The effects of physical training versus combined action observation and motor imagery in conjunction with physical training on upper-extremity performance

References

• Adhikari SP, Tretriluxana J, Chaiyawat P, Jalayondeja C. 2018. Enhanced upper extremity functions with a single session of action-observation-execution and accelerated skill acquisition program in subacute stroke. Stroke Res Treat. 2018:1490692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alamer A, Melese H, Adugna B. 2020. Effectiveness of action observation training on upper limb motor function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 11:335–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badets A, Blandin Y, Shea CH. 2006. Intention in motor learning through observation. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 59(2):377–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay RE, Stevenson TJ, Poluha W, Semenko B, Schubert J. 2020. Mental practice for treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 5:CD005950.
   Google Scholar
• Bek J, Gowen E, Vogt S, Crawford TJ, Poliakoff E. 2019. Combined action observation and motor imagery influences hand movement amplitude in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 61:126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges LR, Fernandes AB, Melo LP, Guerra RO, Campos TF. 2018. Action observation for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 10:CD011887.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breslin G, Hodges NJ, Williams AM, Curran W, Kremer J. 2005. Modelling relative motion to facilitate intra-limb coordination. Hum Mov Sci. 24(3):446–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino G. 2014. Action observation treatment: a novel tool in neurorehabilitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 369(1644):20130185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligiore D, Mustile M, Spalletta G, Baldassarre G. 2017. Action observation and motor imagery for rehabilitation in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and an integrative hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 72:210–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Decety J. 1996. The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res. 77(1-2):45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decety J, Jeannerod M. 1995. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts’s law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res. 72(1–2):127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaves DL, Riach M, Holmes PS, Wright DJ. 2016. Motor imagery during action observation: a brief review of evidence, theory and future research opportunities. Front Neurosci. 10:514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewan LM, Smith NC, Holmes PS. 2010. Disruption to aspects of imagery vividness following stroke. J Ment Imagery. 34:3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Foerster RM, Carbone E, Koesling H, Schneider WX. 2011. Saccadic eye movements in a high-speed bimanual stacking task: changes of attentional control during learning and automatization. J Vis. 11(7):9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Carrasco D, Aboitiz Cantalapiedra J. 2016. Effectiveness of motor imagery or mental practice in functional recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurologia. 31(1):43–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L. 2010. The mirror neuron system: a neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 24(5):404–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanakawa T, Immisch I, Toma K, Dimyan MA, Van Gelderen P, Hallett M. 2003. Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. J Neurophysiol. 89(2):989–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes PS, Collins DJ. 2001. The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: a functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. J Appl Sport Psych. 13(1):60–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn RR, Williams AM, Scott MA, Hodges NJ. 2005. Visual search and coordination changes in response to video and point-light demonstrations without KR. J Mot Behav. 37(4):265–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izumi S, Findley TW, Ikai T, Andrews J, Daum M, Chino N. 1995. Facilitatory effect of thinking about movement on motor-evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 74(3):207–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai T, Kawai S, Kawanishi M, Yahagi S. 1997. Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery. Brain Res. 744(1):147–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawasaki T, Aramaki H, Tozawa R. 2015. An effective model for observational learning to improve novel motor performance. J Phys Ther Sci. 27(12):3829–3832.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. 2009. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 8(8):741–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malouin F, Jackson PL, Richards CL. 2013. Towards the integration of mental practice in rehabilitation programs. A critical review. Front Hum Neurosci. 7:576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall B, Wright DJ, Holmes PS, Williams J, Wood G. 2020. Combined action observation and motor imagery facilitates visuomotor adaptation in children with developmental coordination disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 98:103570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattar AA, Gribble PL. 2005. Motor learning by observing. Neuron. 46(1):153–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedelko V, Hassa T, Hamzei F, Schoenfeld MA, Dettmers C. 2012. Action imagery combined with action observation activates more corticomotor regions than action observation alone. J Neurol Phys Ther. 36(4):182–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson V, Watts N, Chani Y, Keogh JW. 2019. Motor imagery training improves balance and mobility outcomes in older adults: a systematic review. J Physiother. 65(4):200–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen DM, Gillen G, Gordon AM. 2010. Use of mental practice to improve upper-limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Am J Occup Ther. 64(5):695–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossmy O, Mukamel R. 2018. Perception as a route for motor skill learning: perspectives from neuroscience. Neuroscience. 382:144–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pixa NH, Steinberg F, Doppelmayr M. 2017. Effects of high-definition anodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied simultaneously to both primary motor cortices on bimanual sensorimotor performance. Front Behav Neurosci. 11:130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 27:169–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano SS, Wood G, Wright DJ, Wakefield CJ. 2018. Simultaneous and alternate action observation and motor imagery combinations improve aiming performance. Psychol Sport Exerc. 38:100–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto M, Muraoka T, Mizuguchi N, Kanosue K. 2009. Combining observation and imagery of an action enhances human corticospinal excitability. Neurosci Res. 65(1):23–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott M, Taylor S, Chesterton P, Vogt S, Eaves DL. 2018. Motor imagery during action observation increases eccentric hamstring force: an acute non-physical intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 40(12):1443–1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott MW, Emerson JR, Dixon J, Tayler MA, Eaves DL. 2020. Motor imagery during action observation enhances imitation of everyday rhythmical actions in children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Hum Mov Sci. 71:102620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott MW, Wood G, Holmes PS, Williams J, Marshall B, Wright DJ. 2021. Combined action observation and motor imagery: an intervention to combat the neural and behavioural deficits associated with developmental coordination disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 127:638–646.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott SH. 2016. A functional taxonomy of bottom-up sensory feedback processing for motor actions. Trends Neurosci. 39(8):512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer JP. 1995. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol. 46(1):561–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea CH, Wright DL, Wulf G, Whitacre C. 2000. Physical and observational practice afford unique learning opportunities. J Mot Behav. 32(1):27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solodkin A, Hlustik P, Chen EE, Small SL. 2004. Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cereb Cortex. 14(11):1246–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoykov ME, Madhavan S. 2015. Motor priming in neurorehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 39(1):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Wei W, Luo Z, Gan H, Hu X. 2016. Improving motor imagery practice with synchronous action observation in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil. 23(4):245–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taube W, Lorch M, Zeiter S, Keller M. 2014. Non-physical practice improves task performance in an unstable, perturbed environment: motor imagery and observational balance training. Front Hum Neurosci. 8:972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taube W, Mouthon M, Leukel C, Hoogewoud HM, Annoni JM, Keller M. 2015. Brain activity during observation and motor imagery of different balance tasks: an fMRI study. Cortex. 64:102–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper SP. 2010. From observation to action simulation: the role of attention, eye-gaze, emotion, and body state. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 63(11):2081–2105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretriluxana J, Taptong J, Chaiyawat P. 2015. Dyad training protocol on learning of bimanual cup stacking in individuals with stroke: effects of observation duration. J Med Assoc Thai. 98 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S106–S112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogt S, Di Rienzo F, Collet C, Collins A, Guillot A. 2013. Multiple roles of motor imagery during action observation. Front Hum Neurosci. 7:807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J, Flanagan JR. 2011. Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 12(12):739–751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar