OHSU Employees’ Opinions of Receipt of Clinical Care and Participation in Clinical Research at Place of Employment

References

• ADDIN EN.REFLIST1. Largent EA, Lynch HF. Addressing Financial Barriers to Enrollment in Clinical Trials. JAMA Oncology. 2018;4(7):913.
   Google Scholar
• Varse F, Janani L, Moradi Y, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Rimaz S. Challenges in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting in randomized clinical trial studies: A systematic review. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2019;33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• What constistues coercion or undeu influence when employees are the subjects of research? Office for Human Research Protections: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; [ Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/faq/informed-consent/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Welch MJ, Lally R, Miller JE, Pittman S, Brodsky L, Caplan AL, et al. The ethics and regulatory landscape of including vulnerable populations in pragmatic clinical trials. Clinical Trials. 2015;12(5):503–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Klitzman R. Voluntariness of Consent to Research: A Preliminary Empirical Investigation. IRB: Ethics & Human Research. 2009;31 (No.6 (Nov. - Dec.)):10-4.
   Google Scholar
• Klitzman R. How IRBs view and make decisions about coercion and undue influence: Table 1. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2013;39(4):224–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London AJ. Reasonable risks in clinical research: a critique and a proposal for the Integrative Approach. Statistics in Medicine. 2006;25(17):2869–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher JA. Expanding the Frame of “Voluntariness” in Informed Consent: Structural Coercion and the Power of Social and Economic Context. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 2013;23(4):355–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton LB, Erlen JA, Glad JM, Siminoff LA. Recruiting vulnerable populations for research: Revisiting the ethical issues. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2003;19(2):106–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipnis K. Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants. 2001;2: G-1–G-13.
   Google Scholar
• Levine C, Faden R, Grady C, Hammerschmidt D, Eckenwiler L, Sugarman J. The Limitations of “Vulnerability” as a Protection for Human Research Participants. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2004;4(3):44–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivayogi P. Vulnerable population and methods for their safeguard. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2013; 4(Jan-Mar):53–7.
   Google Scholar
• Resnik DB. Employees as Research Participants: Ethical and Policy Issues. IRB: Ethics & Human Research. 2016;38(4):11–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walker DM, Johnson T, Ford EW, Huerta TR. Trust Me, I’m a Doctor: Examining Changes in How Privacy Concerns Affect Patient Withholding Behavior. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19(1):e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepp SL, Tarraf RC, Birney A, Arain MA. Evaluation of the awareness and effectiveness of IT security programs in a large publicly funded health care system. Health Information Management Journal. 2018;47(3):116–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellar-Guenther Y. Workplace Wellness Programs and Accessibility for All. AMA Journal of Ethics. 2016;18(4):393–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Padula WV, Padula WV. Is it worth the effort to create a learning healthcare delivery system? Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice. 2015;1(1):8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Pandiya A. Readability and Comprehensibility of Informed Consent Forms for Clinical Trials. Perspectives in clinical research. 2010;1( Jul-Sep 2010):87–112.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenzer KJ. Protecting vulnerable subjects in clinical research: children, pregnant women, prisoners, and employees. Respir Care. 2008;53(10):1342–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SS, Grayson MH. Clinical research: protection of the “vulnerable”? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(5):1103–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnegan M, O’Donoghue B. Rethinking vulnerable groups in clinical research. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine. 2019;36(1):63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deane JA, Clunie G. Healthcare professionals in research (HPiR) Facebook community: a survey of U.K. doctoral and postdoctoral healthcare professionals outside of medicine. BMC Medical Education. 2021;21(1).
   Google Scholar
• Largent EA, Joffe S, Miller FG. Can RESEARCH and CARE Be Ethically Integrated? Hastings Center Report. 2011;41(4):37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kass NE, Faden RR, Goodman SN, Pronovost P, Tunis S, Beauchamp TL. The Research-Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight. Hastings Center Report. 2013;43(s1):S4–S15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stata Statistical Software: Release 15.: StataCorp.; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hackshaw A. Small studies: strengths and limitations. European Respiratory Journal. 2008;32(5):1141–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 2019 FACT BOOK. Oregon Health and Science University; 2020 February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser AC, Cai Z, Louwerse MM, Daniel F. Question Understanding Aid (QUAID): A Web Facility that Tests Question Comprehensibility. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2006;70(1):3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDavitt B, Bogart LM, Mutchler MG, Wagner GJ, Green HD, Lawrence SJ, et al. Dissemination as Dialogue: Building Trust and Sharing Research Findings Through Community Engagement. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2016;13.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner RM. Ethical review of research involving human subjects: When and why is IRB review necessary? Muscle & Nerve. 2003;28(1):27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar