Changes in brain morphometry after motor rehabilitation in chronic stroke

References

• Abela E, Seiler A, Missimer JH, Federspiel A, Hess CW, Sturzenegger M, Weder BJ, Wiest R. 2015. Grey matter volumetric changes related to recovery from hand paresis after cortical sensorimotor stroke. Brain Struct Funct. 220(5):2533–2550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abo M, Kakuda W, Momosaki R, Harashima H, Kojima M, Watanabe S, Sato T, Yokoi A, Umemori T, Sasanuma J. 2014. Randomized, multicenter, comparative study of NEURO versus CIMT in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: the NEURO-VERIFY Study. Int J Stroke. 9(5):607–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allman C, Amadi U, Winkler AM, Wilkins L, Filippini N, Kischka U, Stagg CJ, Johansen-Berg H. 2016. Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke. Sci Transl Med. 8(330):1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 2000. Voxel-based morphometry - The methods. Neuroimage. 11(6):805–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 57(1):289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A. 2004. Changes in grey matter induced by training Newly honed juggling skills show up as a transient feature on a brain-imaging scan. Nature. 427:311–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai J, Ji Q, Xin R, Zhang D, Na X, Peng R, Li K. 2016. Contralesional cortical structural reorganization contributes to motor recovery after sub-cortical stroke: a longitudinal voxel-based morphometry study. Front Hum Neurosci. 10(August):8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casula EP, Pellicciari MC, Bonnì S, Spanò B, Ponzo V, Salsano I, Giulietti G, Martino Cinnera A, Maiella M, Borghi I, et al. 2021. Evidence for interhemispheric imbalance in stroke patients as revealed by combining transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography. Hum Brain Mapp. 42(5):1343–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng B, Schulz R, Bönstrup M, Hummel FC, Sedlacik J, Fiehler J, Gerloff C, Thomalla G. 2015. Structural plasticity of remote cortical brain regions is determined by connectivity to the primary lesion in subcortical stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 35(9):1507–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corti M, Patten C, Triggs W. 2012. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor cortex after stroke: a focused review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 91(3):254–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coscia M, Wessel MJ, Chaudary U, Millán J, del R, Micera S, Guggisberg A, Vuadens P, Donoghue J, Birbaumer N, Hummel FC. 2019. Neurotechnology-aided interventions for upper limb motor rehabilitation in severe chronic stroke. Brain. 142(8):2182–2197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahnke R, Yotter RA, Gaser C. 2013. Cortical thickness and central surface estimation. Neuroimage. 65:336–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang C, Liu G, Xing S, Xie C, Peng K, Li C, Li J, Zhang J, Chen L, Pei Z, et al. 2013. Longitudinal cortical volume changes correlate with motor recovery in patients after acute local subcortical infarction. Stroke. 44(10):2795–2801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dankert HL, Davies PL, Gavin WJ. 2003. Occupational therapy effects on visual-motor skills in preschool children. Am J Occup Ther. 57(5):542–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd KC, Nair VA, Prabhakaran V. 2017. Role of the contralesional vs. Ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 11:469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ediri Arachchi W, Peng Y, Zhang X, Qin W, Zhuo C, Yu C, Liang M. 2020. A systematic characterization of structural brain changes in schizophrenia. Neurosci Bull. 36(10):1107–1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan F, Zhu C, Chen H, Qin W, Ji X, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhu L, Yu C. 2013. Dynamic brain structural changes after left hemisphere subcortical stroke. Hum Brain Mapp. 34(8):1872–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filippi M, Ceccarelli A, Pagani E, Gatti R, Rossi A, Stefanelli L, Falini A, Comi G, Rocca MA. 2010. Motor learning in healthy humans is associated to gray matter changes: a tensor-based morphometry study. PLoS One. 5(4):e10198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn FG, Benson DF, Ardila A. 1999. Anatomy of the insula - Functional and clinical correlates. Aphasiology. 13(1):55–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaser C, Dahnke R. 2012. A Computational Anatomy Toolbox for the Analysis of Structural MRI data. OHBM2016. 32(7):7743.
