A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction

References

• Andersen, L. E., and K. Brad Wray. 2019. “Detecting Errors that Result in Retractions.” Social Studies of Science 49 (6): 942–954. doi:10.1177/0306312719872008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., J. L. Furman, J. L. Krieger, and F. Murray. 2015. “Retractions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 97 (5): 1118–1136. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Ilan, J., and G. Halevi. 2018. “Temporal Characteristics of Retracted Articles.” Scientometrics 116 (3): 1771–1783. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2802-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. 1994. Constructing Experience. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., and P. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., and T. N. Huckin. 2016. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/culture/power. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bilbrey, E., N. O’Dell, and J. Creamer. 2014. “A Novel Rubric for Rating the Quality of Retraction Notices.” Publications 2 (1): 14–26. doi:10.3390/publications2010014.
   Google Scholar
• Brainard, J., J. You, and D. Bonazzi. 2018. “Rethinking Retractions: The Largest-ever Database of Retracted Articles Suggests the Burgeoning Numbers Reflect Better Oversight, Not a Crisis in Science.” Science 362 (6413): 390–393. doi:10.1126/science.362.6413.390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretag, T. 2016. Handbook of Academic Integrity. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, J. M., A. Abritis, and Z. Coble. 2016. “An Investigation of Retracted Articles in the Biomedical Literature.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 79th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Creating Knowledge, Enhancing Lives through Information & Technology. Copenhagen: Denmark October 14 –18.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, N., H. Delaney, and S. Spoelstra. 2017. “The Gray Zone: Questionable Research Practices in the Business School.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 16 (1): 94–109. doi:10.5465/amle.2015.0201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagney, H., R. Horton, A. James, S. Kleinert, Z. Nyakoojo, L. Pryce, E. Grainger, D. Stanley, and H. Wang. 2016. “Retraction and republication—A New Tool for Correcting the Scientific Record?” European Science Editing 42 (1): 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, J. D., B. Dellva, P. J. Emmanuel, and R. Parchure. 2011. “Ethical Considerations in Scientific Writing.” Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS 32 (2): 124–128. doi:10.4103/0253-7184.85425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castillo, M. 2009. “Authorship and Bylines.” American Journal of Neuroradiology 30 (8): 1455–1456. doi:10.3174/AJNR.A1636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics Council). 2019. “COPE Guidelines: Retraction Guidelines.” Accessed 1 March 2021. https://publicationethics.org/retraction-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics Council). 2021. “Flowcharts.” Accessed March 1, 2021. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/Flowcharts
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A., R. Craig, and D. Tourish. 2018. “Retraction Statements and Research Malpractice in Economics.” Research Policy 47 (5): 924–935. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craiga, R., A. Coxb, D. Tourishc, and A. Thorped. 2020. “Using Retracted Journal Articles in Psychology to Understand Research Misconduct in the Social Sciences: What Is to Be Done?” Research Policy 49: 4. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2009. “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Survey Data.” PLoS ONE 4: 5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2016. “Set up a ‘Self-retraction’ System for Honest Errors.” Nature 531 (7595): 415. doi:10.1038/531415a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D., J. P. A. Ioannidis, and S. Goodman. 2018. “Improving the Integrity of Published Science: An Expanded Taxonomy of Retractions and Corrections.” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 48 (4). doi: 10.1111/eci.12898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D., R. Costas, and V. Lariviere. 2015. “Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.” PLoS ONE 10: 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F. C., R. Grant Steen, and A. Casadevall. 2012. “Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications.” PNAS 109 (42): 17028–17033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., and Y. Li. 2007. “Language Re-use among Chinese Apprentice Scientists Writing for Publication.” Applied Linguistics 28 (3): 440–465. doi:10.1093/APPLIN/AMM031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieneisen, M. L., and M. Zhang. 2012. “A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature.” PLoS ONE 7: 10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halevi, G. 2020. “Why Articles in Arts and Humanities are Being Retracted?” Publishing Research Quarterly 36 (1): 55–62. doi:10.1007/s12109-019-09699-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J., and B. R. Martin. 2019. “Towards a Taxonomy of Research Misconduct: The Case of Business School Research.” Research Policy 48 (2): 414–427. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, T. 2012. “Retraction of Global Scientific Publications from 2001 to 2010.” Scientometrics 96 (2): 555–561. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0906-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G. 2018. “Disciplinary Knowledge Making and Academic Discourse.” In Reconceptualizing English Language Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century, edited by Y. Leung, J. Katchen, S. Hwang, and Y. Chen, 553–573. Taipei: Republic of China: Crane Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., and J. Lei. 2012. “Investigating Chinese University Students’ Knowledge of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism from an Integrated Perspective.” Language Learning 62 (3): 813–850. doi:10.1111/J.1467-9922.2011.00650.X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., and S. Xu. 2020. “Agency and Responsibility: A Linguistic Analysis of Culpable Acts in Retraction Notices.” Lingua 247. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jawaid, S. A. 2018. “Honest Errors and Self-retraction Should Not Be Stigmatized or Penalized.” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 34 (1): 1–2. doi:10.12669/pjms.341.14470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, L. K., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. “Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling.” Psychological Science 23 (5): 524–532. doi:10.1177/0956797611430953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. 2006. “Assessing the Seriousness of Research Misconduct: Considerations for Sanction Assignment.” Accountability in Research 13 (2): 179–205. doi:10.1080/08989620500440261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lei, L., and Y. Zhang. 2018. “Lack of Improvement in Scientific Integrity: An Analysis of WoS Retractions by Chinese Researchers (1997–2016).” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (5): 1409–1420. doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9962-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S. F., G. Z. Jin, B. Uzzi, and B. Jones. 2013. “The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science.” Scientific Reports 3. doi:10.1038/srep03146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, A. 2011. “Why Was that Paper Retracted? Editor to Retraction Watch: ‘It’s None of Your Damn Business’.” In: Retraction Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. 2016. “Ethics and Integrity in Publishing.” In How to Get Published in the Best Management Journals, edited by C. Timothy, 29–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elga.
   Google Scholar
• Oransky, I. 2014. “SAGE Publications Busts ‘Peer Review and Citation Ring,’ 60 Papers Retracted.” Retraction Watch (blog). Accessed 24 March, 2021. https://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/08/sage-publications-busts-peer-review-and-citation-ring-60-papers-retracted/
   Google Scholar
• Oransky, I. 2015.“What Should an Ideal Retraction Notice Look Like?” In Retraction Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. 1979. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Revised edion. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Retraction Watch. n.d. “Retraction Watch Database User Guide Appendix B: Reasons.” In Retraction Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, M. D., and S. M. R. Vasconcelos. 2018. “Retractions Covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 Period: Prevalence for the Most Productive Countries.” Scientometrics 114 (2): 719–734. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2621-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. 2018. “An Analysis of the Validity of Retraction Annotation in PubMed and the Web of Science.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 69 (2): 318–328. doi:10.1002/asi.23913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, R. G. 2011. “Retractions in the Scientific Literature: Do Authors Deliberately Commit Research Fraud?” Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (2): 113–117. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.038125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigbrand, T. 2017. “Retraction Note to Multiple Articles in Tumor Biology.” Tumour Biology. doi:10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A. 2015. “Silent or Stealth Retractions, the Dangerous Voices of the Unknown, Deleted Literature.” Publishing Research Quarterly 32 (1): 44–53. doi:10.1007/s12109-015-9439-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira da Silva, J. A., and A. Al-Khatib. 2019. “Ending the Retraction Stigma: Encouraging the Reporting of Errors in the Biomedical Record.” Research Ethics 1–9. doi:10.1177/1747016118802970.
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, T. N., and M. Luwel. 2014. “An In-depth Analysis of Papers Retracted in the Web of Science.” Paper presented at the Context Counts: Pathways to Master Big and Little Data, September. Leiden, The Netherlands, 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q.-H. 2019. “The Limitations of Retraction Notices and the Heroic Acts of Authors Who Correct the Scholarly Record: An Analysis of Retractions of Papers Published from 1975 to 2019.” Learned Publishing 33 (3): 119–130. doi:10.1002/leap.1282.
   Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q.-H. 2020. “Reform Retractions to Make Them More Transparent.” Nature. 582(7811): 149. doi:10.1038/D41586-020-01694-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, Q.-H., V.-P. La, M.-T. Ho, T.-T. Vuong, and M.-T. Ho. 2020. “Characteristics of Retracted Articles Based on Retraction Data from Online Sources through February 2019.” Science Editing 7 (1): 34–44. doi:10.31219/OSF.IO/NJSY8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager, E., V. Barbour, S. Yentis, and S. Kleinert. 2009. “Retraction Guidelines.” Accessed 1 April 2020. https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P., and E. Wager. 2013. “Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings from a Qualitative Study.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9292-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, K. B., and L. E. Andersen. 2018. “Retractions in Science.” Scientometrics 117 (3): 2009–2019. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2922-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S., and G. Hu. 2021. “Retraction Notices as A High-stakes Academic Genre: A Move Analysis.” In Approaches to Specialized Genres, edited by Kathy Ling, L. I., N. Mwinlaaru, and D. Tay, 101–120. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, S., and G. Hu. 2018. “Retraction Notices: Who Authored Them?” Publications 6: 1. doi:10.3390/publications6010002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, S., and D. De. 2013. “Author Misconduct: What Journal Editors Do When They Suspect and Find It?” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 79 (4): 453–456. doi:10.4103/0378-6323.113070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo-Teh, Y., N. Nicole Shu Ling, and B. Bor Luen Tang. in press. “A research misconduct severity matrix that could serve to harmonize adjudication of findings” Accountability in Research: 1 (15) doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1917398.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., and M. L. Grieneisen. 2013. “The Impact of Misconduct on the Published Medical and Non-medical Literature, and the News Media.” Scientometrics 96 (2): 573–587. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0920-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (Helen). 2016. Against Plagiarism: A Guide for Editors and Authors. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar