Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil

References

• AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2011. “Annual Meeting.” Science without Borders. https://www.aaas.org/news/science-without-borders-registration-opens-2011-aaas-annual-meeting-washington-dc
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, C. G. G., A. Wilson, and R. Sleeman. 2018. “Statistical Significance — Meaningful or Not.” Law Probability and Risk 17 (2): 157–162. doi:10.1093/lpr/mgy005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ALLEA (All European Academies). 2017. “The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity.” https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, R. M. V. R., K. A. Rocha, F. Catelani, A. J. Fontes-Pereira, and S. M. R. Vasconcelos. 2016. “Plagiarism Allegations Account for Most Retractions in Major Latin American/Caribbean Databases.” Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (5): 1447–1456. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9714-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., and N. H. Steneck. 2010. International Research Collaborations: Much to Be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., and N. H. Steneck. 2011. “The Problem of Plagiarism.” Urologic Oncology 29 (1): 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arumugam, A., and F. K. Aldhafiri. 2016. “A Researcher’s Ethical Dilemma: Is Self-plagiarism A Condemnable Practice or Not?” Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 32 (6): 427–429. doi:10.1080/09593985.2016.1185894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. 2016. “1,500 Scientists Lift the Lid on Reproducibility.” Nature 533 (7604): 452–454. doi:10.1038/533452a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bašić, Ž., I. Kružić, I. Jerković, I. Buljan, and A. Marušić. 2019. “Attitudes and Knowledge about Plagiarism among University Students: Cross-sectional Survey at the University of Split, Croatia.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (5): 1467–1483. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0073-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendiscioli, S., and M. S. Garfinkel. 2020. “Governance of Research Integrity: Options for a Coordinated Approach in Europe.” European Molecular Biology Organization. https://www.embo.org/documents/science_policy/governance_of_ri.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biagioli, M. 2012. “Recycling Texts or Stealing Time? Plagiarism, Authorship, and Credit in Science.” International Journal of Cultural Property 19 (3): 453–476. doi:10.1017/S0940739112000276.
   Google Scholar
• Bouville, M. 2008. “Plagiarism: Words and Ideas.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3): 311–322. doi:10.1007/s11948-008-9057-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, J., and J. You. 2018. “What a Massive Database of Retracted Papers Reveals about Science Publishing’s ‘Death Penalty’.” Science. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-database-retracted-papers-reveals-about-science-publishing-s-death-penalty
   Google Scholar
• Bretag, T. 2007. “The Emperor’s New Clothes: Yes, There Is a Link between English Language Competence and Academic Standards.” People and Place 15 (1): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Broome, M. E. 2004. “Self-plagiarism: Oxymoron, Fair Use, or Scientific Misconduct?” Nursing Outlook 52 (6): 273–274. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2004.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bülow, W., and G. Helgesson. 2019. “Criminalization of Scientific Misconduct.” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 22 (2): 245–252. doi:10.1007/s11019-018-9865-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. 1991. “Response-order Effects in Likert-type Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 51 (3): 531–540. doi:10.1177/0013164491513002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and C. Chou. 2017. “Are We on the Same Page? College Students’ and Faculty’s Perception of Student Plagiarism in Taiwan.” Ethics & Behavior 27 (1): 53–73. doi:10.1080/10508422.2015.1123630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., L. Miao, D. Murray, N. Robinson-García, R. Costas, and C. R. Sugimoto. 2018. “A Global Comparison of Scientific Mobility and Collaboration according to National Scientific Capacities.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 3 (17). doi:10.3389/frma.2018.00017.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, D. T., and P. Ginsparg. 2015. “Patterns of Text Reuse in a Scientific Corpus.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (1): 25–30. doi:10.1073/pnas.1415135111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). 2011. “Diretrizes Sobre Integridade Científica.” CNPq. October 17. https://www.gov.br/cnpq/pt-br/composicao/comissao-de-integridade
   Google Scholar
• CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). 2016a. “Diretório Dos Grupos de Pesquisa No Brasil.” CNPq. Accessed 4 June 2021. http://lattes.cnpq.br/web/dgp/por-area1
   Google Scholar
• CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). 2016b. “Painel Lattes.” CNPq. November 30. http://estatico.cnpq.br/painelLattes/
   Google Scholar
• CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). 2021a. “Sobre a Plataforma Lattes.” Plataforma Lattes. Accessed 3 June 2021. http://lattes.cnpq.br/web/plataforma-lattes/historico
   Google Scholar
• CNPq (Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development). 2021b. “Tabela de Áreas Do Conhecimento.” Plataforma Lattes. Accessed 12 July 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, S. D., M. P. Couper, and M. J. Lamias. 2001. “Web Surveys: Perceptions of Burden.” Social Science Computer Review 19 (2): 146–162. doi:10.1177/089443930101900202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, D., S. Thomson, and A. Sinclair. 2017. “Research in Brazil: A Report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics.” https://observatoriodoconhecimento.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/04-Research-in-Brazil.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D., and D. Moher. 2019. “What Difference Do Retractions Make? An Estimate of the Epistemic Impact of Retractions on Recent Meta-analyses.” BioRxiv. doi:10.1101/734137.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, F. C., R. G. Steen, and A. Casadevall. 2012. “Misconduct Accounts for the Majority of Retracted Scientific Publications.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (42): 17028–17033. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation). 2014. “Code of Good Scientific Practice.” http://www.fapesp.br/boaspraticas/FAPESP-Code_of_Good_Scientific_Practice_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. R. 2019. “Francis Mojica, the Spanish Scientist Who Discovered CRISPR.” Labiotech. April 8. https://www.labiotech.eu/interviews/francis-mojica-crispr-interview/
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. A., and M. J. Zigmond. 2011. “Educational Approaches for Discouraging Plagiarism.” Urology and Oncology 29 (1): 100–103. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. R., and K. M. Partin. 2014. “The Challenges for Scientists in Avoiding Plagiarism.” Accountability in Research 21 (6): 353–365. doi:10.1080/08989621.2013.877348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesike, S., B. Widenmayer, O. Gassmann, and T. Schildhauer. 2015. “Opening Science: Towards an Agenda of Open Science in Academia and Industry.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (4): 581–601. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9375-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardenier, J., and D. B. Resnik. 2002. “The Misuse of Statistics: Concepts, Tools, and a Research Agenda.” Accountability in Research 9 (2): 65–74. doi:10.1080/08989620212968.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gliem, J., and R. Gliem. 2003. “Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-type Scales.” In 2003 Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing and Community Education, 82–88. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, B. 2010. “Plagiarism Retracts Review.” The Scientist. March 31. https://www.the-scientist.com/the-nutshell/plagiarism-retracts-review-43390
   Google Scholar
• Havilland, C. P., and J. A. Mullin. 2009. Who Owns This Text?: Plagiarism, Authorship, and Disciplinary Cultures. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heitman, E., and S. Litewka. 2011. “International Perspectives on Plagiarism and Considerations for Teaching International Trainees.” Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 29 (1): 104–108. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselmann, F., V. Graf, M. Schmidt, and M. Reinhart. 2017. “The Visibility of Scientific Misconduct: A Review of the Literature on Retracted Journal Articles.” Current Sociology 65 (6): 814–845. doi:10.1177/0011392116663807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horbach, S. P. J. M., and W. Halffman. 2018. “The Changing Forms and Expectations of Peer Review.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s41073-018-0051-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horbach, S. P. J. M., and W. Halffman. 2019. “The Extent and Causes of Academic Text Recycling or ‘Self-plagiarism’.” Research Policy 48 (2): 492–502. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., and J. Lei. 2015. “Chinese University Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism.” Ethics & Behavior 25 (3): 233–255. doi:10.1080/10508422.2014.923313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husain, F. M., G. K. S. Al-Shaibani, and O. H. A. Mahfoodh. 2017. “Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism and Factors Contributing to Plagiarism: A Review of Studies.” Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (2): 167–195. doi:10.1007/s10805-017-9274-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israel, G. D. 2009. Determining Sample Size. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Krokoscz, M., and S. M. S. P. Ferreira. 2019. “Perceptions of Graduate Students at the University of São Paulo about Plagiarism Practices in Academic Works.” Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 91 (2): e20180196. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201920180196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFollette, M. C. 1992. Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, P. J. 2008. Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. 1 vols. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781412963947.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner, I., R. Hastings, N. Evans, and H. Desmond. 2021. “Research Misconduct.” The Embassy of Good Science. March 27. https://embassy.science/wiki/Theme:28a0859b-9e52-4af4-97f0-b0f8eeac1f1c
   Google Scholar
• Lindahl, J. F., and D. Grace. 2018. “Students’ and Supervisors’ Knowledge and Attitudes regarding Plagiarism and Referencing.” Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/s41073-018-0054-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, M., and F. Keusch. 2017. “Effects of Scale Direction on Response Style of Ordinal Rating Scales.” Journal of Official Statistics 33 (1): 137–154. doi:10.1515/jos-2017-0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, H. 2009. Handbook of Biological Statistics. Baltimore, MD: Sparky House Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1957. “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science.” American Sociological Review 22 (6): 635–659. doi:10.2307/2089193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska, A. I. 2017. “Plagiarism and National Differences. Variation in Practice and Attitudes Towards Academic Dishonesty among European Students.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Coventry University, Coventry. https://curve.coventry.ac.uk/open/file/e8a8bd26-0ec5-44be-82bf-ab17d7325972/1/Binder1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morris, N. 2015. “Providing Ethical Guidance for Collaborative Research in Developing Countries.” Research Ethics 11 (4): 211–235. doi:10.1177/1747016115586759.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. 2009. On Being A Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK214564/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2018. Semiannual Report to Congress. https://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2018/NSF-OIG-SAR-11302018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nature Medicine. 2009. “The Insider’s Guide to Plagiarism.” Nature Medicine 15 (7): 707. doi:10.1038/nm0709-707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy). 2000. Federal Research Misconduct Policy. Federal Register. 65 (235): 76260–76264.
   Google Scholar
• Penders, B. 2018. “Beyond Trust: Plagiarism and Truth.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 15 (1): 29–32. doi:10.1007/s11673-017-9825-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. 1996. “Borrowing Others’ Words: Text, Ownership, Memory, and Plagiarism.” TESOL Quarterly 30 (2): 201–223. doi:10.2307/3588141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pupovac, V., and D. Fanelli. 2015. “Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys.” Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (5): 1331–1352. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik DB, Rasmussen LM, and Kissling GE. An international study of research misconduct policies. Account Res. 2015;22(5):249–266. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.958218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., K. C. Elliott, P. A. Soranno, and E. M. Smith. 2017. “Data-intensive Science and Research Integrity.” Accountability in Research 24 (6): 344–358. doi:10.1080/08989621.2017.1327813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., L. M. Rasmussen, and G. E. Kissling. 2015. “An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies.” Accountability in Research 22 (5): 249–266. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.958218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., T. Neal, A. Raymond, and G. E. Kissling. 2015. “Research Misconduct Definitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions.” Accountability in Research 22 (1): 14–21. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.891943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., T. Neal, A. Raymond, and G. E. Kissling. 2015. “Research MisconductDe finitions Adopted by U.S. Research Institutions.” Accountability in Research 22 (1): 14–21. doi:10.1080/08989621.2014.891943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B., and Z. Master. 2013. “Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-income Countries.” PLoS Medicine 10 (3): e1001406. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. 2019. “Is It Time to Revise the Definition of Research Misconduct?” Accountability in Research 26 (2): 123–137. doi:10.1080/08989621.2019.1570156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, M. D., and S. M. R. Vasconcelos. 2018. “Retractions Covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 Period: Prevalence for the Most Productive Countries.” Scientometrics 114 (2): 719–734. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2621-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roig, M. 2015. “Avoiding Plagiarism, Self-plagiarism, and Other Questionable Writing Practices: A Guide to Ethical Writing.” Accessed 8 June 2021. https://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roig, M. 2010. “Plagiarism and Self-plagiarism: What Every Author Should Know.” Biochemia Medica 20 (3): 295–300. doi:10.11613/BM.2010.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolstad, S., J. Adler, and A. Rydén. 2011. “Response Burden and Questionnaire Length: Is Shorter Better? A Review and Meta-analysis.” Value in Health: The Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research 14 (8): 1101–1108. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. E., and J. Mirowsky. 1984. “Socially-desirable Response and Acquiescence in a Cross-cultural Survey of Mental Health.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 25 (2): 189–197. doi:10.2307/2136668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. 1994. “Self-plagiarism or Fair Use.” Communications of the ACM 37 (8): 21–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C. C., P. S. D. Santos, M. C. Sant’ana, H. Masuda, M. B. Barboza, and S. M. R. Vasconcelos. 2017. “Going beyond Academic Integrity Might Broaden Our Understanding of Plagiarism in Science Education: A Perspective from A Study in Brazil.” Anais Da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 89 (1 suppl): 757–771. doi:10.1590/0001-3765201720160474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C. M. D. 2003. “Tradições E Contradições Da Pós-graduação No Brasil.” Educação & Sociedade 24 (83): 627–641. doi:10.1590/S0101-73302003000200016.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., M. G. De Jong, and H. Baumgartner. 2010. “Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (2): 199–214. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.2.199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. 1994. “Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What Has and Has Not Been Accomplished?” IJHE 65 (3): 310–330.
   Google Scholar
• Steneck, N. H. 1999. “Confronting Misconduct in Science in the 1980s and 1990s: What Has and Has Not Been Accomplished?” Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2): 161–176. doi:10.1007/s11948-999-0005-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, B. M., and E. K. O’Shea. 2019. “A Proposal for the Future of Scientific Publishing in the Life Sciences.” PLoS Biology 17 (2): e3000116. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sticklen, M. B. 2010. “Retraction Note: Plant Genetic Engineering for Biofuel Production: Towards Affordable Cellulosic Ethanol.” Nature Reviews Genetics 11 (4): 308. doi:10.1038/nrg2777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2017. “Research Cultures: Embedding Inclusive Excellence.” https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/Publications/2018/research-culture-workshop-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vale, R. D., and A. A. Hyman. 2016. “Priority of Discovery in the Life Sciences.” eLife 5: e16931. doi:10.7554/eLife.16931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese, J., and M. Jacob. 2015. “Do Medical Students Require Education on Issues Related to Plagiarism?” Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 12 (2): 82–87. doi:10.20529/IJME.2015.026.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasconcelos, S. M. R., N. H. Steneck, M. Anderson, H. Masuda, M. Palacios, J. C. S. Pinto, and M. M. Sorenson. 2012. “The New Geography of Scientific Collaborations.” EMBO Reports 13 (5): 404–407. doi:10.1038/embor.2012.51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, S., J. Leta, L. Costa, A. Pinto, and M. M. Sorenson. 2009. “Discussing Plagiarism in Latin American Science.” EMBO Reports 10 (7): 677–682. doi:10.1038/embor.2009.134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. 2000. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, N., B. Nemery, and K. Dierickx. 2020. “Perceptions of Plagiarism by Biomedical Researchers: An Online Survey in Europe and China.” BMC Medical Ethics 21 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1186/s12910-020-00473-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I. 2007. “Plagiarism? No, We’re Just Borrowing Better English.” Nature 449 (7163): 658. doi:10.1038/449658a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafarghandi, A. M., F. Khoshroo, and B. Barkat. 2012. “An Investigation of Iranian EFL Masters Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 8 (2): 69–85. doi:10.21913/IJEI.v8i2.811.
   Google Scholar