknowledging Joint First Authors of Published Work: The Time Has Come.” Gastroenterology 143 (4): 879–880. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., and S. Roy. 2017. “Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition.” Environmental Engineering Science 34 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1089/ees.2016.0223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo, S., and H. Kyngäs. 2008. “The Qualitative Content Analysis Process.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1): 107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, M., W. A. Williams, D. M. Goodman, and L. F. Ross. 2017. “Gender Differences in Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001–2016.” Journal of Pediatrics 191: 244–249. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontanarosa, P., H. Bauchner, and A. Flanagin. 2017. “Authorship and Team Science.” Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 318 (24): 2433–2437. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.19341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habibzadeh, F., and H. Marcovitch. 2012. “Authorship Dispute among the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.” European Science Editing 38 (2): 40–41.
   Google Scholar
• Heinemann, M. K., and F. Beyersdorf. 2016. “Two Minds with but a Single Thought.” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 49 (6): 1543–1544. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezw137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann, M. K., G. Brumfield, A. Boening, and B. Niemann. 2019. “‘More Equal than Others? An Annoying Habit.’ (Poster Presentation).” In WCRI 2019: World Conference on Research Integrity. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong (HKU). June 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M. 2020. “Equal Co-authorship Practices: Review and Recommendations.” Science and Engineering Ethics (Online first). doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00183-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X. 2009. “Loads of Special Authorship Functions: Linear Growth in the Percentage of “Equal First Authors” and Corresponding Authors.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (11): 2378–2381. doi:10.1002/asi.21164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, M., H. Hsieh, and C. Lin. 2016. “The Co-first and Co-corresponding Author Phenomenon in the Pharmacy and Anesthesia Journals.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 53 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301138.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, Z., Y. Wu, Y. Tang, W. Ji, W. Li, X. Zhao, H. Li, Q. He, and D. Ruan. 2016. “Equal Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship in Major Spine Journals during a 10-year Period.” European Spine Journal 25 (3): 913–917. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4314-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, W., and S. de Rijcke. 2017. “Quantifying ‘Output’ for Evaluation; Administrative Knowledge Politics and Changing Epistemic Cultures in Dutch Law Faculties.” Science and Public Policy 44 (2): 284–293. doi:10.1093/scipol/scw064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolata, G. 2016. “So Many Research Scientists, so Few Openings as Professors.” The New York Times (News), July 14. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/upshot/so-many-research-scientists-so-few-openings-as-professors.html
   Google Scholar
• Kornhaber, R. A., L. M. McLean, and R. J. Baber. 2015. “Ongoing Ethical Issues Concerning Authorship in Biomedical Journals: An Integrative Review.” International Journal of Nanomedicine 10: 4837–4846. doi:10.2147/IJN.S87585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. 2018. “Ethical Concerns in the Rise of Co-authorship and Its Role as a Proxy of Research Collaborations.” Publications 6 (3): 37. doi:10.3390/publications6030037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., N. Desrochers, B. Macaluso, P. Mongeon, A. Paul-Hus, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2016. “Contributorship and Division of Labor in Knowledge Production.” Social Studies of Science 46 (30): 417–435. doi:10.1177/0306312716650046.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larivière, V., Y. Gringas, C. R. Sugimoto, and A. Tsou. 2015. “Team Size Matters: Collaboration and Scientific Impact since 1900.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (7): 1323–1332. doi:10.1002/asi.23266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, S., Y. Dong, W. Zhu, and L. Li. 2016. “An Emerging Trend of Equal Authorship Credit in Major Public Health Journals.” SpringerPlus 5 (1): 1083. doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2771-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, Y., Y. Liu, and M. G. B. Drew. 2020. “Clarifications of Concepts Concerning Interplanar Spacing in Crystals with Reference to Recent Publications.” SN Applied Sciences 2 (4): 755. doi:10.1007/s42452-020-2498-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. 2017. “The Ethics of Multiple Authorship: Power, Performativity and the Gift Economy.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (7): 1194–1210. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1085009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt, M., M. Bradford, J. M. Drazen, B. Hanson, B. Howard, K. H. Jamieson, V. Kiermer, E. Marcus, B. K. Pope, R. Schekman, et al. 2018. “Transparency in Authors’ Contributions and Responsibilities to Promote Integrity in Scientific Publication.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (11): 2557–2580. doi:10.1073/pnas.1715374115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustafa, K. 2016. “Contributorships are Not ‘Weighable’ to Be Equal.” Trends in Biochemical Sciences 41 (5): 389–390. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2016.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, J. Z. 2018. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, R. 2012. “Collaborating in Life Science Research Groups: The Question of Authorship.” Higher Education Policy I25 (3): 289–311. doi:10.1057/hep.2012.11.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). 2019. “High Impact Journals.” NIH (Website). Accessed 21 December 2019. https://tools.niehs.nih.gov/srp/publications/highimpactjournals.cfm
   Google Scholar
• The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. “Editorial Policies.” Accessed 5 April 2020. https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/editorial-policies
   Google Scholar
• Omary, M. B., M. B. Wallace, E. M. El-Omar, R. Jalan, and M. H. Nathanson. 2015. “A Multi-journal Partnership to Highlight Joint First-authors of Manuscripts.” Gut 64 (2): 189. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osório, A. 2018. “On the Impossibility of a Perfect Counting Method to Allocate the Credits of Multi-authored Publications.” Scientometrics 116 (3): 2161–2173. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2815-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penders, B. 2017. “All for One or One for All? Authorship and the Cross-sectoral Valuation of Credit in Nutrition Science.” Accountability in Research 24 (8): 433–450. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1386565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, D. D. S. 1981. “Multiple Authorship.” Science 212 (4498): 986. doi:10.1126/science.212.4498.986-a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., E. Smith, Z. Master, and M. Shin. 2020. “Survey of Equal Contributions in Biomedical Research Publications.” Accountability in Research 27 (3): 115–137. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1722947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., A. M. Tyler, J. R. Black, and G. Kissling. 2016. “Authorship Policies of Scientific Journals.” Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (3): 199–202. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-103171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, M., M. Cattaneo, M. Meoli, and P. Malighetti. 2019. “Self-citations as Strategic Response to the Use of Metrics for Career Decisions.” Research Policy 48 (2): 478–491. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. 2013. “Scientific Genius Is Extinct.” Nature 493 (7434): 602. doi:10.1038/493602a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and Z. Master. 2017. “Best Practice to Order Authors in Multi/interdisciplinary Health Sciences Research Publications.” Accountability in Research 24 (4): 243–267. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1287567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1997. “Authorship: Time for a Paradigm Shift?” BMJ: British Medical Journal 314 (7086): 992. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7086.992.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. 2012. How Economics Shapes Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Noorden, R. 2010. “Metrics: A Profusion of Measures.” Nature 465 (7300): 864–866. doi:10.1038/465864a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. L., L. Sykes, B. R. Hemmelgarn, and H. Quan. 2010. “Authors’ Opinions on Publication in Relation to Annual Performance Assessment.” BMC Medical Education 10 (1): 21. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., L. Tang, L. Bo, J. Li, and X. Deng. 2012. “Equal Contributions and Credit Given to Authors in Critical Care Medicine Journals during a 10-yr Period.” Critical Care Medicine 40 (3): 967–969. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236f66a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. “The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge.” Science 316 (5827): 1036–1039. doi:10.1126/science.1136099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar