De-naturalizing the “predatory”: A study of “bogus” publications at public sector universities in Pakistan

References

• Atiso, K., J. Kammer, and J. Bossaller. 2019. “Predatory Publishing and the Ghana Experience: A Call to Action for Information Professionals.” IFLA journal 45 (4): 277–288. doi:10.1177/0340035219868816.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, J. 2012. “Predatory Publishers Are Corrupting Open Access.” Nature 489 (7415): 179. doi:10.1038/489179a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beall, J. 2014. “Unintended Consequences: The Rise of Predatory Publishers and the Future of Scholarly Publishing.” IARTEM E-Journal 2 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, M. 2017. “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Predatory Publishing but Were Afraid to Ask Introduction: Librarians and Predatory Publishing.” Association of College and Research Libraries 206–217.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of Theory and Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power, edited by B. T. John. Cambridge: England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and J. D. Wacquant. 1992a. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and T. Eagleton. 1992e. “Doxa and Common Life.” New Left Review 191 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, D. 2013. “The Dark Side of Publishing.” New Scientist 217 (2910): 29. doi:10.1016/S0262-4079(13)60817-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavarro, D., P. Tang, and I. Ràfols. 2017. “Why Researchers Publish in non-mainstream Journals: Training, Knowledge Bridging, and Gap Filling.” Research Policy 46 (9): 1666–1680. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobey, K. D., M. M. Lalu, B. Skidmore, N. Ahmadzai, A. Grudniewicz, and D. Moher. 2018. “What Is A Predatory Journal? A Scoping Review.” F1000Research 7:1–30. doi:10.12688/f1000research.15256.1.
   Google Scholar
• Dadkhah, M., L. Mohammad, and G. Borchardt. 2017. “Questionable Papers in Citation Databases as an Issue for Literature Review.” Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling 11 (2): 181–185. doi:10.1007/s12079-016-0370-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, S. B. 2018. “Predatory Journals: Who Publishes in Them and Why?” Journal of Informetrics 12 (4): 1296–1311. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinis-Oliveira, R. J. 2021. “Predatory Journals and Meetings in Forensic Sciences: What Every Expert Needs to Know about This “Parasitic” Publishing Model.” Forensic Sciences Research 6 (4): 303–309. doi:10.1080/20961790.2021.1989548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebadi, S., and Z. Gerannaz. 2018. “Predatory Publishing as A Case of Symbolic Violence: A Critical English for Academic Purposes Approach.” Cogent Education 5 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1501889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, S., and G. Helgesson. 2017. “The False Academy: Predatory Publishing in Science and Bioethics.” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy 20 (2): 163–170. doi:10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 1992. Pierre Bourdieu. New York: Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, A. A. 2021. “Rising Reliance on Predatory Publishing as Research Expands.” https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=2021062608133724
   Google Scholar
• Kozak, M., O. Lefremova, and J. Hartlye. 2016. “Spamming in Scholarly Publishing: A Case Study.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 67 (8). doi:10.1002/asi.23521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, R., M. Babur, and N. Siddiqui. 2017. “Research and Development: Review of Research Performance in Higher Education Sector in the Last Decade.” Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Machacek, V., and M. Srholec. 2021. “Predatory Publishing in Scopus: Evidence on Cross-Country Differences.” Scientometrics 126 (3): 1897–1921. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03852-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masood, E. 2018. “What Pakistan’s new government means for science.” https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05974-5
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A. R. 2018. “How to Respond to and What to Do for Papers Published in Predatory Journals?” Science Editing 5 (2): 146–149. doi:10.6087/KCSE.140.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, D., and K. Inouye. 2021. “Problematizing ‘Predatory Publishing’: A Systematic Review of Factors Shaping Publishing Motives, Decisions, and Experiences.” Learned Publishing 34 (2): 89–104. doi:10.1002/leap.1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natow, R. S. 2019. “The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Studies Employing Elite Interviews.” Qualitative Research 20 (2): 160–173. doi:10.1177/1468794119830077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negahdary, M. 2017. “Identifying Scientific High Quality Journals and Publishers.” Publishing Research Quarterly 33 (4): 456–470. doi:10.1007/s12109-017-9541-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omobowale, A. O., O. Akanle, A. I. Adeniran, and K. Adegboyega. 2014. “Peripheral Scholarship and the Context of Foreign Paid Publishing in Nigeria.” Current Sociology 62 (5): 666–684. doi:10.1177/0011392113508127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pond, B. B., S. D. Brown, D. W. Stewart, D. S. Roane, and S. Harirforoosh. 2019. “Faculty Applicants’ Attempt to Inflate CVs Using Predatory Journals.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 83 (1): 7210. doi:10.5688/ajpe7210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapiro, G. 2015. “Field Theory.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, edited by J. Wright, D, 140–148. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, J. D. (2008). “Suffering.” In Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts (London and New York: Routledge) 179–194 , edited by M. G. Acumen.
   Google Scholar
• Shehata, A. M. K., and M. F. M. Elgllab. 2018. “Where Arab Social Science and Humanities Scholars Choose to Publish: Falling in the Predatory Journals Trap.” Learned Publishing 31 (3): 222–229. doi:10.1002/leap.1167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, C., and B. C. Björk. 2015. “‘Predatory’ Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Characteristics.” BMC Medicine 13 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, C. G. 2022. “Editorial Misconduct: The Case of Online Predatory Journals.” Heliyon 8 (January): e08999. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08999.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walther, M. 2014. Repatriation to France and Germany: A Comparative Study Based on Bourdieu’s Theory of Practice. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegmann, W. L. 2017. “Habitus, Symbolic Violence, and Reflexivity: Applying Bourdieu’s Theories to Social Work.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 44 (4): 95–116.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, J., J. L. Harmon, K. G. Connolly, R. M. Donnelly, M. R. Anderson, and H. A. Howard. 2015. “Who Publishes in “Predatory” Journals?” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (7): 1406–1417. doi:10.1002/asi.23265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousufzai, A. 2021. “Fraudulent Research Thriving in Pakistan Due to HEC’s Apathy.” https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/902868-fraudulent-research-thriving-in-pakistan-due-to-hec-s-apathy
   Google Scholar