References
- Arksey, H., and L. O’Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (1): 19–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
- Audisio, R. A., R. A. Stahel, M. S. Aapro, A. Costa, M. Pandey, and N. Pavlidis. 2009. “Successful Publishing: How to Get Your Paper Accepted.” Surgical Oncology 18 (4): 350–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2008.09.001.
- Barron, J. P. 2006. “CHEST Medical Writing Tips.” Chest 129 (4): 1098–1099. doi:https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.4.1098.
- Björk, B.-C. 2019. “Acceptance Rates of Scholarly Peer-reviewed Journals: A Literature Survey.” El profesional de la información.
- Bordage, G. 2001. “Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports.” Academic Medicine 76 (9): 889–896. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200109000-00010.
- Bornmann, L., I. Nast, and H. D. Daniel. 2008. “Do Editors and Referees Look for Signs of Scientific Misconduct When Reviewing Manuscripts? A Quantitative Content Analysis of Studies that Examined Review Criteria and Reasons for Accepting and Rejecting Manuscripts for Publication.” Scientometrics 77 (3): 415–432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1950-2.
- Browne, R. F. J., P. M. Logan, M. J. Lee, and W. C. Torreggiani. 2004. “The Accuracy of References in Manuscripts Submitted for Publication.” Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal = Journal l’Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes 55 (3): 170–173.
- Byrne, D. W. 2000. “Common Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers.” Science Editor 23 (2): 39–44.
- Celik, E., N. Gedik, G. Karaman, T. Demirel, and Y. Goktas. 2014. “Mistakes Encountered in Manuscripts on Education and Their Effects on Journal Rejections.” Scientometrics 98 (3): 1837–1853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1137-y.
- Chaitow, S. 2019. “The Life-cycle of Your Manuscript: From Submission to Publication.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 23 (4): 683–689. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2019.09.007.
- Coudounaris, D. N. 2019. “Pitfalls in Writing a Good Paper in International Business and Export Marketing: The Case of International Journal of Export Marketing.” International Journal of Export Marketing 3 (2): 146–169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEXPORTM.2019.104398.
- Council, N. R. 2011. Research Training in the Biomedical, Behavioral, and Clinical Research Sciences.
- Da Silva, J. A. T., A. Al-Khatib, V. Katavić, and H. Bornemann-Cimenti. 2018. “Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4): 1347–1365. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9921-3.
- Ehara, S., and K. Takahashi. 2007. “Reasons for Rejection of Manuscripts Submitted to AJR by International Authors.” American Journal of Roentgenology 188 (2): W113–W6. doi:https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.0448.
- Elsevier, S. 2020. Scopus Content Coverage Guide.
- Ezeala, C., I. Nweke, and M. Ezeala. 2013. “Common Errors in Manuscripts Submitted to Medical Science Journals.” Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research 3 (3): 376–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.117957.
- Fahed, R., M. Shamy, and D. Dowlatshahi. 2020. ““It’s about How Hard You Can Get Hit and Keep Moving Forward” How to Survive Rejection and Get Your Research Published.” Stroke 51 (5): e74–e7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028857.
- Farjo, N., D. L. Turpin, R. Y. Coley, and J. Feng. 2015. “Characteristics and Fate of Orthodontic Articles Submitted for Publication: An Exploratory Study of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 147 (6): 680–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.020.
- Glantz, S. A. 1980. “Biostatistics: How to Detect, Correct and Prevent Errors in the Medical Literature.” Circulation 61 (1): 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.61.1.1.
- Harris, A., R. Reeder, and J. Hyun. 2011. “Survey of Editors and Reviewers of High-impact Psychology Journals: Statistical and Research Design Problems in Submitted Manuscripts.” The Journal of Psychology 145 (3): 195–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2011.555431.
- Harris, A. H. S., R. Reeder, and J. K. Hyun. 2009. “Common Statistical and Research Design Problems in Manuscripts Submitted to High-impact Psychiatry Journals: What Editors and Reviewers Want Authors to Know.” Journal of Psychiatric Research 43 (15): 1231–1234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.04.007.
- Hesterman, C. M., C. L. Szperka, and D. P. Turner. 2017. “Reasons for Manuscript Rejection after Peer Review from the Journal Headache.” Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain 58 (10): 1511–1518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13343.
- Johnson, R., A. Watkinson, and M. Mabe. 2018. “The STM Report.” In An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing. 5th Edition October.
- Kang, H. 2013. “The Prevention and Handling of the Missing Data.” Korean Journal of Anesthesiology 64 (5): 402. doi:https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2013.64.5.402.
- Khadilkar, S. S. 2018. Rejection Blues: Why Do Research Papers Get Rejected? Springer.
- McKercher, B., R. Law, K. Weber, H. Song, and C. Hsu. 2007. “Why Referees Reject Manuscripts.” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 31 (4): 455–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348007302355.
- Mungra, P., and P. Webber. 2010. “Peer Review Process in Medical Research Publications: Language and Content Comments.” English for Specific Purposes 29 (1): 43–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.07.002.
- Pierson, D. J. 2004. “The Top 10 Reasons Why Manuscripts are Not Accepted Publication.” Respiratory Care 49 (10): 1246–1252.
- Şanlı, Ö., S. Erdem, and T. Tefik. 2013. “How to Write a Discussion Section?” Türk Üroloji Dergisi/Turkish Journal of Urology 39 (Suppl 1): 20. doi:https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2013.049.
- “ScholarOne.“ https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/scholarone/
- Sollaci, L. B., and M. G. Pereira. 2004. “The Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD) Structure: A Fifty-year Survey.” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 92 (3): 364–367.
- Tharirian, M. H., and E. Sadri. 2013. “Peer Reviewers’ Comments on Research Articles Submitted by Iranian Researchers.” Journal of Teaching Language Skills 32 (3): 107–123.
- Tricco, A. C., E. Lillie, W. Zarin, K. K. O’Brien, H. Colquhoun, D. Levac, D. Moher, M. D. J. Peters, T. Horsley, and L. Weeks. 2018. “PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-scr): Checklist and Explanation.” Annals of Internal Medicine 169 (7): 467–473. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
- Turcotte, C., P. Drolet, and M. Girard. 2004. “Study Design, Originality and Overall Consistency Influence Acceptance or Rejection of Manuscripts Submitted to the Journal.” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 51 (6): 549–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018396.
- Van Lent, M., J. IntHout, and H. J. Out. 2015. “Peer Review Comments on Drug Trials Submitted to Medical Journals Differ Depending on Sponsorship, Results and Acceptance: A Retrospective Cohort Study.” BMJ Open 5 (9): e007961. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007961.
- Venkatesh, S., M. B. Maymone, and N. A. Vashi. 2018. “Peer Reviews: The Dreaded Rejection.” Dermatology Online journal 24 (3): 3.
- Wyness, T., C. McGhee, and D. V. Patel. 2009. “Manuscript Rejection in Ophthalmology and Visual Science Journals: Identifying and Avoiding the Common Pitfalls.” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 37 (9): 864–867. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2009.02190.x.