   Google Scholar
• Gaser C, Volz HP, Kiebel S, Riehemann S, Sauer H. 1999. Detecting structural changes in whole brain based on nonlinear deformations-application to schizophrenia research. Neuroimage. 10(2):107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier LV, Taub E, Mark VW, Barghi A, Uswatte G. 2012. Atrophy of spared gray matter tissue predicts poorer motor recovery and rehabilitation response in chronic stroke. Stroke. 43(2):453–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier LV, Taub E, Perkins C, Ortmann M, Mark VW, Uswatte G. 2008. Remodeling the brain: plastic structural brain changes produced by different motor therapies after stroke. Stroke. 39(5):1520–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. 2002. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 16(3):232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govender P, Kalra L. 2007. Benefits of occupational therapy in stroke rehabilitation. Expert Rev Neurother. 7(8):1013–1019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horn U, Roschka S, Eyme K, Walz AD, Platz T, Lotze M. 2016. Increased ventral premotor cortex recruitment after arm training in an fMRI study with subacute stroke patients. Behav Brain Res. 308:152–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyer EH, Celnik PA. 2011. Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 29(6):395–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. 2009. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 40(4):1386–1391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue K, Kawashima R, Sugiura M, Ogawa A, Schormann T, Zilles K, Fukuda H. 2001. Activation in the ipsilateral posterior parietal cortex during tool use: A PET study. Neuroimage. 14(6):1469–1475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakuda W, Abo M, Kobayashi K, Momosaki R, Yokoi A, Fukuda A, Ito H, Tominaga A. 2011. Combination treatment of low-frequency rTMS and occupational therapy with levodopa administration: An intensive neurorehabilitative approach for upper limb hemiparesis after stroke. Int J Neurosci. 121(7):373–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakuda W, Abo M, Sasanuma J, Shimizu M, Okamoto T, Kimura C, Kakita K, Hara H. 2016. Combination Protocol of Low-Frequency rTMS and Intensive Occupational Therapy for Post-stroke Upper Limb Hemiparesis: a 6-year Experience of More Than 1700 Japanese Patients. Transl Stroke Res. 7(3):172–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama M, Ono T, Yamashita F, Ebata H, Liu M, Kasuga S, Ushiba J. 2018. Structural Gray Matter Changes in the Hippocampus and the Primary Motor Cortex on An-Hour-to-One- Day Scale Can Predict Arm-Reaching Performance Improvement. Front Hum Neurosci. 12(June):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu J, Wang Q, Liu F, Song H, Liang X, Lin Z, Hong W, Yang S, Huang J, Zheng G, et al. 2017. Altered functional connectivity in patients with post-stroke memory impairment: a resting fMRI study. Exp Ther Med. 14(3):1919–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhi M, Merlo A, Prati P, Giacobbi M, Mazzoli D. 2016. Instrumental indices for upper limb function assessment in stroke patients: a validation study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 13(1):52–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May A, Gaser C. 2006. Magnetic resonance-based morphometry: a window into structural plasticity of the brain. Curr Opin Neurol. 19(4):407–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May A, Hajak G, Gänssbauer S, Steffens T, Langguth B, Kleinjung T, Eichhammer P. 2007. Structural brain alterations following 5 days of intervention: Dynamic aspects of neuroplasticity. Cereb Cortex. 17(1):205–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayka MA, Corcos DM, Leurgans SE, Vaillancourt DE. 2006. Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 31(4):1453–1474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merabet LB, Swisher JD, Mcmains SA, Halko MA, Amedi A, Pascual-Leone A, Somers DC. 2021. Combined activation and deactivation of visual cortex during tactile sensory processing. J Neurophysiol. 97(2):1633–1641.
   Google Scholar
• Mietchen D, Gaser C. 2009. Computational morphometry for detecting changes in brain structure due to development, aging, learning, disease and evolution. Front Neuroinform. 3(AUG):1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW, Taub E. 2001. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82(6):750–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pundik S, Scoco A, Skelly M, McCabe JP, Daly JJ. 2018. Greater cortical thickness is associated with enhanced sensory function after arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 32(6-7):590–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampaio-Baptista C, Sanders ZB, Johansen-Berg H. 2018. Structural plasticity in adulthood with motor learning and stroke rehabilitation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 41(January):25–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sampaio-Baptista C, Scholz J, Jenkinson M, Thomas AG, Filippini N, Smit G, Douaud G, Johansen-Berg H. 2014. Gray matter volume is associated with rate of subsequent skill learning after a long term training intervention. Neuroimage. 96(100):158–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Särkämö T, Ripollés P, Vepsäläinen H, Autti T, Silvennoinen HM, Salli E, Laitinen S, Forsblom A, Soinila S, Rodríguez-Fornells A. 2014. Structural changes induced by daily music listening in the recovering brain after middle cerebral artery stroke: A voxel-based morphometry study. Front Hum Neurosci. 8(1 APR):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steultjens EMJ, Dekker J, Bouter LM, Van de Nes JCM, Cup EHC, Van den Ende CHM. 2003. Occupational therapy for stroke patients: A systematic review. Stroke. 34(3):676–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan KJ, Tilson JK, Cen SY, Rose DK, Hershberg J, Correa A, Gallichio J, McLeod M, Moore C, Wu SS, et al. 2011. Fugl-meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke: Standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials. Stroke. 42(2):427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung WH, Wang CP, Chou CL, Chen YC, Chang YC, Tsai PY. 2013. Efficacy of coupling inhibitory and facilitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to enhance motor recovery in hemiplegic stroke patients. Stroke. 44(5):1375–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi N, Izumi S. 2013. Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: a review with a focus on neural plasticity. Stroke Res Treat. 2013:128641.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ueda R, Yamada N, Abo M, Ruwan PW, Senoo A. 2020. MRI evaluation of motor function recovery by rTMS and intensive occupational therapy and changes in the activity of motor cortex. Int J Neurosci. 130(3):309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda R, Yamada N, Abo M, Senoo A. 2019a. Relationship between motor function improvements and white matter structure after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus intensive occupational therapy in chronic subcortical stroke patients. Neuroreport. 30(7):485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda R, Yamada N, Abo M, Senoo A. 2019b. Correlation analysis of motor function improvement and brain structure for upper limb paralysis. Neuroreport. Neuroreport. 30(2):77–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda R, Yamada N, Abo M, Senoo A. 2019c. White matter changes follow low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus intensive occupational therapy for motor paralysis after stroke: a DTI study using TBSS. Acta Neurol Belg. 121(2):387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urushidani N, Kinoshita S, Okamoto T, Tamashiro H, Abo M. 2018. Low-Frequency rTMS and intensive occupational therapy improve upper limb motor function and cortical reorganization assessed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy in a subacute stroke patient. Case Rep Neurol. 10(2):223–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingerhoets G. 2014. Contribution of the posterior parietal cortex in reaching, grasping, and using objects and tools. Front Psychol. 5:151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Jia X, Zhang M, Cao Y, Zhao Z, Shan Y, Ma Q, Qian T, Wang J, Lu J, et al. 2018. Correlation of longitudinal gray matter volume changes and motor recovery in patients after pontine infarction. Front Neurol. 9(JUN):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wassermann EM. 1998. Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 108(1):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. 2001. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke. 32(7):1635–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, Rose DK, Winstein CJ, Taub E, Giuliani C, Pearson SL. 2005. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the wolf motor function test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 19(3):194–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Zhou YM, Liao CX, Tang YZ, Li YX, Qiu LH, Qin W, Zeng F, Liang FR. 2018. Structural changes induced by acupuncture in the recovering brain after ischemic stroke. Evid Based Compl Altern Med. 2018:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada N, Kakuda W, Senoo A, Kondo T, Mitani S, Shimizu M, Abo M. 2013. Functional cortical reorganization after low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation plus intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis: Evaluation by functional magnetic resonance imaging in poststroke patients. Int J Stroke. 8(6):422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada N, Ueda R, Kakuda W, Momosaki R, Kondo T, Hara T, Senoo A, Abo M. 2017. Diffusion tensor imaging evaluation of neural network development in patients undergoing therapeutic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation following stroke. Brain Stimul. 2018:3901016.
   Google Scholar
• Yu X, Yang L, Song R, Jiaerken Y, Yang J, Lou M, Jiang Q, Zhang M. 2017. Changes in structure and perfusion of grey matter tissues during recovery from Ischaemic subcortical stroke: a longitudinal MRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 46(7):2308–2314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatorre RJ, Fields RD, Johansen-Berg H. 2012. Plasticity in Gray and white: neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nat Neurosci. 15(4):528–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar