The common sense behind clinical trial names: An empirical study of trial acronyms

References

• Arpan, L. M. 2020. “Attitude‐to‐Behavior Process Model.” The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., S. Chaiken, R. Govender, and F. Pratto. 1992. “The Generality of the Automatic Attitude Activation Effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (6): 893. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkwits, M. 2000. “Capture! Shock! Excite! Clinical Trial Acronyms and the “Branding” of Clinical Research.” Annals of Internal Medicine 133 (9): 755–759. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-9-200011070-00039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, L. 2013. “TAC: AOITROMJA?(the Acronym Conundrum: Advancing or Impeding the Readability of Medical Journal Articles?).” Radiology 266 (2): 383–387. doi:10.1148/radiol.12121776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomze, D., Asher, N., Ali, O. H., Flatz, L., Azoulay, D., Markel, G., & Meirson, T. (2020). Survival-inferred fragility index of phase 3 clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint Inhibitors. JAMA network open, 3(10), e2017675–e2017675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. O. 1994. “Acronyms of Clinical Trials in Cardiology—1994.” American Journal of Cardiology 74 (1): 79–94. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(94)90500-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. O. 2003. “ATLAS: Another Negative Trial with a Positive-sounding Acronym.” Circulation 108 (13): e98–e98. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000092034.82750.D3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. O. 2007. “Should Clinical Investigators invEnt acroNyms that are CoercivE?—The SCIENCE in Medicine Study.” International Journal of Cardiology 120 (3): 426. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.08.080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, T. O., and D. Julian. 2003. “Acronyms of Cardiologic Trials—2002.” International Journal of Cardiology 91 (2–3): 261–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosmopolitan. 2020. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/
   Google Scholar
• Cosmopolitan. “Best Women’s Perfumes You’re Guaranteed to Fall in Love with at First Spritz.” Accessed March, 2020. https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/beauty-hair/g12464323/womens-perfume/
   Google Scholar
• Dal-Ré, R. 2016. “Are the Most Prestigious Medical Journals Transparent Enough?” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 37 (9): 731–733. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2016.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallowfield, L., and V. Jenkins. 2002. “Acronymic Trials: The Good, the Bad, and the Coercive.” The Lancet 360 (9346): 1622. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11653-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., D. M. Sanbonmatsu, M. C. Powell, and F. R. Kardes. 1986. “On the Automatic Activation of Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 229. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flentje, M., Huber, R.M., Engel-Riedel, W., Andreas, S., Kollmeier, J., Staar, S., Dickgreber, N., Vaissiere, N., De Almeida, C., Edlich, B. and Fietkau, R., 2016. GILT—A randomised phase III study of oral vinorelbine and cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy followed by either consolidation therapy with oral vinorelbine and cisplatin or best supportive care alone in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 192(4), pp.216–222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. 1986. “Advertising and Structuralism the Myth of Formality.” International Journal of Advertising 5 (3): 197–214. doi:10.1080/02650487.1986.11106971.
   Google Scholar
• Fred, H. L., and T. O. Cheng. 2003. “Acronymesis: The Exploding Misuse of Acronyms.” Texas Heart Institute Journal 30 (4): 255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germany, Zone) -U. 1949. Trials of War Criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Nuremberg, October 1946-April, 1949: Case 11: US V. Von Weizsaecker (Ministries Case). Vol. 14. US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, B., and D. Bloom. 2000. “Acronyms, Abbreviations and Initialisms.”
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, D. L., and F. Brunger. 2014. “Ethics,“vulnerability,” and Feminist Participatory Action Research with a Disability Community.” Qualitative Health Research 24 (7): 997–1005. doi:10.1177/1049732314538122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henke, J., S. Joeckel, and L. Dogruel. 2018. “Processing Privacy Information and Decision-making for Smartphone Apps among Young German Smartphone Users.” Behaviour & Information Technology 37 (5): 488–501. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1458902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschtick, R. 2008. “Extremities.” JAMA 300 (10): 1125–1126. doi:10.1001/jama.300.10.1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• inStyle. 2020. https://www.instyle.com/
   Google Scholar
• Isles, A. F., and J. H. Pearn. 2014. “Acronyms Confuse Everyone: Combating the Use of Acronyms to Describe Paediatric Research Studies.” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 50 (10): 756. doi:10.1111/jpc.12603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josephs, K.A., Mackenzie, I., Frosch, M.P., Bigio, E.H., Neumann, M., Arai, T., Dugger, B.N., Ghetti, B., Grossman, M., Hasegawa, M. and Herrup, K., 2019. Erratum: LATE to the PART-y (Brain (2019) 142 (e47. Brain, 142(12), p.E73
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinaki, F., and P. Lunt. 1999. “The Effect of Advertising Message Involvement on Brand Attitude Accessibility.” Journal of Economic Psychology 20 (1): 41–51. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00042-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T. 2019. “Abbreviations: Expectations, Permutations, Revelations, Reservations, and Applications of Shortened Words and Phrases.” AMWA Journal: American Medical Writers Association Journal 34: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Nandal, A. H., and M. Singla. 2019. “Investigating the Impact of Metaphors on Citizens’ Adoption of E-governance in Developing Countries.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 13: 34–61.
   Google Scholar
• Nuremberg Code. 1949. “Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. Washington, D.C.: U.S.” Government Printing Office. Available at.http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html
   Google Scholar
• O’Brate, A., M. Taron, D. Gandara, and R. Rosell. 2000. “Sharing New Approaches to Translational Research in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.” The Oncologist 5 (6): 514–519. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.5-6-514.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orlowski, J. P., and J. A. Christensen. 2002. “The Potentially Coercive Nature of Some Clinical Research Trial Acronyms.” Chest 121 (6): 2023–2028. doi:10.1378/chest.121.6.2023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portier, C., and D. Hoel. 1984. “Type 1 Error of Trend Tests in Proportions and the Design of Cancer Screens.” Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 13 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/03610928408828657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottegård, A., Haastrup, M.B., Stage, T.B., Hansen, M.R., Larsen, K.S., Meegaard, P.M., Meegaard, L.H.V., Horneberg, H., Gils, C., Dideriksen, D. and Aagaard, L., 2014. SearCh for humourIstic and Extravagant acroNyms and Thoroughly Inappropriate names For Important Clinical trials (SCIENTIFIC): qualitative and quantitative systematic study. Bmj, 349
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, California: sage.
   Google Scholar
• Simple, R. 2020. https://www.realsimple.com/
   Google Scholar
• Stanbrook, M. B., P. C. Austin, and D. A. Redelmeier. 2006. “Acronym-named Randomized Trials in Medicine—the ART in Medicine Study.” New England Journal of Medicine 355 (1): 101–102. doi:10.1056/NEJMc053420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S., T. G. Hislop, M. Kuo, and E.-A. Armstrong. 2006. “Hope and Probability: Patient Perspectives of the Meaning of Numerical Information in Cancer Communication.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (3): 318–336. doi:10.1177/1049732305285341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufman, A., Borgmeier, A., Belka, C., Ulm, K., Tian, F., Flentje, M., Schnabel, P., Goldmann, T. and Huber, R.M., 2014. Individualisation of radiochemotherapy (RTCT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pneumologie, 68(06), p.A61
   Google Scholar
• Von Elm, E., Altman, D.G., Egger, M., Pocock, S.J., Gøtzsche, P.C., Vandenbroucke, J.P. and Strobe Initiative, 2014. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. International journal of surgery, 12(12), pp.1495–1499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorlat, E., 1985. Metaphors and their aptness in trade names for perfumes. The ubiquity of metaphor: Metaphor in language and thought, pp.261–291
   Google Scholar
• Washington, H. A. 2016. “Limning the Semantic Frontier of Informed Consent.” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 44 (3): 381–393. doi:10.1177/1073110516667936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weale, J., R. Soysa, and S. Yentis. 2018. “Use of Acronyms in Anaesthetic and Associated Investigations: Appropriate or Unnecessary?–the UOAIAAAIAOU Study.” Anaesthesia 73 (12): 1531–1534. doi:10.1111/anae.14450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakob, F. 2015. Paid Attention: Innovative Advertising for a Digital World. London, United Kingdom: Kogan Page Publishers.
   Google Scholar