Bicameral grant review: How a systems analyst with aids would reform research funding

References

• Angier , N. 1988 . Natural Obsessions: The Search for the Oncogene , 1 – 4 . Boston : Houghton‐Mifflin .
   Google Scholar
• Apirion , D. 1979 . Research funding and the peer review system . Fed. Proc. , 38 : 2649 – 50 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsdyke , D. R. 1983a . Canadian medical research strategy for the eighties. I. Damage‐limitation or super‐elitism as the basis for the distribution of research funds . Medical Hypothesis , 11 : 141 – 145 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsdyke , D. R. 1983b . Canadian medical research strategy for the eighties. II. Promise or performance as the basis for the distribution of research funds . Medical Hypothesis , 11 : 147 – 156 .
   Google Scholar
• Forsdyke , D. R. 1989a . A systems analyst asks about AIDS research funding . Lancet , 1 : 1382 – 84 .
   Google Scholar
• Forsdyke , D. R. 1989b . Peer review policy . The Scientist , 3 ( 16 ) : 13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsdyke , D. R. 1989c . Sudden‐death funding system . FASEB J. , 3 : 2221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsdyke , D R. 1991 . Bicameral grant review: an alternative to conventional peer review . FASEBJ. , 5 : 2312 – 2314 .
   Google Scholar
• Koshland , D. E. 1989 . The cystic fibrosis gene story . Science , 245 : 1029
   Google Scholar
• Lederberg , J. 1989 . Does scientific progress come from projects, or people? . Current Contents, Life Sciences , 32 ( 48 ) : 5 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Mandel , H. G. and Veseli , E. S. 1989 . NIH funding . FASEB J. , 3 : 2322 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Osmond , D. 1983 . Malice's wonderland. Research funding and peer review . J. Neurobiol. , 14 : 95 – 112 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar