Publication Cover
Accountability in Research
Ethics, Integrity and Policy
Volume 30, 2023 - Issue 7
113
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Are highly ranked dental journals at risk of editorial bias? An examination of information on the reporting of peer-review practices

References

  • Bosch, X., J. M. Pericas, C. Hernández, and P. Doti. 2013. “Financial, Nonfinancial and Editors’ Conflicts of Interest in High-Impact Biomedical Journals.” European Journal of Clinical Investigation 43 (7): 660–667. doi:10.1111/eci.12090.
  • Chavalarias, D., and J. P. A. Ioannidis. 2010. “Science Mapping Analysis Characterizes 235 Biases in Biomedical Research.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63 (11): 1205–1215. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.011.
  • Dal-Ré, R., A. L. Caplan, and A. Marusic. 2019. “Editors’ and Authors’ Individual Conflicts of Interest Disclosure and Journal Transparency. A Cross-Sectional Study of High-Impact Medical Specialty Journals.” BMJ Open 9 (7): e029796. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029796.
  • Dunn, A. G., D. Arachi, J. Hudgins, G. Tsafnat, E. Coiera, and F. T. Bourgeois. 2014. “Financial Conflicts of Interest and Conclusions about Neuraminidase Inhibitors for Influenza: An Analysis of Systematic Reviews.” Annals of Internal Medicine 161 (7): 513–518. doi:10.7326/M14-0933.
  • Dwan, K., C. Gamble, P. R. Williamson, and J. J. Kirkham; Reporting Bias Group. 2013. “Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias - An Updated Review.” PloS One 8 (7): e66844. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066844.
  • Faggion, C. M. 2021. “Watching the Watchers: A Report on the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest by Editors and Editorial Board Members of Dental Journals.” European Journal of Oral Sciences 129 (6): e12823. doi:10.1111/eos.12823.
  • Faggion, C. M., Jr, N. P. Bakas, and J. Wasiak. 2017. “A Survey of Prevalence of Narrative and Systematic Reviews in Five Major Medical Journals.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 17 (1): 176. doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y.
  • Grilli, J., and S. Allesina. 2017. “Last Name Analysis of Mobility, Gender Imbalance, and Nepotism across Academic Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 (29): 7600–7605. doi:10.1073/pnas.1703513114.
  • Harris, M., J. Marti, H. Watt, Y. Bhatti, J. Macinko, and A. W. Darzi. 2017. “Explicit Bias Toward High-Income-Country Research: A Randomized, Blinded, Crossover Experiment Of English Clinicians.” Health Affairs (Project Hope) 36 (11): 1997–2004. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0773.
  • “Journal Impact Factor - Journal Citation Reports - Web of Science Group. O. J.” Accessed 1 January 2022. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/journal-citation-reports/
  • Lang, T. A., and D. G. Altman. 2015. “Basic Statistical Reporting for Articles Published in Biomedical Journals: The ‚statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature‘ or the SAMPL Guidelines.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 52 (1): 5–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006.
  • Luty, J., S. M. R. Arokiadass, J. M. Easow, and J. R. Anapreddy. 2009. “Preferential Publication of Editorial Board Members in Medical Specialty Journals.” Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3): 200–202. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.026740.
  • McGauran, N., B. Wieseler, J. Kreis, Y.-B. Schüler, H. Kölsch, and T. Kaiser. 2010. “Reporting Bias in Medical Research - a Narrative Review.” Trials 11 (April): 37. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-37.
  • Meena, S., and B. Chowdhury. 2014. “How International are the Leading Orthopedic Journals: A Look at the Composition of the Editorial Board Members of the Top Orthopedic Journals.” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 134 (5): 619–622. doi:10.1007/s00402-014-1975-y.
  • Park, B., E. Sohn, and S. Kim. 2020. “Does the Pressure to Fill Journal Quotas Bias Evaluation?: Evidence from Publication Delays and Rejection Rates.” PLoS One 15 (8): e0236927. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0236927.
  • Rivara, F. P., P. Cummings, S. Ringold, A. B. Bergman, A. Joffe, and D. A. Christakis. 2007. “A Comparison of Reviewers Selected by Editors and Reviewers Suggested by Authors.” The Journal of Pediatrics 151 (2): 202–205. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.008.
  • Rösing, C. K., R. Junges, and A. Nogueira Haas. 2014. “Publication Rates of Editorial Board Members in Oral Health Journals.” Brazilian Oral Research 28 (1): S1806–83242014000100260. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2014.vol28.0042.
  • Savovic, J., R. M. Turner, D. Mawdsley, H. E. Jones, R. Beynon, J. P. T. Higgins, and J. A. C. Sterne. 2018. “Association between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study.” American Journal of Epidemiology 187 (5): 1113–1122. doi:10.1093/aje/kwx344.
  • Scanff, A., F. Naudet, I. A. Cristea, D. Moher, D. V. M. Bishop, and C. Locher. 2021. “A Survey of Biomedical Journals to Detect Editorial Bias and Nepotistic Behavior.” PLoS Biology 19 (11): e3001133. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001133.
  • Schroter, S., L. Tite, A. Hutchings, and N. Black. 2006. “Differences in Review Quality and Recommendations for Publication between Peer Reviewers Suggested by Authors or by Editors.” JAMA 295 (3): 314–317. doi:10.1001/jama.295.3.314.
  • Tomkins, A., M. Zhang, and W. D. Heavlin. 2017. “Reviewer Bias in Single- Versus Double-Blind Peer Review.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 (48): 12708–12713. doi:10.1073/pnas.1707323114.
  • Tutarel, O. 2005. “How International Are Leading General Paediatric Journals?” Archives of Disease in Childhood 90 (8): 816–817. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.074385.
  • Tutarel, O. 2004. “Composition of the Editorial Boards of Leading Medical Education Journals.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 4 (Januar): 3. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-4-3.
  • Wager, E., S. Fiack, C. Graf, A. Robinson, and I. Rowlands. 2009. “Science Journal Editors’ Views on Publication Ethics: Results of an International Survey.” Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6): 348–353. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028324.
  • Wager, E., E. C. Parkin, and P. S. Tamber. 2006. “Are Reviewers Suggested by Authors as Good as Those Chosen by Editors? Results of a Rater-Blinded, Retrospective Study.” BMC Medicine 4 (Mai): 13. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-4-13.
  • Wenneras, C., and A. Wold. 1997. “Nepotism and Sexism in Peer-Review.” Nature 387 (6631): 341–343. doi:10.1038/387341a0.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.